Cargando…

How Accurate Are Transition States from Simulations of Enzymatic Reactions?

[Image: see text] The rate expression of traditional transition state theory (TST) assumes no recrossing of the transition state (TS) and thermal quasi-equilibrium between the ground state and the TS. Currently, it is not well understood to what extent these assumptions influence the nature of the a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doron, Dvir, Kohen, Amnon, Nam, Kwangho, Major, Dan Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2014
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4025581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24860275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct5000742
_version_ 1782316788765163520
author Doron, Dvir
Kohen, Amnon
Nam, Kwangho
Major, Dan Thomas
author_facet Doron, Dvir
Kohen, Amnon
Nam, Kwangho
Major, Dan Thomas
author_sort Doron, Dvir
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The rate expression of traditional transition state theory (TST) assumes no recrossing of the transition state (TS) and thermal quasi-equilibrium between the ground state and the TS. Currently, it is not well understood to what extent these assumptions influence the nature of the activated complex obtained in traditional TST-based simulations of processes in the condensed phase in general and in enzymes in particular. Here we scrutinize these assumptions by characterizing the TSs for hydride transfer catalyzed by the enzyme Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase obtained using various simulation approaches. Specifically, we compare the TSs obtained with common TST-based methods and a dynamics-based method. Using a recently developed accurate hybrid quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics potential, we find that the TST-based and dynamics-based methods give considerably different TS ensembles. This discrepancy, which could be due equilibrium solvation effects and the nature of the reaction coordinate employed and its motion, raises major questions about how to interpret the TSs determined by common simulation methods. We conclude that further investigation is needed to characterize the impact of various TST assumptions on the TS phase-space ensemble and on the reaction kinetics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4025581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40255812015-04-23 How Accurate Are Transition States from Simulations of Enzymatic Reactions? Doron, Dvir Kohen, Amnon Nam, Kwangho Major, Dan Thomas J Chem Theory Comput [Image: see text] The rate expression of traditional transition state theory (TST) assumes no recrossing of the transition state (TS) and thermal quasi-equilibrium between the ground state and the TS. Currently, it is not well understood to what extent these assumptions influence the nature of the activated complex obtained in traditional TST-based simulations of processes in the condensed phase in general and in enzymes in particular. Here we scrutinize these assumptions by characterizing the TSs for hydride transfer catalyzed by the enzyme Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase obtained using various simulation approaches. Specifically, we compare the TSs obtained with common TST-based methods and a dynamics-based method. Using a recently developed accurate hybrid quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics potential, we find that the TST-based and dynamics-based methods give considerably different TS ensembles. This discrepancy, which could be due equilibrium solvation effects and the nature of the reaction coordinate employed and its motion, raises major questions about how to interpret the TSs determined by common simulation methods. We conclude that further investigation is needed to characterize the impact of various TST assumptions on the TS phase-space ensemble and on the reaction kinetics. American Chemical Society 2014-04-23 2014-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4025581/ /pubmed/24860275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct5000742 Text en Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society
spellingShingle Doron, Dvir
Kohen, Amnon
Nam, Kwangho
Major, Dan Thomas
How Accurate Are Transition States from Simulations of Enzymatic Reactions?
title How Accurate Are Transition States from Simulations of Enzymatic Reactions?
title_full How Accurate Are Transition States from Simulations of Enzymatic Reactions?
title_fullStr How Accurate Are Transition States from Simulations of Enzymatic Reactions?
title_full_unstemmed How Accurate Are Transition States from Simulations of Enzymatic Reactions?
title_short How Accurate Are Transition States from Simulations of Enzymatic Reactions?
title_sort how accurate are transition states from simulations of enzymatic reactions?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4025581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24860275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct5000742
work_keys_str_mv AT dorondvir howaccuratearetransitionstatesfromsimulationsofenzymaticreactions
AT kohenamnon howaccuratearetransitionstatesfromsimulationsofenzymaticreactions
AT namkwangho howaccuratearetransitionstatesfromsimulationsofenzymaticreactions
AT majordanthomas howaccuratearetransitionstatesfromsimulationsofenzymaticreactions