Cargando…
How Accurate Are Transition States from Simulations of Enzymatic Reactions?
[Image: see text] The rate expression of traditional transition state theory (TST) assumes no recrossing of the transition state (TS) and thermal quasi-equilibrium between the ground state and the TS. Currently, it is not well understood to what extent these assumptions influence the nature of the a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American
Chemical Society
2014
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4025581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24860275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct5000742 |
_version_ | 1782316788765163520 |
---|---|
author | Doron, Dvir Kohen, Amnon Nam, Kwangho Major, Dan Thomas |
author_facet | Doron, Dvir Kohen, Amnon Nam, Kwangho Major, Dan Thomas |
author_sort | Doron, Dvir |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] The rate expression of traditional transition state theory (TST) assumes no recrossing of the transition state (TS) and thermal quasi-equilibrium between the ground state and the TS. Currently, it is not well understood to what extent these assumptions influence the nature of the activated complex obtained in traditional TST-based simulations of processes in the condensed phase in general and in enzymes in particular. Here we scrutinize these assumptions by characterizing the TSs for hydride transfer catalyzed by the enzyme Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase obtained using various simulation approaches. Specifically, we compare the TSs obtained with common TST-based methods and a dynamics-based method. Using a recently developed accurate hybrid quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics potential, we find that the TST-based and dynamics-based methods give considerably different TS ensembles. This discrepancy, which could be due equilibrium solvation effects and the nature of the reaction coordinate employed and its motion, raises major questions about how to interpret the TSs determined by common simulation methods. We conclude that further investigation is needed to characterize the impact of various TST assumptions on the TS phase-space ensemble and on the reaction kinetics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4025581 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | American
Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40255812015-04-23 How Accurate Are Transition States from Simulations of Enzymatic Reactions? Doron, Dvir Kohen, Amnon Nam, Kwangho Major, Dan Thomas J Chem Theory Comput [Image: see text] The rate expression of traditional transition state theory (TST) assumes no recrossing of the transition state (TS) and thermal quasi-equilibrium between the ground state and the TS. Currently, it is not well understood to what extent these assumptions influence the nature of the activated complex obtained in traditional TST-based simulations of processes in the condensed phase in general and in enzymes in particular. Here we scrutinize these assumptions by characterizing the TSs for hydride transfer catalyzed by the enzyme Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase obtained using various simulation approaches. Specifically, we compare the TSs obtained with common TST-based methods and a dynamics-based method. Using a recently developed accurate hybrid quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics potential, we find that the TST-based and dynamics-based methods give considerably different TS ensembles. This discrepancy, which could be due equilibrium solvation effects and the nature of the reaction coordinate employed and its motion, raises major questions about how to interpret the TSs determined by common simulation methods. We conclude that further investigation is needed to characterize the impact of various TST assumptions on the TS phase-space ensemble and on the reaction kinetics. American Chemical Society 2014-04-23 2014-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4025581/ /pubmed/24860275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct5000742 Text en Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society |
spellingShingle | Doron, Dvir Kohen, Amnon Nam, Kwangho Major, Dan Thomas How Accurate Are Transition States from Simulations of Enzymatic Reactions? |
title | How Accurate
Are Transition States from
Simulations of Enzymatic Reactions? |
title_full | How Accurate
Are Transition States from
Simulations of Enzymatic Reactions? |
title_fullStr | How Accurate
Are Transition States from
Simulations of Enzymatic Reactions? |
title_full_unstemmed | How Accurate
Are Transition States from
Simulations of Enzymatic Reactions? |
title_short | How Accurate
Are Transition States from
Simulations of Enzymatic Reactions? |
title_sort | how accurate
are transition states from
simulations of enzymatic reactions? |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4025581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24860275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct5000742 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dorondvir howaccuratearetransitionstatesfromsimulationsofenzymaticreactions AT kohenamnon howaccuratearetransitionstatesfromsimulationsofenzymaticreactions AT namkwangho howaccuratearetransitionstatesfromsimulationsofenzymaticreactions AT majordanthomas howaccuratearetransitionstatesfromsimulationsofenzymaticreactions |