Cargando…

Role of season, temperature and humidity on the incidence of epistaxis in Alberta, Canada

BACKGROUND: Classical dogma holds that epistaxis is more common in winter months but there is significant variability reported in the literature. No study has yet examined the effect of season, humidity and temperature on epistaxis in a location with as severe weather extremes as seen in Alberta, Ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sowerby, Leigh J, DeSerres, Joshua J, Rudmik, Luke, Wright, Erin D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4026858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24755112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1916-0216-43-10
_version_ 1782316912313630720
author Sowerby, Leigh J
DeSerres, Joshua J
Rudmik, Luke
Wright, Erin D
author_facet Sowerby, Leigh J
DeSerres, Joshua J
Rudmik, Luke
Wright, Erin D
author_sort Sowerby, Leigh J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Classical dogma holds that epistaxis is more common in winter months but there is significant variability reported in the literature. No study has yet examined the effect of season, humidity and temperature on epistaxis in a location with as severe weather extremes as seen in Alberta, Canada. The objective of the study is to evaluate for an effect of these meteorological factors on the incidence of epistaxis in Alberta. METHOD: A retrospective review of consecutive adult patients presenting to the Emergency room (ER) in Edmonton and Calgary, Alberta over a three-year period was performed. Daily temperature and humidity data was recorded from the respective airports. Statistical analysis with Pearson’s correlation coefficient was performed. RESULTS: 4315 patients presented during the study period. Mean daily temperatures ranged from a low of -40°C to a high of +23°C. A significant negative correlation was found for mean monthly temperature with epistaxis (Pearson’s r = -0.835, p = 0.001). A significant correlation was also present for daily temperature and epistaxis presentation (Pearson’s r = -0.55, p = 0.018, range 1.8 to 2.2 events/day). No correlation was identified with humidity and no significant seasonal variation was present. CONCLUSIONS: A negative correlation was found to exist for both daily and mean monthly temperature with rates of epistaxis. A seasonal variation was seen in Edmonton but not in Calgary. No correlation was found for humidity when compared to both presentation rates and admissions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4026858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40268582014-05-21 Role of season, temperature and humidity on the incidence of epistaxis in Alberta, Canada Sowerby, Leigh J DeSerres, Joshua J Rudmik, Luke Wright, Erin D J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Classical dogma holds that epistaxis is more common in winter months but there is significant variability reported in the literature. No study has yet examined the effect of season, humidity and temperature on epistaxis in a location with as severe weather extremes as seen in Alberta, Canada. The objective of the study is to evaluate for an effect of these meteorological factors on the incidence of epistaxis in Alberta. METHOD: A retrospective review of consecutive adult patients presenting to the Emergency room (ER) in Edmonton and Calgary, Alberta over a three-year period was performed. Daily temperature and humidity data was recorded from the respective airports. Statistical analysis with Pearson’s correlation coefficient was performed. RESULTS: 4315 patients presented during the study period. Mean daily temperatures ranged from a low of -40°C to a high of +23°C. A significant negative correlation was found for mean monthly temperature with epistaxis (Pearson’s r = -0.835, p = 0.001). A significant correlation was also present for daily temperature and epistaxis presentation (Pearson’s r = -0.55, p = 0.018, range 1.8 to 2.2 events/day). No correlation was identified with humidity and no significant seasonal variation was present. CONCLUSIONS: A negative correlation was found to exist for both daily and mean monthly temperature with rates of epistaxis. A seasonal variation was seen in Edmonton but not in Calgary. No correlation was found for humidity when compared to both presentation rates and admissions. BioMed Central 2014-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4026858/ /pubmed/24755112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1916-0216-43-10 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sowerby et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Sowerby, Leigh J
DeSerres, Joshua J
Rudmik, Luke
Wright, Erin D
Role of season, temperature and humidity on the incidence of epistaxis in Alberta, Canada
title Role of season, temperature and humidity on the incidence of epistaxis in Alberta, Canada
title_full Role of season, temperature and humidity on the incidence of epistaxis in Alberta, Canada
title_fullStr Role of season, temperature and humidity on the incidence of epistaxis in Alberta, Canada
title_full_unstemmed Role of season, temperature and humidity on the incidence of epistaxis in Alberta, Canada
title_short Role of season, temperature and humidity on the incidence of epistaxis in Alberta, Canada
title_sort role of season, temperature and humidity on the incidence of epistaxis in alberta, canada
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4026858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24755112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1916-0216-43-10
work_keys_str_mv AT sowerbyleighj roleofseasontemperatureandhumidityontheincidenceofepistaxisinalbertacanada
AT deserresjoshuaj roleofseasontemperatureandhumidityontheincidenceofepistaxisinalbertacanada
AT rudmikluke roleofseasontemperatureandhumidityontheincidenceofepistaxisinalbertacanada
AT wrighterind roleofseasontemperatureandhumidityontheincidenceofepistaxisinalbertacanada