Cargando…
Partner smoking and maternal cotinine during pregnancy: Implications for negative control methods()
BACKGROUND: Comparison of the associations of maternal and mother's partner smoking with offspring outcomes is, in theory, a useful method for assessing whether there may be an intrauterine effect of tobacco exposure on these outcomes. However, this approach assumes that the effects of passive...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4026952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24726428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.03.012 |
_version_ | 1782316922693484544 |
---|---|
author | Taylor, Amy E. Davey Smith, George Bares, Cristina B. Edwards, Alexis C. Munafò, Marcus R. |
author_facet | Taylor, Amy E. Davey Smith, George Bares, Cristina B. Edwards, Alexis C. Munafò, Marcus R. |
author_sort | Taylor, Amy E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Comparison of the associations of maternal and mother's partner smoking with offspring outcomes is, in theory, a useful method for assessing whether there may be an intrauterine effect of tobacco exposure on these outcomes. However, this approach assumes that the effects of passive smoking from exposure to partner smoking during pregnancy are minimal. We evaluated this assumption using a biochemical measure of tobacco exposure in pregnant women. METHODS: Cotinine levels taken during the first trimester of pregnancy were measured in a sample of 3928 women from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Median cotinine values were compared across categories of smoking heaviness (cigarettes per day) of the women during the first trimester and in non-smoking women by the smoking heaviness of their partner. RESULTS: Cotinine levels were substantially higher in women who smoked compared to non-smokers (range of medians across smoking heaviness categories: 900–5362 ng/ml versus 20 ng/ml, interquartile range (IQR) (0–63) for non-smokers). In contrast, cotinine levels in non-smoking women were only very weakly related to partner smoking status (range of medians in women with smoking partners: 34–69 ng/ml versus 12 ng/ml, IQR (0–48) in women with non-smoking partners). CONCLUSIONS: Levels of tobacco exposure from partner smoking, as assessed by cotinine, were low in non-smoking pregnant women. This suggests that using mother's partner's smoking as a negative control for investigating intrauterine effects is valid. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4026952 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40269522014-06-01 Partner smoking and maternal cotinine during pregnancy: Implications for negative control methods() Taylor, Amy E. Davey Smith, George Bares, Cristina B. Edwards, Alexis C. Munafò, Marcus R. Drug Alcohol Depend Short Communication BACKGROUND: Comparison of the associations of maternal and mother's partner smoking with offspring outcomes is, in theory, a useful method for assessing whether there may be an intrauterine effect of tobacco exposure on these outcomes. However, this approach assumes that the effects of passive smoking from exposure to partner smoking during pregnancy are minimal. We evaluated this assumption using a biochemical measure of tobacco exposure in pregnant women. METHODS: Cotinine levels taken during the first trimester of pregnancy were measured in a sample of 3928 women from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Median cotinine values were compared across categories of smoking heaviness (cigarettes per day) of the women during the first trimester and in non-smoking women by the smoking heaviness of their partner. RESULTS: Cotinine levels were substantially higher in women who smoked compared to non-smokers (range of medians across smoking heaviness categories: 900–5362 ng/ml versus 20 ng/ml, interquartile range (IQR) (0–63) for non-smokers). In contrast, cotinine levels in non-smoking women were only very weakly related to partner smoking status (range of medians in women with smoking partners: 34–69 ng/ml versus 12 ng/ml, IQR (0–48) in women with non-smoking partners). CONCLUSIONS: Levels of tobacco exposure from partner smoking, as assessed by cotinine, were low in non-smoking pregnant women. This suggests that using mother's partner's smoking as a negative control for investigating intrauterine effects is valid. Elsevier 2014-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4026952/ /pubmed/24726428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.03.012 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Taylor, Amy E. Davey Smith, George Bares, Cristina B. Edwards, Alexis C. Munafò, Marcus R. Partner smoking and maternal cotinine during pregnancy: Implications for negative control methods() |
title | Partner smoking and maternal cotinine during pregnancy: Implications for negative control methods() |
title_full | Partner smoking and maternal cotinine during pregnancy: Implications for negative control methods() |
title_fullStr | Partner smoking and maternal cotinine during pregnancy: Implications for negative control methods() |
title_full_unstemmed | Partner smoking and maternal cotinine during pregnancy: Implications for negative control methods() |
title_short | Partner smoking and maternal cotinine during pregnancy: Implications for negative control methods() |
title_sort | partner smoking and maternal cotinine during pregnancy: implications for negative control methods() |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4026952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24726428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.03.012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tayloramye partnersmokingandmaternalcotinineduringpregnancyimplicationsfornegativecontrolmethods AT daveysmithgeorge partnersmokingandmaternalcotinineduringpregnancyimplicationsfornegativecontrolmethods AT barescristinab partnersmokingandmaternalcotinineduringpregnancyimplicationsfornegativecontrolmethods AT edwardsalexisc partnersmokingandmaternalcotinineduringpregnancyimplicationsfornegativecontrolmethods AT munafomarcusr partnersmokingandmaternalcotinineduringpregnancyimplicationsfornegativecontrolmethods |