Cargando…

Treatment Patterns in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma: A Retrospective Analysis

Objective. To describe treatment patterns and factors influencing treatment in a real-world setting of US patients with metastatic melanoma (MM). Methods. This was a retrospective claims-based study among patients with MM diagnosed between 2005 and 2010 identified from MarketScan databases. Results....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Zhongyun, Wang, Song, Barber, Beth L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4026983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24883209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/371326
_version_ 1782316929608843264
author Zhao, Zhongyun
Wang, Song
Barber, Beth L.
author_facet Zhao, Zhongyun
Wang, Song
Barber, Beth L.
author_sort Zhao, Zhongyun
collection PubMed
description Objective. To describe treatment patterns and factors influencing treatment in a real-world setting of US patients with metastatic melanoma (MM). Methods. This was a retrospective claims-based study among patients with MM diagnosed between 2005 and 2010 identified from MarketScan databases. Results. Of 2546 MM patients, 66.8% received surgery, 44.7% received radiation, 38.7% received systemic therapies, and 17.7% received all modalities. Patients with lung, brain, liver, or bone metastases were less likely to undergo surgery (all P < 0.0001); patients with lung (P = 0.04), brain (P < 0.001), or liver metastases (P = 0.03) were more likely to receive systemic therapies; patients with brain (P < 0.0001) or bone metastases (P < 0.0001) were more likely to receive radiation therapy. Oncologists were more likely to recommend systemic therapy (P < 0.0001) or radiation (P < 0.0001), while dermatologists were more likely to recommend surgery (P = 0.002). Monotherapy was the dominant systemic therapy (82.4% patients as first-line). Conclusions. Only 39% of MM patients received systemic therapies, perhaps reflecting efficacy and safety limitations of conventional systemic therapies for MM. Among those receiving systemic therapy, monotherapy was the most common approach. Sites of metastases and physician speciality influenced treatment patterns. This study serves as a baseline against which future treatment pattern studies, following approval of new agents, can be compared.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4026983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40269832014-06-01 Treatment Patterns in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma: A Retrospective Analysis Zhao, Zhongyun Wang, Song Barber, Beth L. J Skin Cancer Clinical Study Objective. To describe treatment patterns and factors influencing treatment in a real-world setting of US patients with metastatic melanoma (MM). Methods. This was a retrospective claims-based study among patients with MM diagnosed between 2005 and 2010 identified from MarketScan databases. Results. Of 2546 MM patients, 66.8% received surgery, 44.7% received radiation, 38.7% received systemic therapies, and 17.7% received all modalities. Patients with lung, brain, liver, or bone metastases were less likely to undergo surgery (all P < 0.0001); patients with lung (P = 0.04), brain (P < 0.001), or liver metastases (P = 0.03) were more likely to receive systemic therapies; patients with brain (P < 0.0001) or bone metastases (P < 0.0001) were more likely to receive radiation therapy. Oncologists were more likely to recommend systemic therapy (P < 0.0001) or radiation (P < 0.0001), while dermatologists were more likely to recommend surgery (P = 0.002). Monotherapy was the dominant systemic therapy (82.4% patients as first-line). Conclusions. Only 39% of MM patients received systemic therapies, perhaps reflecting efficacy and safety limitations of conventional systemic therapies for MM. Among those receiving systemic therapy, monotherapy was the most common approach. Sites of metastases and physician speciality influenced treatment patterns. This study serves as a baseline against which future treatment pattern studies, following approval of new agents, can be compared. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4026983/ /pubmed/24883209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/371326 Text en Copyright © 2014 Zhongyun Zhao et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Zhao, Zhongyun
Wang, Song
Barber, Beth L.
Treatment Patterns in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma: A Retrospective Analysis
title Treatment Patterns in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma: A Retrospective Analysis
title_full Treatment Patterns in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma: A Retrospective Analysis
title_fullStr Treatment Patterns in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma: A Retrospective Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Treatment Patterns in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma: A Retrospective Analysis
title_short Treatment Patterns in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma: A Retrospective Analysis
title_sort treatment patterns in patients with metastatic melanoma: a retrospective analysis
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4026983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24883209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/371326
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaozhongyun treatmentpatternsinpatientswithmetastaticmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT wangsong treatmentpatternsinpatientswithmetastaticmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT barberbethl treatmentpatternsinpatientswithmetastaticmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis