Cargando…
The use of surveillance and preventative measures for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections in surgical patients
The Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality (AHRQ) found that Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is associated with up to 375,000 infections and 23,000 deaths in the United States. It is a major cause of surgical site infections, with a higher mortality and longer duration of ca...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4028005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24847437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-3-18 |
_version_ | 1782317025856585728 |
---|---|
author | Kavanagh, Kevin T Calderon, Lindsay E Saman, Daniel M Abusalem, Said K |
author_facet | Kavanagh, Kevin T Calderon, Lindsay E Saman, Daniel M Abusalem, Said K |
author_sort | Kavanagh, Kevin T |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality (AHRQ) found that Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is associated with up to 375,000 infections and 23,000 deaths in the United States. It is a major cause of surgical site infections, with a higher mortality and longer duration of care than Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. A multifactorial bundled approach is needed to control this epidemic, with single interventions unlikely to have a significant impact on attenuating MRSA infection rates. Active surveillance has been studied in a wide range of surgical patients, including surgical intensive care and non-intensive care units; cardiac, vascular, orthopedic, obstetric, head and neck cancer and gastrostomy patients. There is sufficient evidence demonstrating a beneficial effect of surveillance and eradication prior to surgery to recommend its use on an expanded basis. Studies on MRSA surveillance in surgical patients that were published over the last 10 years were reviewed. In at least five of these studies, the MRSA colonization status of patients was reported to be a factor in preoperative antibiotic selection, with the modification of treatment regiments including the switching to vancomycin or teicoplanin in MRSA positive preoperative patients. Several authors also used decolonization protocols on all preoperative patients but used surveillance to determine the duration of the decolonization. Universal decolonization of all patients, regardless of MRSA status has been advocated as an alternative prevention protocol in which surveillance is not utilized. Concern exists regarding antimicrobial stewardship. The daily and universal use of intranasal antibiotics and/or antiseptic washes may encourage the promotion of bacterial resistance and provide a competitive advantage to other more lethal organisms. Decolonization protocols which indiscriminately neutralize all bacteria may not be the best approach. If a patient's microbiome is markedly challenged with antimicrobials, rebuilding it with replacement commensal bacteria may become a future therapy. Preoperative MRSA surveillance allows the selection of appropriate prophylactic antibiotics, the use of extended decolonization protocols in positive patients, and provides needed data for epidemiological studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4028005 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40280052014-05-21 The use of surveillance and preventative measures for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections in surgical patients Kavanagh, Kevin T Calderon, Lindsay E Saman, Daniel M Abusalem, Said K Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Review The Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality (AHRQ) found that Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is associated with up to 375,000 infections and 23,000 deaths in the United States. It is a major cause of surgical site infections, with a higher mortality and longer duration of care than Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. A multifactorial bundled approach is needed to control this epidemic, with single interventions unlikely to have a significant impact on attenuating MRSA infection rates. Active surveillance has been studied in a wide range of surgical patients, including surgical intensive care and non-intensive care units; cardiac, vascular, orthopedic, obstetric, head and neck cancer and gastrostomy patients. There is sufficient evidence demonstrating a beneficial effect of surveillance and eradication prior to surgery to recommend its use on an expanded basis. Studies on MRSA surveillance in surgical patients that were published over the last 10 years were reviewed. In at least five of these studies, the MRSA colonization status of patients was reported to be a factor in preoperative antibiotic selection, with the modification of treatment regiments including the switching to vancomycin or teicoplanin in MRSA positive preoperative patients. Several authors also used decolonization protocols on all preoperative patients but used surveillance to determine the duration of the decolonization. Universal decolonization of all patients, regardless of MRSA status has been advocated as an alternative prevention protocol in which surveillance is not utilized. Concern exists regarding antimicrobial stewardship. The daily and universal use of intranasal antibiotics and/or antiseptic washes may encourage the promotion of bacterial resistance and provide a competitive advantage to other more lethal organisms. Decolonization protocols which indiscriminately neutralize all bacteria may not be the best approach. If a patient's microbiome is markedly challenged with antimicrobials, rebuilding it with replacement commensal bacteria may become a future therapy. Preoperative MRSA surveillance allows the selection of appropriate prophylactic antibiotics, the use of extended decolonization protocols in positive patients, and provides needed data for epidemiological studies. BioMed Central 2014-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4028005/ /pubmed/24847437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-3-18 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kavanagh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Kavanagh, Kevin T Calderon, Lindsay E Saman, Daniel M Abusalem, Said K The use of surveillance and preventative measures for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections in surgical patients |
title | The use of surveillance and preventative measures for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections in surgical patients |
title_full | The use of surveillance and preventative measures for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections in surgical patients |
title_fullStr | The use of surveillance and preventative measures for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections in surgical patients |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of surveillance and preventative measures for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections in surgical patients |
title_short | The use of surveillance and preventative measures for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections in surgical patients |
title_sort | use of surveillance and preventative measures for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections in surgical patients |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4028005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24847437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-3-18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kavanaghkevint theuseofsurveillanceandpreventativemeasuresformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinfectionsinsurgicalpatients AT calderonlindsaye theuseofsurveillanceandpreventativemeasuresformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinfectionsinsurgicalpatients AT samandanielm theuseofsurveillanceandpreventativemeasuresformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinfectionsinsurgicalpatients AT abusalemsaidk theuseofsurveillanceandpreventativemeasuresformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinfectionsinsurgicalpatients AT kavanaghkevint useofsurveillanceandpreventativemeasuresformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinfectionsinsurgicalpatients AT calderonlindsaye useofsurveillanceandpreventativemeasuresformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinfectionsinsurgicalpatients AT samandanielm useofsurveillanceandpreventativemeasuresformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinfectionsinsurgicalpatients AT abusalemsaidk useofsurveillanceandpreventativemeasuresformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinfectionsinsurgicalpatients |