Cargando…

Efficacy of a modern neuroscience approach versus usual care evidence-based physiotherapy on pain, disability and brain characteristics in chronic spinal pain patients: protocol of a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Among the multiple conservative modalities, physiotherapy is a commonly utilized treatment modality in managing chronic non-specific spinal pain. Despite the scientific progresses with regard to pain and motor control neuroscience, treatment of chronic spinal pain (CSP) often tends to st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dolphens, Mieke, Nijs, Jo, Cagnie, Barbara, Meeus, Mira, Roussel, Nathalie, Kregel, Jeroen, Malfliet, Anneleen, Vanderstraeten, Guy, Danneels, Lieven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4028010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-149
_version_ 1782317027038330880
author Dolphens, Mieke
Nijs, Jo
Cagnie, Barbara
Meeus, Mira
Roussel, Nathalie
Kregel, Jeroen
Malfliet, Anneleen
Vanderstraeten, Guy
Danneels, Lieven
author_facet Dolphens, Mieke
Nijs, Jo
Cagnie, Barbara
Meeus, Mira
Roussel, Nathalie
Kregel, Jeroen
Malfliet, Anneleen
Vanderstraeten, Guy
Danneels, Lieven
author_sort Dolphens, Mieke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Among the multiple conservative modalities, physiotherapy is a commonly utilized treatment modality in managing chronic non-specific spinal pain. Despite the scientific progresses with regard to pain and motor control neuroscience, treatment of chronic spinal pain (CSP) often tends to stick to a peripheral biomechanical model, without targeting brain mechanisms. With a view to enhance clinical efficacy of existing physiotherapeutic treatments for CSP, the development of clinical strategies targeted at ‘training the brain’ is to be pursued. Promising proof-of-principle results have been reported for the effectiveness of a modern neuroscience approach to CSP when compared to usual care, but confirmation is required in a larger, multi-center trial with appropriate evidence-based control intervention and long-term follow-up. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a modern neuroscience approach, compared to usual care evidence-based physiotherapy, for reducing pain and improving functioning in patients with CSP. A secondary objective entails examining the effectiveness of the modern neuroscience approach versus usual care physiotherapy for normalizing brain gray matter in patients with CSP. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is a multi-center, triple-blind, two-arm (1:1) randomized clinical trial with 1-year follow-up. 120 CSP patients will be randomly allocated to either the experimental (receiving pain neuroscience education followed by cognition-targeted motor control training) or the control group (receiving usual care physiotherapy), each comprising of 3 months treatment. The main outcome measures are pain (including symptoms and indices of central sensitization) and self-reported disability. Secondary outcome measures include brain gray matter structure, motor control, muscle properties, and psychosocial correlates. Clinical assessment and brain imaging will be performed at baseline, post-treatment and at 1-year follow-up. Web-based questionnaires will be completed at baseline, after the first 3 treatment sessions, post-treatment, and at 6 and 12-months follow-up. DISCUSSION: Findings may provide empirical evidence on: (1) the effectiveness of a modern neuroscience approach to CSP for reducing pain and improving functioning, (2) the effectiveness of a modern neuroscience approach for normalizing brain gray matter in CSP patients, and (3) factors associated with therapy success. Hence, this trial might contribute towards refining guidelines for good clinical practice and might be used as a basis for health authorities’ recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02098005.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4028010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40280102014-05-21 Efficacy of a modern neuroscience approach versus usual care evidence-based physiotherapy on pain, disability and brain characteristics in chronic spinal pain patients: protocol of a randomized clinical trial Dolphens, Mieke Nijs, Jo Cagnie, Barbara Meeus, Mira Roussel, Nathalie Kregel, Jeroen Malfliet, Anneleen Vanderstraeten, Guy Danneels, Lieven BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Among the multiple conservative modalities, physiotherapy is a commonly utilized treatment modality in managing chronic non-specific spinal pain. Despite the scientific progresses with regard to pain and motor control neuroscience, treatment of chronic spinal pain (CSP) often tends to stick to a peripheral biomechanical model, without targeting brain mechanisms. With a view to enhance clinical efficacy of existing physiotherapeutic treatments for CSP, the development of clinical strategies targeted at ‘training the brain’ is to be pursued. Promising proof-of-principle results have been reported for the effectiveness of a modern neuroscience approach to CSP when compared to usual care, but confirmation is required in a larger, multi-center trial with appropriate evidence-based control intervention and long-term follow-up. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a modern neuroscience approach, compared to usual care evidence-based physiotherapy, for reducing pain and improving functioning in patients with CSP. A secondary objective entails examining the effectiveness of the modern neuroscience approach versus usual care physiotherapy for normalizing brain gray matter in patients with CSP. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is a multi-center, triple-blind, two-arm (1:1) randomized clinical trial with 1-year follow-up. 120 CSP patients will be randomly allocated to either the experimental (receiving pain neuroscience education followed by cognition-targeted motor control training) or the control group (receiving usual care physiotherapy), each comprising of 3 months treatment. The main outcome measures are pain (including symptoms and indices of central sensitization) and self-reported disability. Secondary outcome measures include brain gray matter structure, motor control, muscle properties, and psychosocial correlates. Clinical assessment and brain imaging will be performed at baseline, post-treatment and at 1-year follow-up. Web-based questionnaires will be completed at baseline, after the first 3 treatment sessions, post-treatment, and at 6 and 12-months follow-up. DISCUSSION: Findings may provide empirical evidence on: (1) the effectiveness of a modern neuroscience approach to CSP for reducing pain and improving functioning, (2) the effectiveness of a modern neuroscience approach for normalizing brain gray matter in CSP patients, and (3) factors associated with therapy success. Hence, this trial might contribute towards refining guidelines for good clinical practice and might be used as a basis for health authorities’ recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02098005. BioMed Central 2014-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4028010/ /pubmed/24885889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-149 Text en Copyright © 2014 Dolphens et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Dolphens, Mieke
Nijs, Jo
Cagnie, Barbara
Meeus, Mira
Roussel, Nathalie
Kregel, Jeroen
Malfliet, Anneleen
Vanderstraeten, Guy
Danneels, Lieven
Efficacy of a modern neuroscience approach versus usual care evidence-based physiotherapy on pain, disability and brain characteristics in chronic spinal pain patients: protocol of a randomized clinical trial
title Efficacy of a modern neuroscience approach versus usual care evidence-based physiotherapy on pain, disability and brain characteristics in chronic spinal pain patients: protocol of a randomized clinical trial
title_full Efficacy of a modern neuroscience approach versus usual care evidence-based physiotherapy on pain, disability and brain characteristics in chronic spinal pain patients: protocol of a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of a modern neuroscience approach versus usual care evidence-based physiotherapy on pain, disability and brain characteristics in chronic spinal pain patients: protocol of a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of a modern neuroscience approach versus usual care evidence-based physiotherapy on pain, disability and brain characteristics in chronic spinal pain patients: protocol of a randomized clinical trial
title_short Efficacy of a modern neuroscience approach versus usual care evidence-based physiotherapy on pain, disability and brain characteristics in chronic spinal pain patients: protocol of a randomized clinical trial
title_sort efficacy of a modern neuroscience approach versus usual care evidence-based physiotherapy on pain, disability and brain characteristics in chronic spinal pain patients: protocol of a randomized clinical trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4028010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-149
work_keys_str_mv AT dolphensmieke efficacyofamodernneuroscienceapproachversususualcareevidencebasedphysiotherapyonpaindisabilityandbraincharacteristicsinchronicspinalpainpatientsprotocolofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT nijsjo efficacyofamodernneuroscienceapproachversususualcareevidencebasedphysiotherapyonpaindisabilityandbraincharacteristicsinchronicspinalpainpatientsprotocolofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT cagniebarbara efficacyofamodernneuroscienceapproachversususualcareevidencebasedphysiotherapyonpaindisabilityandbraincharacteristicsinchronicspinalpainpatientsprotocolofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT meeusmira efficacyofamodernneuroscienceapproachversususualcareevidencebasedphysiotherapyonpaindisabilityandbraincharacteristicsinchronicspinalpainpatientsprotocolofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT rousselnathalie efficacyofamodernneuroscienceapproachversususualcareevidencebasedphysiotherapyonpaindisabilityandbraincharacteristicsinchronicspinalpainpatientsprotocolofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kregeljeroen efficacyofamodernneuroscienceapproachversususualcareevidencebasedphysiotherapyonpaindisabilityandbraincharacteristicsinchronicspinalpainpatientsprotocolofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT malflietanneleen efficacyofamodernneuroscienceapproachversususualcareevidencebasedphysiotherapyonpaindisabilityandbraincharacteristicsinchronicspinalpainpatientsprotocolofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT vanderstraetenguy efficacyofamodernneuroscienceapproachversususualcareevidencebasedphysiotherapyonpaindisabilityandbraincharacteristicsinchronicspinalpainpatientsprotocolofarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT danneelslieven efficacyofamodernneuroscienceapproachversususualcareevidencebasedphysiotherapyonpaindisabilityandbraincharacteristicsinchronicspinalpainpatientsprotocolofarandomizedclinicaltrial