Cargando…
Spatiotemporal dynamics of DNA repair proteins following laser microbeam induced DNA damage – When is a DSB not a DSB?()
The formation of DNA lesions poses a constant threat to cellular stability. Repair of endogenously and exogenously produced lesions has therefore been extensively studied, although the spatiotemporal dynamics of the repair processes has yet to be fully understood. One of the most recent advances to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4028083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23688615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.05.006 |
_version_ | 1782317032212004864 |
---|---|
author | Reynolds, Pamela Botchway, Stanley W. Parker, Anthony W. O’Neill, Peter |
author_facet | Reynolds, Pamela Botchway, Stanley W. Parker, Anthony W. O’Neill, Peter |
author_sort | Reynolds, Pamela |
collection | PubMed |
description | The formation of DNA lesions poses a constant threat to cellular stability. Repair of endogenously and exogenously produced lesions has therefore been extensively studied, although the spatiotemporal dynamics of the repair processes has yet to be fully understood. One of the most recent advances to study the kinetics of DNA repair has been the development of laser microbeams to induce and visualize recruitment and loss of repair proteins to base damage in live mammalian cells. However, a number of studies have produced contradictory results that are likely caused by the different laser systems used reflecting in part the wavelength dependence of the damage induced. Additionally, the repair kinetics of laser microbeam induced DNA lesions have generally lacked consideration of the structural and chemical complexity of the DNA damage sites, which are known to greatly influence their reparability. In this review, we highlight the key considerations when embarking on laser microbeam experiments and interpreting the real time data from laser microbeam irradiations. We compare the repair kinetics from live cell imaging with biochemical and direct quantitative cellular measurements for DNA repair. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4028083 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40280832014-05-28 Spatiotemporal dynamics of DNA repair proteins following laser microbeam induced DNA damage – When is a DSB not a DSB?() Reynolds, Pamela Botchway, Stanley W. Parker, Anthony W. O’Neill, Peter Mutat Res Article The formation of DNA lesions poses a constant threat to cellular stability. Repair of endogenously and exogenously produced lesions has therefore been extensively studied, although the spatiotemporal dynamics of the repair processes has yet to be fully understood. One of the most recent advances to study the kinetics of DNA repair has been the development of laser microbeams to induce and visualize recruitment and loss of repair proteins to base damage in live mammalian cells. However, a number of studies have produced contradictory results that are likely caused by the different laser systems used reflecting in part the wavelength dependence of the damage induced. Additionally, the repair kinetics of laser microbeam induced DNA lesions have generally lacked consideration of the structural and chemical complexity of the DNA damage sites, which are known to greatly influence their reparability. In this review, we highlight the key considerations when embarking on laser microbeam experiments and interpreting the real time data from laser microbeam irradiations. We compare the repair kinetics from live cell imaging with biochemical and direct quantitative cellular measurements for DNA repair. Elsevier 2013-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4028083/ /pubmed/23688615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.05.006 Text en © 2013 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license |
spellingShingle | Article Reynolds, Pamela Botchway, Stanley W. Parker, Anthony W. O’Neill, Peter Spatiotemporal dynamics of DNA repair proteins following laser microbeam induced DNA damage – When is a DSB not a DSB?() |
title | Spatiotemporal dynamics of DNA repair proteins following laser microbeam induced DNA damage – When is a DSB not a DSB?() |
title_full | Spatiotemporal dynamics of DNA repair proteins following laser microbeam induced DNA damage – When is a DSB not a DSB?() |
title_fullStr | Spatiotemporal dynamics of DNA repair proteins following laser microbeam induced DNA damage – When is a DSB not a DSB?() |
title_full_unstemmed | Spatiotemporal dynamics of DNA repair proteins following laser microbeam induced DNA damage – When is a DSB not a DSB?() |
title_short | Spatiotemporal dynamics of DNA repair proteins following laser microbeam induced DNA damage – When is a DSB not a DSB?() |
title_sort | spatiotemporal dynamics of dna repair proteins following laser microbeam induced dna damage – when is a dsb not a dsb?() |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4028083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23688615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.05.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reynoldspamela spatiotemporaldynamicsofdnarepairproteinsfollowinglasermicrobeaminduceddnadamagewhenisadsbnotadsb AT botchwaystanleyw spatiotemporaldynamicsofdnarepairproteinsfollowinglasermicrobeaminduceddnadamagewhenisadsbnotadsb AT parkeranthonyw spatiotemporaldynamicsofdnarepairproteinsfollowinglasermicrobeaminduceddnadamagewhenisadsbnotadsb AT oneillpeter spatiotemporaldynamicsofdnarepairproteinsfollowinglasermicrobeaminduceddnadamagewhenisadsbnotadsb |