Cargando…

Distinguishing West Nile virus infection using a recombinant envelope protein with mutations in the conserved fusion-loop

BACKGROUND: West Nile Virus (WNV) is an emerging mosquito-transmitted flavivirus that continues to spread and cause disease throughout several parts of the world, including Europe and the Americas. Specific diagnosis of WNV infections using current serological testing is complicated by the high degr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chabierski, Stefan, Barzon, Luisa, Papa, Anna, Niedrig, Matthias, Bramson, Jonathan L, Richner, Justin M, Palù, Giorgio, Diamond, Michael S, Ulbert, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4028281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-246
_version_ 1782317059580887040
author Chabierski, Stefan
Barzon, Luisa
Papa, Anna
Niedrig, Matthias
Bramson, Jonathan L
Richner, Justin M
Palù, Giorgio
Diamond, Michael S
Ulbert, Sebastian
author_facet Chabierski, Stefan
Barzon, Luisa
Papa, Anna
Niedrig, Matthias
Bramson, Jonathan L
Richner, Justin M
Palù, Giorgio
Diamond, Michael S
Ulbert, Sebastian
author_sort Chabierski, Stefan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: West Nile Virus (WNV) is an emerging mosquito-transmitted flavivirus that continues to spread and cause disease throughout several parts of the world, including Europe and the Americas. Specific diagnosis of WNV infections using current serological testing is complicated by the high degree of cross-reactivity between antibodies against other clinically relevant flaviviruses, including dengue, tick-borne encephalitis (TBEV), Japanese encephalitis (JEV), and yellow fever (YFV) viruses. Cross-reactivity is particularly problematic in areas where different flaviviruses co-circulate or in populations that have been immunized with vaccines against TBEV, JEV, or YFV. The majority of cross-reactive antibodies against the immunodominant flavivirus envelope (E) protein target a conserved epitope in the fusion loop at the distal end of domain II. METHODS: We tested a loss-of-function bacterially expressed recombinant WNV E protein containing mutations in the fusion loop and an adjacent loop domain as a possible diagnostic reagent. By comparing the binding of sera from humans infected with WNV or other flaviviruses to the wild type and the mutant E proteins, we analyzed the potential of this technology to specifically detect WNV antibodies. RESULTS: Using this system, we could reliably determine WNV infections. Antibodies from WNV-infected individuals bound equally well to the wild type and the mutant protein. In contrast, sera from persons infected with other flaviviruses showed significantly decreased binding to the mutant protein. By calculating the mean differences between antibody signals detected using the wild type and the mutant proteins, a value could be assigned for each of the flaviviruses, which distinguished their pattern of reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: Recombinant mutant E proteins can be used to discriminate infections with WNV from those with other flaviviruses. The data have important implications for the development of improved, specific serological assays for the detection of WNV antibodies in regions where other flaviviruses co-circulate or in populations that are immunized with other flavivirus vaccines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4028281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40282812014-05-21 Distinguishing West Nile virus infection using a recombinant envelope protein with mutations in the conserved fusion-loop Chabierski, Stefan Barzon, Luisa Papa, Anna Niedrig, Matthias Bramson, Jonathan L Richner, Justin M Palù, Giorgio Diamond, Michael S Ulbert, Sebastian BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: West Nile Virus (WNV) is an emerging mosquito-transmitted flavivirus that continues to spread and cause disease throughout several parts of the world, including Europe and the Americas. Specific diagnosis of WNV infections using current serological testing is complicated by the high degree of cross-reactivity between antibodies against other clinically relevant flaviviruses, including dengue, tick-borne encephalitis (TBEV), Japanese encephalitis (JEV), and yellow fever (YFV) viruses. Cross-reactivity is particularly problematic in areas where different flaviviruses co-circulate or in populations that have been immunized with vaccines against TBEV, JEV, or YFV. The majority of cross-reactive antibodies against the immunodominant flavivirus envelope (E) protein target a conserved epitope in the fusion loop at the distal end of domain II. METHODS: We tested a loss-of-function bacterially expressed recombinant WNV E protein containing mutations in the fusion loop and an adjacent loop domain as a possible diagnostic reagent. By comparing the binding of sera from humans infected with WNV or other flaviviruses to the wild type and the mutant E proteins, we analyzed the potential of this technology to specifically detect WNV antibodies. RESULTS: Using this system, we could reliably determine WNV infections. Antibodies from WNV-infected individuals bound equally well to the wild type and the mutant protein. In contrast, sera from persons infected with other flaviviruses showed significantly decreased binding to the mutant protein. By calculating the mean differences between antibody signals detected using the wild type and the mutant proteins, a value could be assigned for each of the flaviviruses, which distinguished their pattern of reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: Recombinant mutant E proteins can be used to discriminate infections with WNV from those with other flaviviruses. The data have important implications for the development of improved, specific serological assays for the detection of WNV antibodies in regions where other flaviviruses co-circulate or in populations that are immunized with other flavivirus vaccines. BioMed Central 2014-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4028281/ /pubmed/24884467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-246 Text en Copyright © 2014 Chabierski et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chabierski, Stefan
Barzon, Luisa
Papa, Anna
Niedrig, Matthias
Bramson, Jonathan L
Richner, Justin M
Palù, Giorgio
Diamond, Michael S
Ulbert, Sebastian
Distinguishing West Nile virus infection using a recombinant envelope protein with mutations in the conserved fusion-loop
title Distinguishing West Nile virus infection using a recombinant envelope protein with mutations in the conserved fusion-loop
title_full Distinguishing West Nile virus infection using a recombinant envelope protein with mutations in the conserved fusion-loop
title_fullStr Distinguishing West Nile virus infection using a recombinant envelope protein with mutations in the conserved fusion-loop
title_full_unstemmed Distinguishing West Nile virus infection using a recombinant envelope protein with mutations in the conserved fusion-loop
title_short Distinguishing West Nile virus infection using a recombinant envelope protein with mutations in the conserved fusion-loop
title_sort distinguishing west nile virus infection using a recombinant envelope protein with mutations in the conserved fusion-loop
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4028281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-246
work_keys_str_mv AT chabierskistefan distinguishingwestnilevirusinfectionusingarecombinantenvelopeproteinwithmutationsintheconservedfusionloop
AT barzonluisa distinguishingwestnilevirusinfectionusingarecombinantenvelopeproteinwithmutationsintheconservedfusionloop
AT papaanna distinguishingwestnilevirusinfectionusingarecombinantenvelopeproteinwithmutationsintheconservedfusionloop
AT niedrigmatthias distinguishingwestnilevirusinfectionusingarecombinantenvelopeproteinwithmutationsintheconservedfusionloop
AT bramsonjonathanl distinguishingwestnilevirusinfectionusingarecombinantenvelopeproteinwithmutationsintheconservedfusionloop
AT richnerjustinm distinguishingwestnilevirusinfectionusingarecombinantenvelopeproteinwithmutationsintheconservedfusionloop
AT palugiorgio distinguishingwestnilevirusinfectionusingarecombinantenvelopeproteinwithmutationsintheconservedfusionloop
AT diamondmichaels distinguishingwestnilevirusinfectionusingarecombinantenvelopeproteinwithmutationsintheconservedfusionloop
AT ulbertsebastian distinguishingwestnilevirusinfectionusingarecombinantenvelopeproteinwithmutationsintheconservedfusionloop