Cargando…

‘Safety by DEFAULT’: introduction and impact of a paediatric ward round checklist

INTRODUCTION: Poor communication is a source of risk. This can be particularly significant in areas of high clinical acuity such as intensive care. Ward rounds are points where large amounts of information must be communicated in a time-limited environment with many competing interests. This has the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Sanjiv, Peters, Mark J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4028750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24479381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13055
_version_ 1782317096642805760
author Sharma, Sanjiv
Peters, Mark J
author_facet Sharma, Sanjiv
Peters, Mark J
author_sort Sharma, Sanjiv
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Poor communication is a source of risk. This can be particularly significant in areas of high clinical acuity such as intensive care. Ward rounds are points where large amounts of information must be communicated in a time-limited environment with many competing interests. This has the potential to reduce effective communication and risk patient safety. Checklists have been used in many industries to improve communication and mitigate risk. We describe the introduction of a ward round safety checklist ‘DEFAULT’ on a paediatric intensive care unit. METHODS: A non-blinded, pre- and post-intervention observational study was undertaken in a 12-bedded Level 3 tertiary PICU between July 2009 and December 2011. RESULTS: Ward round stakeholders subjectively liked the checklist and felt it improved communication. Introduction of the ward round checklist was associated with an increase in median days between accidental extubations from 14 (range 2 to 86) to 150 (56 to 365) (Mann–Whitney P <0.0001). The ward round checklist was also associated with an increase in the proportion of invasively ventilated patients with target tidal volumes of <8 ml/kg, which increased from 35 of 71 patients at 08.00 representing a proportion of 0.49 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.60) to 23 of 38 (0.61, 0.45 to 0.74). This represented a trend towards an increased proportion of cases in the target range (z = 1.68, P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a ward round safety checklist was associated with improved communication and patient safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4028750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40287502014-05-22 ‘Safety by DEFAULT’: introduction and impact of a paediatric ward round checklist Sharma, Sanjiv Peters, Mark J Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Poor communication is a source of risk. This can be particularly significant in areas of high clinical acuity such as intensive care. Ward rounds are points where large amounts of information must be communicated in a time-limited environment with many competing interests. This has the potential to reduce effective communication and risk patient safety. Checklists have been used in many industries to improve communication and mitigate risk. We describe the introduction of a ward round safety checklist ‘DEFAULT’ on a paediatric intensive care unit. METHODS: A non-blinded, pre- and post-intervention observational study was undertaken in a 12-bedded Level 3 tertiary PICU between July 2009 and December 2011. RESULTS: Ward round stakeholders subjectively liked the checklist and felt it improved communication. Introduction of the ward round checklist was associated with an increase in median days between accidental extubations from 14 (range 2 to 86) to 150 (56 to 365) (Mann–Whitney P <0.0001). The ward round checklist was also associated with an increase in the proportion of invasively ventilated patients with target tidal volumes of <8 ml/kg, which increased from 35 of 71 patients at 08.00 representing a proportion of 0.49 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.60) to 23 of 38 (0.61, 0.45 to 0.74). This represented a trend towards an increased proportion of cases in the target range (z = 1.68, P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a ward round safety checklist was associated with improved communication and patient safety. BioMed Central 2013 2013-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4028750/ /pubmed/24479381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13055 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sharma et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Sharma, Sanjiv
Peters, Mark J
‘Safety by DEFAULT’: introduction and impact of a paediatric ward round checklist
title ‘Safety by DEFAULT’: introduction and impact of a paediatric ward round checklist
title_full ‘Safety by DEFAULT’: introduction and impact of a paediatric ward round checklist
title_fullStr ‘Safety by DEFAULT’: introduction and impact of a paediatric ward round checklist
title_full_unstemmed ‘Safety by DEFAULT’: introduction and impact of a paediatric ward round checklist
title_short ‘Safety by DEFAULT’: introduction and impact of a paediatric ward round checklist
title_sort ‘safety by default’: introduction and impact of a paediatric ward round checklist
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4028750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24479381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc13055
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmasanjiv safetybydefaultintroductionandimpactofapaediatricwardroundchecklist
AT petersmarkj safetybydefaultintroductionandimpactofapaediatricwardroundchecklist