Cargando…

Trends of risk classification and primary therapy for Japanese patients with prostate cancer in Nara Uro-Oncological Research Group (NUORG)–a comparison between 2004-2006 and 2007-2009

BACKGROUND: To assess the trends of risk classification and primary therapy in Japanese patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2004-2006 and 2007-2009. METHODS: A total of 4752 patients who were newly diagnosed with prostate cancer at Nara Medical University and its 23 affiliated h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanaka, Nobumichi, Hirayama, Akihide, Yoneda, Tatsuo, Yoshida, Katsunori, Shimada, Keiji, Konishi, Noboru, Fujimoto, Kiyohide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4028809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24325407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-588
_version_ 1782317109929312256
author Tanaka, Nobumichi
Hirayama, Akihide
Yoneda, Tatsuo
Yoshida, Katsunori
Shimada, Keiji
Konishi, Noboru
Fujimoto, Kiyohide
author_facet Tanaka, Nobumichi
Hirayama, Akihide
Yoneda, Tatsuo
Yoshida, Katsunori
Shimada, Keiji
Konishi, Noboru
Fujimoto, Kiyohide
author_sort Tanaka, Nobumichi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the trends of risk classification and primary therapy in Japanese patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2004-2006 and 2007-2009. METHODS: A total of 4752 patients who were newly diagnosed with prostate cancer at Nara Medical University and its 23 affiliated hospitals between 2004 and 2009 were enrolled. The differences in risk classification and primary therapy were compared in patients who were newly diagnosed between 2004-2006 (prior period) and 2007-2009 (latter period). RESULTS: The proportion of patients with a high or greater risk significantly decreased in the latter period compared to the prior period (p < 0.001). The proportion of primary androgen deprivation therapy (PADT) was 50% in the prior period, and 40% in the latter period. On the other hand, the proportion of radiation therapy was 14% in the prior period, but 24% in the latter period. The proportion of radical prostatectomy was the same in the two periods (30%). The primary therapy was significantly different between the two periods (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher risk patients significantly decreased in the latter period compared to the prior period. The use of PADT also significantly decreased in the latter period. However, there were still higher risk patients in Japan, and the use of PADT was still common in patients with localized prostate cancer or locally advanced prostate cancer in Japan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4028809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40288092014-05-22 Trends of risk classification and primary therapy for Japanese patients with prostate cancer in Nara Uro-Oncological Research Group (NUORG)–a comparison between 2004-2006 and 2007-2009 Tanaka, Nobumichi Hirayama, Akihide Yoneda, Tatsuo Yoshida, Katsunori Shimada, Keiji Konishi, Noboru Fujimoto, Kiyohide BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: To assess the trends of risk classification and primary therapy in Japanese patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2004-2006 and 2007-2009. METHODS: A total of 4752 patients who were newly diagnosed with prostate cancer at Nara Medical University and its 23 affiliated hospitals between 2004 and 2009 were enrolled. The differences in risk classification and primary therapy were compared in patients who were newly diagnosed between 2004-2006 (prior period) and 2007-2009 (latter period). RESULTS: The proportion of patients with a high or greater risk significantly decreased in the latter period compared to the prior period (p < 0.001). The proportion of primary androgen deprivation therapy (PADT) was 50% in the prior period, and 40% in the latter period. On the other hand, the proportion of radiation therapy was 14% in the prior period, but 24% in the latter period. The proportion of radical prostatectomy was the same in the two periods (30%). The primary therapy was significantly different between the two periods (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher risk patients significantly decreased in the latter period compared to the prior period. The use of PADT also significantly decreased in the latter period. However, there were still higher risk patients in Japan, and the use of PADT was still common in patients with localized prostate cancer or locally advanced prostate cancer in Japan. BioMed Central 2013-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4028809/ /pubmed/24325407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-588 Text en Copyright © 2013 Tanaka et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tanaka, Nobumichi
Hirayama, Akihide
Yoneda, Tatsuo
Yoshida, Katsunori
Shimada, Keiji
Konishi, Noboru
Fujimoto, Kiyohide
Trends of risk classification and primary therapy for Japanese patients with prostate cancer in Nara Uro-Oncological Research Group (NUORG)–a comparison between 2004-2006 and 2007-2009
title Trends of risk classification and primary therapy for Japanese patients with prostate cancer in Nara Uro-Oncological Research Group (NUORG)–a comparison between 2004-2006 and 2007-2009
title_full Trends of risk classification and primary therapy for Japanese patients with prostate cancer in Nara Uro-Oncological Research Group (NUORG)–a comparison between 2004-2006 and 2007-2009
title_fullStr Trends of risk classification and primary therapy for Japanese patients with prostate cancer in Nara Uro-Oncological Research Group (NUORG)–a comparison between 2004-2006 and 2007-2009
title_full_unstemmed Trends of risk classification and primary therapy for Japanese patients with prostate cancer in Nara Uro-Oncological Research Group (NUORG)–a comparison between 2004-2006 and 2007-2009
title_short Trends of risk classification and primary therapy for Japanese patients with prostate cancer in Nara Uro-Oncological Research Group (NUORG)–a comparison between 2004-2006 and 2007-2009
title_sort trends of risk classification and primary therapy for japanese patients with prostate cancer in nara uro-oncological research group (nuorg)–a comparison between 2004-2006 and 2007-2009
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4028809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24325407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-588
work_keys_str_mv AT tanakanobumichi trendsofriskclassificationandprimarytherapyforjapanesepatientswithprostatecancerinnaraurooncologicalresearchgroupnuorgacomparisonbetween20042006and20072009
AT hirayamaakihide trendsofriskclassificationandprimarytherapyforjapanesepatientswithprostatecancerinnaraurooncologicalresearchgroupnuorgacomparisonbetween20042006and20072009
AT yonedatatsuo trendsofriskclassificationandprimarytherapyforjapanesepatientswithprostatecancerinnaraurooncologicalresearchgroupnuorgacomparisonbetween20042006and20072009
AT yoshidakatsunori trendsofriskclassificationandprimarytherapyforjapanesepatientswithprostatecancerinnaraurooncologicalresearchgroupnuorgacomparisonbetween20042006and20072009
AT shimadakeiji trendsofriskclassificationandprimarytherapyforjapanesepatientswithprostatecancerinnaraurooncologicalresearchgroupnuorgacomparisonbetween20042006and20072009
AT konishinoboru trendsofriskclassificationandprimarytherapyforjapanesepatientswithprostatecancerinnaraurooncologicalresearchgroupnuorgacomparisonbetween20042006and20072009
AT fujimotokiyohide trendsofriskclassificationandprimarytherapyforjapanesepatientswithprostatecancerinnaraurooncologicalresearchgroupnuorgacomparisonbetween20042006and20072009