Cargando…

Lexical-perceptual integration influences sensorimotor adaptation in speech

A combination of lexical bias and altered auditory feedback was used to investigate the influence of higher-order linguistic knowledge on the perceptual aspects of speech motor control. Subjects produced monosyllabic real words or pseudo-words containing the vowel [ε] (as in “head”) under conditions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bourguignon, Nicolas J., Baum, Shari R., Shiller, Douglas M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24860460
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00208
_version_ 1782317145291489280
author Bourguignon, Nicolas J.
Baum, Shari R.
Shiller, Douglas M.
author_facet Bourguignon, Nicolas J.
Baum, Shari R.
Shiller, Douglas M.
author_sort Bourguignon, Nicolas J.
collection PubMed
description A combination of lexical bias and altered auditory feedback was used to investigate the influence of higher-order linguistic knowledge on the perceptual aspects of speech motor control. Subjects produced monosyllabic real words or pseudo-words containing the vowel [ε] (as in “head”) under conditions of altered auditory feedback involving a decrease in vowel first formant (F1) frequency. This manipulation had the effect of making the vowel sound more similar to [I] (as in “hid”), affecting the lexical status of produced words in two Lexical-Change (LC) groups (either changing them from real words to pseudo-words: e.g., less—liss, or pseudo-words to real words: e.g., kess—kiss). Two Non-Lexical-Change (NLC) control groups underwent the same auditory feedback manipulation during the production of [ε] real- or pseudo-words, only without any resulting change in lexical status (real words to real words: e.g., mess—miss, or pseudo-words to pseudo-words: e.g., ness—niss). The results from the LC groups indicate that auditory-feedback-based speech motor learning is sensitive to the lexical status of the stimuli being produced, in that speakers tend to keep their acoustic speech outcomes within the auditory-perceptual space corresponding to the task-related side of the word/non-word boundary (real words or pseudo-words). For the NLC groups, however, no such effect of lexical status is observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4029003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40290032014-05-23 Lexical-perceptual integration influences sensorimotor adaptation in speech Bourguignon, Nicolas J. Baum, Shari R. Shiller, Douglas M. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience A combination of lexical bias and altered auditory feedback was used to investigate the influence of higher-order linguistic knowledge on the perceptual aspects of speech motor control. Subjects produced monosyllabic real words or pseudo-words containing the vowel [ε] (as in “head”) under conditions of altered auditory feedback involving a decrease in vowel first formant (F1) frequency. This manipulation had the effect of making the vowel sound more similar to [I] (as in “hid”), affecting the lexical status of produced words in two Lexical-Change (LC) groups (either changing them from real words to pseudo-words: e.g., less—liss, or pseudo-words to real words: e.g., kess—kiss). Two Non-Lexical-Change (NLC) control groups underwent the same auditory feedback manipulation during the production of [ε] real- or pseudo-words, only without any resulting change in lexical status (real words to real words: e.g., mess—miss, or pseudo-words to pseudo-words: e.g., ness—niss). The results from the LC groups indicate that auditory-feedback-based speech motor learning is sensitive to the lexical status of the stimuli being produced, in that speakers tend to keep their acoustic speech outcomes within the auditory-perceptual space corresponding to the task-related side of the word/non-word boundary (real words or pseudo-words). For the NLC groups, however, no such effect of lexical status is observed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4029003/ /pubmed/24860460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00208 Text en Copyright © 2014 Bourguignon, Baum and Shiller. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Bourguignon, Nicolas J.
Baum, Shari R.
Shiller, Douglas M.
Lexical-perceptual integration influences sensorimotor adaptation in speech
title Lexical-perceptual integration influences sensorimotor adaptation in speech
title_full Lexical-perceptual integration influences sensorimotor adaptation in speech
title_fullStr Lexical-perceptual integration influences sensorimotor adaptation in speech
title_full_unstemmed Lexical-perceptual integration influences sensorimotor adaptation in speech
title_short Lexical-perceptual integration influences sensorimotor adaptation in speech
title_sort lexical-perceptual integration influences sensorimotor adaptation in speech
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24860460
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00208
work_keys_str_mv AT bourguignonnicolasj lexicalperceptualintegrationinfluencessensorimotoradaptationinspeech
AT baumsharir lexicalperceptualintegrationinfluencessensorimotoradaptationinspeech
AT shillerdouglasm lexicalperceptualintegrationinfluencessensorimotoradaptationinspeech