Cargando…

A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI)

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether deferred stenting might reduce no-reflow and salvage myocardium in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: No-reflow is associated with adverse outcomes in STEMI. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carrick, David, Oldroyd, Keith G., McEntegart, Margaret, Haig, Caroline, Petrie, Mark C., Eteiba, Hany, Hood, Stuart, Owens, Colum, Watkins, Stuart, Layland, Jamie, Lindsay, Mitchell, Peat, Eileen, Rae, Alan, Behan, Miles, Sood, Arvind, Hillis, W. Stewart, Mordi, Ify, Mahrous, Ahmed, Ahmed, Nadeem, Wilson, Rebekah, Lasalle, Laura, Généreux, Philippe, Ford, Ian, Berry, Colin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Biomedical 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24583294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.530
_version_ 1782317154525249536
author Carrick, David
Oldroyd, Keith G.
McEntegart, Margaret
Haig, Caroline
Petrie, Mark C.
Eteiba, Hany
Hood, Stuart
Owens, Colum
Watkins, Stuart
Layland, Jamie
Lindsay, Mitchell
Peat, Eileen
Rae, Alan
Behan, Miles
Sood, Arvind
Hillis, W. Stewart
Mordi, Ify
Mahrous, Ahmed
Ahmed, Nadeem
Wilson, Rebekah
Lasalle, Laura
Généreux, Philippe
Ford, Ian
Berry, Colin
author_facet Carrick, David
Oldroyd, Keith G.
McEntegart, Margaret
Haig, Caroline
Petrie, Mark C.
Eteiba, Hany
Hood, Stuart
Owens, Colum
Watkins, Stuart
Layland, Jamie
Lindsay, Mitchell
Peat, Eileen
Rae, Alan
Behan, Miles
Sood, Arvind
Hillis, W. Stewart
Mordi, Ify
Mahrous, Ahmed
Ahmed, Nadeem
Wilson, Rebekah
Lasalle, Laura
Généreux, Philippe
Ford, Ian
Berry, Colin
author_sort Carrick, David
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether deferred stenting might reduce no-reflow and salvage myocardium in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: No-reflow is associated with adverse outcomes in STEMI. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept trial in reperfused STEMI patients with ≥1 risk factors for no-reflow. Randomization was to deferred stenting with an intention-to-stent 4 to 16 h later or conventional treatment with immediate stenting. The primary outcome was the incidence of no-/slow-reflow (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction ≤2). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed 2 days and 6 months after myocardial infarction. Myocardial salvage was the final infarct size indexed to the initial area at risk. RESULTS: Of 411 STEMI patients (March 11, 2012 to November 21, 2012), 101 patients (mean age, 60 years; 69% male) were randomized (52 to the deferred stenting group, 49 to the immediate stenting). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to the second procedure in the deferred stenting group was 9 h (IQR: 6 to 12 h). Fewer patients in the deferred stenting group had no-/slow-reflow (14 [29%] vs. 3 [6%]; p = 0.006), no reflow (7 [14%] vs. 1 [2%]; p = 0.052) and intraprocedural thrombotic events (16 [33%] vs. 5 [10%]; p = 0.010). Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction coronary flow grades at the end of PCI were higher in the deferred stenting group (p = 0.018). Recurrent STEMI occurred in 2 patients in the deferred stenting group before the second procedure. Myocardial salvage index at 6 months was greater in the deferred stenting group (68 [IQR: 54% to 82%] vs. 56 [IQR: 31% to 72%]; p = 0.031]. CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk STEMI patients, deferred stenting in primary PCI reduced no-reflow and increased myocardial salvage. (Deferred Stent Trial in STEMI; NCT01717573)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4029071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier Biomedical
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40290712014-05-28 A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI) Carrick, David Oldroyd, Keith G. McEntegart, Margaret Haig, Caroline Petrie, Mark C. Eteiba, Hany Hood, Stuart Owens, Colum Watkins, Stuart Layland, Jamie Lindsay, Mitchell Peat, Eileen Rae, Alan Behan, Miles Sood, Arvind Hillis, W. Stewart Mordi, Ify Mahrous, Ahmed Ahmed, Nadeem Wilson, Rebekah Lasalle, Laura Généreux, Philippe Ford, Ian Berry, Colin J Am Coll Cardiol Clinical Research OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether deferred stenting might reduce no-reflow and salvage myocardium in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: No-reflow is associated with adverse outcomes in STEMI. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept trial in reperfused STEMI patients with ≥1 risk factors for no-reflow. Randomization was to deferred stenting with an intention-to-stent 4 to 16 h later or conventional treatment with immediate stenting. The primary outcome was the incidence of no-/slow-reflow (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction ≤2). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed 2 days and 6 months after myocardial infarction. Myocardial salvage was the final infarct size indexed to the initial area at risk. RESULTS: Of 411 STEMI patients (March 11, 2012 to November 21, 2012), 101 patients (mean age, 60 years; 69% male) were randomized (52 to the deferred stenting group, 49 to the immediate stenting). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to the second procedure in the deferred stenting group was 9 h (IQR: 6 to 12 h). Fewer patients in the deferred stenting group had no-/slow-reflow (14 [29%] vs. 3 [6%]; p = 0.006), no reflow (7 [14%] vs. 1 [2%]; p = 0.052) and intraprocedural thrombotic events (16 [33%] vs. 5 [10%]; p = 0.010). Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction coronary flow grades at the end of PCI were higher in the deferred stenting group (p = 0.018). Recurrent STEMI occurred in 2 patients in the deferred stenting group before the second procedure. Myocardial salvage index at 6 months was greater in the deferred stenting group (68 [IQR: 54% to 82%] vs. 56 [IQR: 31% to 72%]; p = 0.031]. CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk STEMI patients, deferred stenting in primary PCI reduced no-reflow and increased myocardial salvage. (Deferred Stent Trial in STEMI; NCT01717573) Elsevier Biomedical 2014-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4029071/ /pubmed/24583294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.530 Text en © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Carrick, David
Oldroyd, Keith G.
McEntegart, Margaret
Haig, Caroline
Petrie, Mark C.
Eteiba, Hany
Hood, Stuart
Owens, Colum
Watkins, Stuart
Layland, Jamie
Lindsay, Mitchell
Peat, Eileen
Rae, Alan
Behan, Miles
Sood, Arvind
Hillis, W. Stewart
Mordi, Ify
Mahrous, Ahmed
Ahmed, Nadeem
Wilson, Rebekah
Lasalle, Laura
Généreux, Philippe
Ford, Ian
Berry, Colin
A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI)
title A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI)
title_full A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI)
title_fullStr A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI)
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI)
title_short A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI)
title_sort randomized trial of deferred stenting versus immediate stenting to prevent no- or slow-reflow in acute st-segment elevation myocardial infarction (defer-stemi)
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24583294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.530
work_keys_str_mv AT carrickdavid arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT oldroydkeithg arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT mcentegartmargaret arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT haigcaroline arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT petriemarkc arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT eteibahany arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT hoodstuart arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT owenscolum arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT watkinsstuart arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT laylandjamie arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT lindsaymitchell arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT peateileen arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT raealan arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT behanmiles arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT soodarvind arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT hilliswstewart arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT mordiify arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT mahrousahmed arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT ahmednadeem arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT wilsonrebekah arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT lasallelaura arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT genereuxphilippe arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT fordian arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT berrycolin arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT carrickdavid randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT oldroydkeithg randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT mcentegartmargaret randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT haigcaroline randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT petriemarkc randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT eteibahany randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT hoodstuart randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT owenscolum randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT watkinsstuart randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT laylandjamie randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT lindsaymitchell randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT peateileen randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT raealan randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT behanmiles randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT soodarvind randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT hilliswstewart randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT mordiify randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT mahrousahmed randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT ahmednadeem randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT wilsonrebekah randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT lasallelaura randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT genereuxphilippe randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT fordian randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi
AT berrycolin randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi