Cargando…
A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI)
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether deferred stenting might reduce no-reflow and salvage myocardium in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: No-reflow is associated with adverse outcomes in STEMI. METH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Biomedical
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24583294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.530 |
_version_ | 1782317154525249536 |
---|---|
author | Carrick, David Oldroyd, Keith G. McEntegart, Margaret Haig, Caroline Petrie, Mark C. Eteiba, Hany Hood, Stuart Owens, Colum Watkins, Stuart Layland, Jamie Lindsay, Mitchell Peat, Eileen Rae, Alan Behan, Miles Sood, Arvind Hillis, W. Stewart Mordi, Ify Mahrous, Ahmed Ahmed, Nadeem Wilson, Rebekah Lasalle, Laura Généreux, Philippe Ford, Ian Berry, Colin |
author_facet | Carrick, David Oldroyd, Keith G. McEntegart, Margaret Haig, Caroline Petrie, Mark C. Eteiba, Hany Hood, Stuart Owens, Colum Watkins, Stuart Layland, Jamie Lindsay, Mitchell Peat, Eileen Rae, Alan Behan, Miles Sood, Arvind Hillis, W. Stewart Mordi, Ify Mahrous, Ahmed Ahmed, Nadeem Wilson, Rebekah Lasalle, Laura Généreux, Philippe Ford, Ian Berry, Colin |
author_sort | Carrick, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether deferred stenting might reduce no-reflow and salvage myocardium in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: No-reflow is associated with adverse outcomes in STEMI. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept trial in reperfused STEMI patients with ≥1 risk factors for no-reflow. Randomization was to deferred stenting with an intention-to-stent 4 to 16 h later or conventional treatment with immediate stenting. The primary outcome was the incidence of no-/slow-reflow (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction ≤2). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed 2 days and 6 months after myocardial infarction. Myocardial salvage was the final infarct size indexed to the initial area at risk. RESULTS: Of 411 STEMI patients (March 11, 2012 to November 21, 2012), 101 patients (mean age, 60 years; 69% male) were randomized (52 to the deferred stenting group, 49 to the immediate stenting). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to the second procedure in the deferred stenting group was 9 h (IQR: 6 to 12 h). Fewer patients in the deferred stenting group had no-/slow-reflow (14 [29%] vs. 3 [6%]; p = 0.006), no reflow (7 [14%] vs. 1 [2%]; p = 0.052) and intraprocedural thrombotic events (16 [33%] vs. 5 [10%]; p = 0.010). Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction coronary flow grades at the end of PCI were higher in the deferred stenting group (p = 0.018). Recurrent STEMI occurred in 2 patients in the deferred stenting group before the second procedure. Myocardial salvage index at 6 months was greater in the deferred stenting group (68 [IQR: 54% to 82%] vs. 56 [IQR: 31% to 72%]; p = 0.031]. CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk STEMI patients, deferred stenting in primary PCI reduced no-reflow and increased myocardial salvage. (Deferred Stent Trial in STEMI; NCT01717573) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4029071 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Elsevier Biomedical |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40290712014-05-28 A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI) Carrick, David Oldroyd, Keith G. McEntegart, Margaret Haig, Caroline Petrie, Mark C. Eteiba, Hany Hood, Stuart Owens, Colum Watkins, Stuart Layland, Jamie Lindsay, Mitchell Peat, Eileen Rae, Alan Behan, Miles Sood, Arvind Hillis, W. Stewart Mordi, Ify Mahrous, Ahmed Ahmed, Nadeem Wilson, Rebekah Lasalle, Laura Généreux, Philippe Ford, Ian Berry, Colin J Am Coll Cardiol Clinical Research OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess whether deferred stenting might reduce no-reflow and salvage myocardium in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: No-reflow is associated with adverse outcomes in STEMI. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept trial in reperfused STEMI patients with ≥1 risk factors for no-reflow. Randomization was to deferred stenting with an intention-to-stent 4 to 16 h later or conventional treatment with immediate stenting. The primary outcome was the incidence of no-/slow-reflow (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction ≤2). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed 2 days and 6 months after myocardial infarction. Myocardial salvage was the final infarct size indexed to the initial area at risk. RESULTS: Of 411 STEMI patients (March 11, 2012 to November 21, 2012), 101 patients (mean age, 60 years; 69% male) were randomized (52 to the deferred stenting group, 49 to the immediate stenting). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to the second procedure in the deferred stenting group was 9 h (IQR: 6 to 12 h). Fewer patients in the deferred stenting group had no-/slow-reflow (14 [29%] vs. 3 [6%]; p = 0.006), no reflow (7 [14%] vs. 1 [2%]; p = 0.052) and intraprocedural thrombotic events (16 [33%] vs. 5 [10%]; p = 0.010). Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction coronary flow grades at the end of PCI were higher in the deferred stenting group (p = 0.018). Recurrent STEMI occurred in 2 patients in the deferred stenting group before the second procedure. Myocardial salvage index at 6 months was greater in the deferred stenting group (68 [IQR: 54% to 82%] vs. 56 [IQR: 31% to 72%]; p = 0.031]. CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk STEMI patients, deferred stenting in primary PCI reduced no-reflow and increased myocardial salvage. (Deferred Stent Trial in STEMI; NCT01717573) Elsevier Biomedical 2014-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4029071/ /pubmed/24583294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.530 Text en © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Carrick, David Oldroyd, Keith G. McEntegart, Margaret Haig, Caroline Petrie, Mark C. Eteiba, Hany Hood, Stuart Owens, Colum Watkins, Stuart Layland, Jamie Lindsay, Mitchell Peat, Eileen Rae, Alan Behan, Miles Sood, Arvind Hillis, W. Stewart Mordi, Ify Mahrous, Ahmed Ahmed, Nadeem Wilson, Rebekah Lasalle, Laura Généreux, Philippe Ford, Ian Berry, Colin A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI) |
title | A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI) |
title_full | A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI) |
title_fullStr | A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI) |
title_full_unstemmed | A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI) |
title_short | A Randomized Trial of Deferred Stenting Versus Immediate Stenting to Prevent No- or Slow-Reflow in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (DEFER-STEMI) |
title_sort | randomized trial of deferred stenting versus immediate stenting to prevent no- or slow-reflow in acute st-segment elevation myocardial infarction (defer-stemi) |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24583294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.530 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carrickdavid arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT oldroydkeithg arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT mcentegartmargaret arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT haigcaroline arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT petriemarkc arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT eteibahany arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT hoodstuart arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT owenscolum arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT watkinsstuart arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT laylandjamie arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT lindsaymitchell arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT peateileen arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT raealan arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT behanmiles arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT soodarvind arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT hilliswstewart arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT mordiify arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT mahrousahmed arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT ahmednadeem arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT wilsonrebekah arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT lasallelaura arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT genereuxphilippe arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT fordian arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT berrycolin arandomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT carrickdavid randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT oldroydkeithg randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT mcentegartmargaret randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT haigcaroline randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT petriemarkc randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT eteibahany randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT hoodstuart randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT owenscolum randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT watkinsstuart randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT laylandjamie randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT lindsaymitchell randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT peateileen randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT raealan randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT behanmiles randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT soodarvind randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT hilliswstewart randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT mordiify randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT mahrousahmed randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT ahmednadeem randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT wilsonrebekah randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT lasallelaura randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT genereuxphilippe randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT fordian randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi AT berrycolin randomizedtrialofdeferredstentingversusimmediatestentingtopreventnoorslowreflowinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctiondeferstemi |