Cargando…

A multicenter quasi-experimental study: impact of a central line infection control program using auditing and performance feedback in five Belgian intensive care units

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the impact associated with an intervention based on process control and performance feedback to decrease central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates. This study was conducted from March 2011 to September 2012 in five adult intensive care units (ICU) located i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cherifi, Soraya, Gerard, Michele, Arias, Sylvie, Byl, Baudouin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24308851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-2-33
_version_ 1782317161452142592
author Cherifi, Soraya
Gerard, Michele
Arias, Sylvie
Byl, Baudouin
author_facet Cherifi, Soraya
Gerard, Michele
Arias, Sylvie
Byl, Baudouin
author_sort Cherifi, Soraya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We analyzed the impact associated with an intervention based on process control and performance feedback to decrease central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates. This study was conducted from March 2011 to September 2012 in five adult intensive care units (ICU) located in two Belgian tertiary hospitals A and B, with a total of 53 beds. METHODS: This study was divided in three phases: P1 (baseline), P2 (intervention) and P3 (post intervention). During P2, external monitoring of five central venous catheters (CVC) care critical processes and monthly reporting (meetings and feedbacks reports posted) of performance indicators (CLABSI rate, CVC utilization ratio, compliance rate with each care process, and insertion site) to ICU workers were performed. The external monitoring of process measures was assessed by the same trained research nurse. A Poisson regression analysis was used to compare CLABSI incidence density rate per phase. Statistical significance was achieved with 2-sided p-value of <0.05. For the analysis, we separated the five ICU in hospital A and B when appropriate. RESULTS: Significantly improved total mean compliance was achieved for hand hygiene, CVC handling and CVC dressing. CLABSI rate declined from 4.00 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.94-6.06) to 1.81 (0.46-3.17) per 1,000 CVC-days in P2 with an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.49 (0.24-0.98, p = 0.043). A better response was observed in hospital A where the nurse participation at the monthly meeting was significantly higher than in hospital B (p < 0.001) as the percentage of feedbacks reports posted in ICU (p < 0.001). The decline in the CLABSI rate observed during P2 in comparison with P1 was independent of the insertion site (femoral or non-femoral; p = 0.054). The overall CLABSI rate increased to 2.73 (1.17-4.29) per 1,000 CVC-days with IRR of 0.67 (0.36-1.26, p = 0.212) in P3 compared to P1, but a high nursing turnover was observed in both hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Our intervention focused on external auditing and performance feedback resulted in significant reduction in rates of CLABSI. Investigation continues regarding the most effective way to sustain CLABSI prevention practices and to improve the culture of safety in healthcare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4029143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40291432014-05-22 A multicenter quasi-experimental study: impact of a central line infection control program using auditing and performance feedback in five Belgian intensive care units Cherifi, Soraya Gerard, Michele Arias, Sylvie Byl, Baudouin Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: We analyzed the impact associated with an intervention based on process control and performance feedback to decrease central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates. This study was conducted from March 2011 to September 2012 in five adult intensive care units (ICU) located in two Belgian tertiary hospitals A and B, with a total of 53 beds. METHODS: This study was divided in three phases: P1 (baseline), P2 (intervention) and P3 (post intervention). During P2, external monitoring of five central venous catheters (CVC) care critical processes and monthly reporting (meetings and feedbacks reports posted) of performance indicators (CLABSI rate, CVC utilization ratio, compliance rate with each care process, and insertion site) to ICU workers were performed. The external monitoring of process measures was assessed by the same trained research nurse. A Poisson regression analysis was used to compare CLABSI incidence density rate per phase. Statistical significance was achieved with 2-sided p-value of <0.05. For the analysis, we separated the five ICU in hospital A and B when appropriate. RESULTS: Significantly improved total mean compliance was achieved for hand hygiene, CVC handling and CVC dressing. CLABSI rate declined from 4.00 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.94-6.06) to 1.81 (0.46-3.17) per 1,000 CVC-days in P2 with an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.49 (0.24-0.98, p = 0.043). A better response was observed in hospital A where the nurse participation at the monthly meeting was significantly higher than in hospital B (p < 0.001) as the percentage of feedbacks reports posted in ICU (p < 0.001). The decline in the CLABSI rate observed during P2 in comparison with P1 was independent of the insertion site (femoral or non-femoral; p = 0.054). The overall CLABSI rate increased to 2.73 (1.17-4.29) per 1,000 CVC-days with IRR of 0.67 (0.36-1.26, p = 0.212) in P3 compared to P1, but a high nursing turnover was observed in both hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Our intervention focused on external auditing and performance feedback resulted in significant reduction in rates of CLABSI. Investigation continues regarding the most effective way to sustain CLABSI prevention practices and to improve the culture of safety in healthcare. BioMed Central 2013-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4029143/ /pubmed/24308851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-2-33 Text en Copyright © 2013 Cherifi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Cherifi, Soraya
Gerard, Michele
Arias, Sylvie
Byl, Baudouin
A multicenter quasi-experimental study: impact of a central line infection control program using auditing and performance feedback in five Belgian intensive care units
title A multicenter quasi-experimental study: impact of a central line infection control program using auditing and performance feedback in five Belgian intensive care units
title_full A multicenter quasi-experimental study: impact of a central line infection control program using auditing and performance feedback in five Belgian intensive care units
title_fullStr A multicenter quasi-experimental study: impact of a central line infection control program using auditing and performance feedback in five Belgian intensive care units
title_full_unstemmed A multicenter quasi-experimental study: impact of a central line infection control program using auditing and performance feedback in five Belgian intensive care units
title_short A multicenter quasi-experimental study: impact of a central line infection control program using auditing and performance feedback in five Belgian intensive care units
title_sort multicenter quasi-experimental study: impact of a central line infection control program using auditing and performance feedback in five belgian intensive care units
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24308851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-2-33
work_keys_str_mv AT cherifisoraya amulticenterquasiexperimentalstudyimpactofacentrallineinfectioncontrolprogramusingauditingandperformancefeedbackinfivebelgianintensivecareunits
AT gerardmichele amulticenterquasiexperimentalstudyimpactofacentrallineinfectioncontrolprogramusingauditingandperformancefeedbackinfivebelgianintensivecareunits
AT ariassylvie amulticenterquasiexperimentalstudyimpactofacentrallineinfectioncontrolprogramusingauditingandperformancefeedbackinfivebelgianintensivecareunits
AT bylbaudouin amulticenterquasiexperimentalstudyimpactofacentrallineinfectioncontrolprogramusingauditingandperformancefeedbackinfivebelgianintensivecareunits
AT cherifisoraya multicenterquasiexperimentalstudyimpactofacentrallineinfectioncontrolprogramusingauditingandperformancefeedbackinfivebelgianintensivecareunits
AT gerardmichele multicenterquasiexperimentalstudyimpactofacentrallineinfectioncontrolprogramusingauditingandperformancefeedbackinfivebelgianintensivecareunits
AT ariassylvie multicenterquasiexperimentalstudyimpactofacentrallineinfectioncontrolprogramusingauditingandperformancefeedbackinfivebelgianintensivecareunits
AT bylbaudouin multicenterquasiexperimentalstudyimpactofacentrallineinfectioncontrolprogramusingauditingandperformancefeedbackinfivebelgianintensivecareunits