Cargando…

Papulonecrotic tuberculid—clinicopathologic and molecular features of 12 Indian patients

BACKGROUND: Papulonecrotic tuberculid (PNT) is said to be a hypersensitivity reaction to M. tuberculosis. Some reports indicate that organisms are demonstrable by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). METHODS: We describe 12 patients with PNT over 6 years. We reviewed the histopathologic features, clinic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tirumalae, Rajalakshmi, Yeliur, Inchara K., Antony, Meryl, George, Geojith, Kenneth, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Derm101.com 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24855568
http://dx.doi.org/10.5826/dpc.0402a03
_version_ 1782317177848725504
author Tirumalae, Rajalakshmi
Yeliur, Inchara K.
Antony, Meryl
George, Geojith
Kenneth, John
author_facet Tirumalae, Rajalakshmi
Yeliur, Inchara K.
Antony, Meryl
George, Geojith
Kenneth, John
author_sort Tirumalae, Rajalakshmi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Papulonecrotic tuberculid (PNT) is said to be a hypersensitivity reaction to M. tuberculosis. Some reports indicate that organisms are demonstrable by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). METHODS: We describe 12 patients with PNT over 6 years. We reviewed the histopathologic features, clinical data and follow-up. PCR for M. tuberculosis DNA was done in all cases. RESULTS: There were 7 men and 5 women. The ages ranged from 3–58 years. Upper limbs were commonly involved (8 cases). All patients had multiple papulonodular lesions, 5 showed ulceration and scarring. Mantoux test was strongly positive in all. Seven patients had systemic tuberculosis. On microscopy, necrosis was seen in 11 cases, varying from minimal to extensive. Epithelioid granulomas were common, except for 1 case with palisading and interstitial patterns. The infiltrate showed mostly lymphocytes, while 3 cases showed eosinophils. Vasculitis was seen in 8 cases. Two cases had dermal mucin, one also with interface dermatitis. This patient had concurrent LE. Mycobacterial DNA was detectable by PCR in 3 cases. Seven patients showed improvement/resolution of lesions on treatment. CONCLUSIONS: PNT is a rare disease. A positive PCR reiterates the question whether these are “tuberculids”. PNT may be better classified as true cutaneous tuberculosis and patients screened for systemic disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4029248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Derm101.com
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40292482014-05-22 Papulonecrotic tuberculid—clinicopathologic and molecular features of 12 Indian patients Tirumalae, Rajalakshmi Yeliur, Inchara K. Antony, Meryl George, Geojith Kenneth, John Dermatol Pract Concept Research BACKGROUND: Papulonecrotic tuberculid (PNT) is said to be a hypersensitivity reaction to M. tuberculosis. Some reports indicate that organisms are demonstrable by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). METHODS: We describe 12 patients with PNT over 6 years. We reviewed the histopathologic features, clinical data and follow-up. PCR for M. tuberculosis DNA was done in all cases. RESULTS: There were 7 men and 5 women. The ages ranged from 3–58 years. Upper limbs were commonly involved (8 cases). All patients had multiple papulonodular lesions, 5 showed ulceration and scarring. Mantoux test was strongly positive in all. Seven patients had systemic tuberculosis. On microscopy, necrosis was seen in 11 cases, varying from minimal to extensive. Epithelioid granulomas were common, except for 1 case with palisading and interstitial patterns. The infiltrate showed mostly lymphocytes, while 3 cases showed eosinophils. Vasculitis was seen in 8 cases. Two cases had dermal mucin, one also with interface dermatitis. This patient had concurrent LE. Mycobacterial DNA was detectable by PCR in 3 cases. Seven patients showed improvement/resolution of lesions on treatment. CONCLUSIONS: PNT is a rare disease. A positive PCR reiterates the question whether these are “tuberculids”. PNT may be better classified as true cutaneous tuberculosis and patients screened for systemic disease. Derm101.com 2014-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4029248/ /pubmed/24855568 http://dx.doi.org/10.5826/dpc.0402a03 Text en Copyright: ©2014 Tirumalae This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research
Tirumalae, Rajalakshmi
Yeliur, Inchara K.
Antony, Meryl
George, Geojith
Kenneth, John
Papulonecrotic tuberculid—clinicopathologic and molecular features of 12 Indian patients
title Papulonecrotic tuberculid—clinicopathologic and molecular features of 12 Indian patients
title_full Papulonecrotic tuberculid—clinicopathologic and molecular features of 12 Indian patients
title_fullStr Papulonecrotic tuberculid—clinicopathologic and molecular features of 12 Indian patients
title_full_unstemmed Papulonecrotic tuberculid—clinicopathologic and molecular features of 12 Indian patients
title_short Papulonecrotic tuberculid—clinicopathologic and molecular features of 12 Indian patients
title_sort papulonecrotic tuberculid—clinicopathologic and molecular features of 12 indian patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24855568
http://dx.doi.org/10.5826/dpc.0402a03
work_keys_str_mv AT tirumalaerajalakshmi papulonecrotictuberculidclinicopathologicandmolecularfeaturesof12indianpatients
AT yeliurincharak papulonecrotictuberculidclinicopathologicandmolecularfeaturesof12indianpatients
AT antonymeryl papulonecrotictuberculidclinicopathologicandmolecularfeaturesof12indianpatients
AT georgegeojith papulonecrotictuberculidclinicopathologicandmolecularfeaturesof12indianpatients
AT kennethjohn papulonecrotictuberculidclinicopathologicandmolecularfeaturesof12indianpatients