Cargando…
Ticks in the wrong boxes: assessing error in blanket-drag studies due to occasional sampling
BACKGROUND: The risk posed by ticks as vectors of disease is typically assessed by blanket-drag sampling of host-seeking individuals. Comparisons of peak abundance between plots – either in order to establish their relative risk or to identify environmental correlates – are often carried out by samp...
Autor principal: | Dobson, Andrew DM |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24321224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-6-344 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The wrong box, the body-snatcher
por: Stevenson, Robert Louis
Publicado: (1925) -
One out of ten: low sampling efficiency of cloth dragging challenges abundance estimates of questing ticks
por: Nyrhilä, Siiri, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
When the clock ticks wrong with COVID‐19
por: Papagerakis, Silvana, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Insurance Claims for Wrong-Side, Wrong-Organ, Wrong-Procedure, or Wrong-Person Surgical Errors: A Retrospective Study for 10 Years
por: Vacheron, Charles-Hervé, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Validating a common tick survey method: cloth-dragging and line transects
por: Kjellander, Pia L., et al.
Publicado: (2020)