Cargando…

Measuring Professionalism in Medicine and Nursing: Results of a European Survey

BACKGROUND: Leveraging professionalism has been put forward as a strategy to drive improvement of patient care. We investigate professionalism as a factor influencing the uptake of quality improvement activities by physicians and nurses working in European hospitals. OBJECTIVE: To (i) investigate th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H., Plochg, Thomas, Thompson, Caroline A., Arah, Onyebuchi A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24849320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097069
_version_ 1782317235411353600
author Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H.
Plochg, Thomas
Thompson, Caroline A.
Arah, Onyebuchi A.
author_facet Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H.
Plochg, Thomas
Thompson, Caroline A.
Arah, Onyebuchi A.
author_sort Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Leveraging professionalism has been put forward as a strategy to drive improvement of patient care. We investigate professionalism as a factor influencing the uptake of quality improvement activities by physicians and nurses working in European hospitals. OBJECTIVE: To (i) investigate the reliability and validity of data yielded by using the self-developed professionalism measurement tool for physicians and nurses, (ii) describe their levels of professionalism displayed, and (iii) quantify the extent to which professional attitudes would predict professional behaviors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We designed and deployed survey instruments amongst 5920 physicians and nurses working in European hospitals. This was conducted under the cross-sectional multilevel study “Deepening Our Understanding of Quality Improvement in Europe” (DUQuE). We used psychometric and generalized linear mixed modelling techniques to address the aforementioned objectives. RESULTS: In all, 2067 (response rate 69.8%) physicians and 2805 nurses (94.8%) representing 74 hospitals in 7 European countries participated. The professionalism instrument revealed five subscales of professional attitude and one scale for professional behaviour with moderate to high internal consistency and reliability. Physicians and nurses display equally high professional attitude sum scores (11.8 and 11.9 respectively out of 16) but seem to have different perceptions towards separate professionalism aspects. Lastly, professionals displaying higher levels of professional attitudes were more involved in quality improvement actions (physicians: b = 0.019, P<0.0001; nurses: b = 0.016, P<0.0001) and more inclined to report colleagues’ underperformance (physicians – odds ratio (OR) 1.12, 95% CI 1.01–1.24; nurses – OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01–1.23) or medical errors (physicians – OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01–1.23; nurses – OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.22–1.67). Involvement in QI actions was found to increase the odds of reporting incompetence or medical errors. CONCLUSION: A tool that reliably and validly measures European physicians’ and nurses’ commitment to professionalism is now available. Collectively leveraging professionalism as a quality improvement strategy may be beneficial to patient care quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4029578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40295782014-05-28 Measuring Professionalism in Medicine and Nursing: Results of a European Survey Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H. Plochg, Thomas Thompson, Caroline A. Arah, Onyebuchi A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Leveraging professionalism has been put forward as a strategy to drive improvement of patient care. We investigate professionalism as a factor influencing the uptake of quality improvement activities by physicians and nurses working in European hospitals. OBJECTIVE: To (i) investigate the reliability and validity of data yielded by using the self-developed professionalism measurement tool for physicians and nurses, (ii) describe their levels of professionalism displayed, and (iii) quantify the extent to which professional attitudes would predict professional behaviors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We designed and deployed survey instruments amongst 5920 physicians and nurses working in European hospitals. This was conducted under the cross-sectional multilevel study “Deepening Our Understanding of Quality Improvement in Europe” (DUQuE). We used psychometric and generalized linear mixed modelling techniques to address the aforementioned objectives. RESULTS: In all, 2067 (response rate 69.8%) physicians and 2805 nurses (94.8%) representing 74 hospitals in 7 European countries participated. The professionalism instrument revealed five subscales of professional attitude and one scale for professional behaviour with moderate to high internal consistency and reliability. Physicians and nurses display equally high professional attitude sum scores (11.8 and 11.9 respectively out of 16) but seem to have different perceptions towards separate professionalism aspects. Lastly, professionals displaying higher levels of professional attitudes were more involved in quality improvement actions (physicians: b = 0.019, P<0.0001; nurses: b = 0.016, P<0.0001) and more inclined to report colleagues’ underperformance (physicians – odds ratio (OR) 1.12, 95% CI 1.01–1.24; nurses – OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01–1.23) or medical errors (physicians – OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01–1.23; nurses – OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.22–1.67). Involvement in QI actions was found to increase the odds of reporting incompetence or medical errors. CONCLUSION: A tool that reliably and validly measures European physicians’ and nurses’ commitment to professionalism is now available. Collectively leveraging professionalism as a quality improvement strategy may be beneficial to patient care quality. Public Library of Science 2014-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4029578/ /pubmed/24849320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097069 Text en © 2014 Lombarts et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lombarts, Kiki M. J. M. H.
Plochg, Thomas
Thompson, Caroline A.
Arah, Onyebuchi A.
Measuring Professionalism in Medicine and Nursing: Results of a European Survey
title Measuring Professionalism in Medicine and Nursing: Results of a European Survey
title_full Measuring Professionalism in Medicine and Nursing: Results of a European Survey
title_fullStr Measuring Professionalism in Medicine and Nursing: Results of a European Survey
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Professionalism in Medicine and Nursing: Results of a European Survey
title_short Measuring Professionalism in Medicine and Nursing: Results of a European Survey
title_sort measuring professionalism in medicine and nursing: results of a european survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24849320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097069
work_keys_str_mv AT lombartskikimjmh measuringprofessionalisminmedicineandnursingresultsofaeuropeansurvey
AT plochgthomas measuringprofessionalisminmedicineandnursingresultsofaeuropeansurvey
AT thompsoncarolinea measuringprofessionalisminmedicineandnursingresultsofaeuropeansurvey
AT arahonyebuchia measuringprofessionalisminmedicineandnursingresultsofaeuropeansurvey
AT measuringprofessionalisminmedicineandnursingresultsofaeuropeansurvey