Cargando…

Window Size Impact in Human Activity Recognition

Signal segmentation is a crucial stage in the activity recognition process; however, this has been rarely and vaguely characterized so far. Windowing approaches are normally used for segmentation, but no clear consensus exists on which window size should be preferably employed. In fact, most designs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banos, Oresti, Galvez, Juan-Manuel, Damas, Miguel, Pomares, Hector, Rojas, Ignacio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24721766
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140406474
_version_ 1782317261206323200
author Banos, Oresti
Galvez, Juan-Manuel
Damas, Miguel
Pomares, Hector
Rojas, Ignacio
author_facet Banos, Oresti
Galvez, Juan-Manuel
Damas, Miguel
Pomares, Hector
Rojas, Ignacio
author_sort Banos, Oresti
collection PubMed
description Signal segmentation is a crucial stage in the activity recognition process; however, this has been rarely and vaguely characterized so far. Windowing approaches are normally used for segmentation, but no clear consensus exists on which window size should be preferably employed. In fact, most designs normally rely on figures used in previous works, but with no strict studies that support them. Intuitively, decreasing the window size allows for a faster activity detection, as well as reduced resources and energy needs. On the contrary, large data windows are normally considered for the recognition of complex activities. In this work, we present an extensive study to fairly characterize the windowing procedure, to determine its impact within the activity recognition process and to help clarify some of the habitual assumptions made during the recognition system design. To that end, some of the most widely used activity recognition procedures are evaluated for a wide range of window sizes and activities. From the evaluation, the interval 1–2 s proves to provide the best trade-off between recognition speed and accuracy. The study, specifically intended for on-body activity recognition systems, further provides designers with a set of guidelines devised to facilitate the system definition and configuration according to the particular application requirements and target activities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4029702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40297022014-05-22 Window Size Impact in Human Activity Recognition Banos, Oresti Galvez, Juan-Manuel Damas, Miguel Pomares, Hector Rojas, Ignacio Sensors (Basel) Article Signal segmentation is a crucial stage in the activity recognition process; however, this has been rarely and vaguely characterized so far. Windowing approaches are normally used for segmentation, but no clear consensus exists on which window size should be preferably employed. In fact, most designs normally rely on figures used in previous works, but with no strict studies that support them. Intuitively, decreasing the window size allows for a faster activity detection, as well as reduced resources and energy needs. On the contrary, large data windows are normally considered for the recognition of complex activities. In this work, we present an extensive study to fairly characterize the windowing procedure, to determine its impact within the activity recognition process and to help clarify some of the habitual assumptions made during the recognition system design. To that end, some of the most widely used activity recognition procedures are evaluated for a wide range of window sizes and activities. From the evaluation, the interval 1–2 s proves to provide the best trade-off between recognition speed and accuracy. The study, specifically intended for on-body activity recognition systems, further provides designers with a set of guidelines devised to facilitate the system definition and configuration according to the particular application requirements and target activities. MDPI 2014-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4029702/ /pubmed/24721766 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140406474 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Banos, Oresti
Galvez, Juan-Manuel
Damas, Miguel
Pomares, Hector
Rojas, Ignacio
Window Size Impact in Human Activity Recognition
title Window Size Impact in Human Activity Recognition
title_full Window Size Impact in Human Activity Recognition
title_fullStr Window Size Impact in Human Activity Recognition
title_full_unstemmed Window Size Impact in Human Activity Recognition
title_short Window Size Impact in Human Activity Recognition
title_sort window size impact in human activity recognition
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24721766
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140406474
work_keys_str_mv AT banosoresti windowsizeimpactinhumanactivityrecognition
AT galvezjuanmanuel windowsizeimpactinhumanactivityrecognition
AT damasmiguel windowsizeimpactinhumanactivityrecognition
AT pomareshector windowsizeimpactinhumanactivityrecognition
AT rojasignacio windowsizeimpactinhumanactivityrecognition