Cargando…

Prediction of protein interaction types based on sequence and network features

BACKGROUND: Protein interactions mediate a wide spectrum of functions in various cellular contexts. Functional versatility of protein complexes is due to a broad range of structural adaptations that determine their binding affinity, the number of interaction sites, and the lifetime. In terms of stab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goebels, Florian, Frishman, Dmitrij
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24564924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-7-S6-S5
_version_ 1782317271276847104
author Goebels, Florian
Frishman, Dmitrij
author_facet Goebels, Florian
Frishman, Dmitrij
author_sort Goebels, Florian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Protein interactions mediate a wide spectrum of functions in various cellular contexts. Functional versatility of protein complexes is due to a broad range of structural adaptations that determine their binding affinity, the number of interaction sites, and the lifetime. In terms of stability it has become customary to distinguish between obligate and non-obligate interactions dependent on whether or not the protomers can exist independently. In terms of spatio-temporal control protein interactions can be either simultaneously possible (SP) or mutually exclusive (ME). In the former case a network hub interacts with several proteins at the same time, offering each of them a separate interface, while in the latter case the hub interacts with its partners one at a time via the same binding site. So far different types of interactions were distinguished based on the properties of the corresponding binding interfaces derived from known three-dimensional structures of protein complexes. RESULTS: Here we present PiType, an accurate 3D structure-independent computational method for classifying protein interactions into simultaneously possible (SP) and mutually exclusive (ME) as well as into obligate and non-obligate. Our classifier exploits features of the binding partners predicted from amino acid sequence, their functional similarity, and network topology. We find that the constituents of non-obligate complexes possess a higher degree of structural disorder, more short linear motifs, and lower functional similarity compared to obligate interaction partners while SP and ME interactions are characterized by significant differences in network topology. Each interaction type is associated with a distinct set of biological functions. Moreover, interactions within multi-protein complexes tend to be enriched in one type of interactions. CONCLUSION: PiType does not rely on atomic structures and is thus suitable for characterizing proteome-wide interaction datasets. It can also be used to identify sub-modules within protein complexes. PiType is available for download as a self-installing package from http://webclu.bio.wzw.tum.de/PiType/PiType.zip.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4029746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40297462014-06-06 Prediction of protein interaction types based on sequence and network features Goebels, Florian Frishman, Dmitrij BMC Syst Biol Research BACKGROUND: Protein interactions mediate a wide spectrum of functions in various cellular contexts. Functional versatility of protein complexes is due to a broad range of structural adaptations that determine their binding affinity, the number of interaction sites, and the lifetime. In terms of stability it has become customary to distinguish between obligate and non-obligate interactions dependent on whether or not the protomers can exist independently. In terms of spatio-temporal control protein interactions can be either simultaneously possible (SP) or mutually exclusive (ME). In the former case a network hub interacts with several proteins at the same time, offering each of them a separate interface, while in the latter case the hub interacts with its partners one at a time via the same binding site. So far different types of interactions were distinguished based on the properties of the corresponding binding interfaces derived from known three-dimensional structures of protein complexes. RESULTS: Here we present PiType, an accurate 3D structure-independent computational method for classifying protein interactions into simultaneously possible (SP) and mutually exclusive (ME) as well as into obligate and non-obligate. Our classifier exploits features of the binding partners predicted from amino acid sequence, their functional similarity, and network topology. We find that the constituents of non-obligate complexes possess a higher degree of structural disorder, more short linear motifs, and lower functional similarity compared to obligate interaction partners while SP and ME interactions are characterized by significant differences in network topology. Each interaction type is associated with a distinct set of biological functions. Moreover, interactions within multi-protein complexes tend to be enriched in one type of interactions. CONCLUSION: PiType does not rely on atomic structures and is thus suitable for characterizing proteome-wide interaction datasets. It can also be used to identify sub-modules within protein complexes. PiType is available for download as a self-installing package from http://webclu.bio.wzw.tum.de/PiType/PiType.zip. BioMed Central 2013-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4029746/ /pubmed/24564924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-7-S6-S5 Text en Copyright © 2013 Goebels and Frishman; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Goebels, Florian
Frishman, Dmitrij
Prediction of protein interaction types based on sequence and network features
title Prediction of protein interaction types based on sequence and network features
title_full Prediction of protein interaction types based on sequence and network features
title_fullStr Prediction of protein interaction types based on sequence and network features
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of protein interaction types based on sequence and network features
title_short Prediction of protein interaction types based on sequence and network features
title_sort prediction of protein interaction types based on sequence and network features
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24564924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-7-S6-S5
work_keys_str_mv AT goebelsflorian predictionofproteininteractiontypesbasedonsequenceandnetworkfeatures
AT frishmandmitrij predictionofproteininteractiontypesbasedonsequenceandnetworkfeatures