Cargando…

Estimation of gestational age in early pregnancy from crown-rump length when gestational age range is truncated: the case study of the INTERGROWTH-21(st) Project

BACKGROUND: Fetal ultrasound scanning is considered vital for routine antenatal care with first trimester scans recommended for accurate estimation of gestational age (GA). A reliable estimate of gestational age is key information underpinning clinical care and allows estimation of expected date of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ohuma, Eric O, Papageorghiou, Aris T, Villar, Jose, Altman, Douglas G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4029763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24314232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-151
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Fetal ultrasound scanning is considered vital for routine antenatal care with first trimester scans recommended for accurate estimation of gestational age (GA). A reliable estimate of gestational age is key information underpinning clinical care and allows estimation of expected date of delivery. Fetal crown-rump length (CRL) is recommended over last menstrual period for estimating GA when measured in early pregnancy i.e. 9(+0)-13(+6) weeks. METHODS: The INTERGROWTH-21(st) Project is the largest prospective study to collect data on CRL in geographically diverse populations and with a high level of quality control measures in place. We aim to develop a new gestational age estimation equation based on the crown-rump length (CRL) from women recruited between 9(+0)-13(+6) weeks. The main statistical challenge is modelling data when the outcome variable (GA) is truncated at both ends, i.e. at 9 and 14 weeks. We explored three alternative statistical approaches to overcome the truncation of GA. To evaluate these strategies we generated a data set with no truncation of GA that was similar to the INTERGROWTH-21(st) Project CRL data, which we used to explore the performance of different methods of analysis of these data when we imposed truncation at 9 and 14 weeks of gestation. These 3 methods were first tested in a simulation based study using a previously published dating equation by Verburg et al. and evaluated how well each of them performed in relation to the model from which the data were generated. After evaluating the 3 approaches using simulated data based on the Verburg equations, the best approach will be applied to the INTERGROWTH-21(st) Project data to estimate GA from CRL. RESULTS: Results of these rather “ad hoc” statistical methods correspond very closely to the “real data” for Verburg, a data set that is similar to the INTERGROWTH-21(st) project CRL data set. CONCLUSIONS: We are confident that we can use these approaches to get reliable estimates based on INTERGROWTH-21(st) Project CRL data. These approaches may be a solution to other truncation problems involving similar data though their application to other settings would need to be evaluated.