Cargando…

Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory

BACKGROUND: Collaborative care (CC) is an organisational framework which facilitates the delivery of a mental health intervention to patients by case managers in collaboration with more senior health professionals (supervisors and GPs), and is effective for the management of depression in primary ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coupe, Nia, Anderson, Emma, Gask, Linda, Sykes, Paul, Richards, David A, Chew-Graham, Carolyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4030004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-78
_version_ 1782317313679163392
author Coupe, Nia
Anderson, Emma
Gask, Linda
Sykes, Paul
Richards, David A
Chew-Graham, Carolyn
author_facet Coupe, Nia
Anderson, Emma
Gask, Linda
Sykes, Paul
Richards, David A
Chew-Graham, Carolyn
author_sort Coupe, Nia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Collaborative care (CC) is an organisational framework which facilitates the delivery of a mental health intervention to patients by case managers in collaboration with more senior health professionals (supervisors and GPs), and is effective for the management of depression in primary care. However, there remains limited evidence on how to successfully implement this collaborative approach in UK primary care. This study aimed to explore to what extent CC impacts on professional working relationships, and if CC for depression could be implemented as routine in the primary care setting. METHODS: This qualitative study explored perspectives of the 6 case managers (CMs), 5 supervisors (trial research team members) and 15 general practitioners (GPs) from practices participating in a randomised controlled trial of CC for depression. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and data was analysed using a two-step approach using an initial thematic analysis, and a secondary analysis using the Normalisation Process Theory concepts of coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring with respect to the implementation of CC in primary care. RESULTS: Supervisors and CMs demonstrated coherence in their understanding of CC, and consequently reported good levels of cognitive participation and collective action regarding delivering and supervising the intervention. GPs interviewed showed limited understanding of the CC framework, and reported limited collaboration with CMs: barriers to collaboration were identified. All participants identified the potential or experienced benefits of a collaborative approach to depression management and were able to discuss ways in which collaboration can be facilitated. CONCLUSION: Primary care professionals in this study valued the potential for collaboration, but GPs’ understanding of CC and organisational barriers hindered opportunities for communication. Further work is needed to address these organisational barriers in order to facilitate collaboration around individual patients with depression, including shared IT systems, facilitating opportunities for informal discussion and building in formal collaboration into the CC framework. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN32829227 30/9/2008.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4030004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40300042014-05-23 Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory Coupe, Nia Anderson, Emma Gask, Linda Sykes, Paul Richards, David A Chew-Graham, Carolyn BMC Fam Pract Commentary BACKGROUND: Collaborative care (CC) is an organisational framework which facilitates the delivery of a mental health intervention to patients by case managers in collaboration with more senior health professionals (supervisors and GPs), and is effective for the management of depression in primary care. However, there remains limited evidence on how to successfully implement this collaborative approach in UK primary care. This study aimed to explore to what extent CC impacts on professional working relationships, and if CC for depression could be implemented as routine in the primary care setting. METHODS: This qualitative study explored perspectives of the 6 case managers (CMs), 5 supervisors (trial research team members) and 15 general practitioners (GPs) from practices participating in a randomised controlled trial of CC for depression. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and data was analysed using a two-step approach using an initial thematic analysis, and a secondary analysis using the Normalisation Process Theory concepts of coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring with respect to the implementation of CC in primary care. RESULTS: Supervisors and CMs demonstrated coherence in their understanding of CC, and consequently reported good levels of cognitive participation and collective action regarding delivering and supervising the intervention. GPs interviewed showed limited understanding of the CC framework, and reported limited collaboration with CMs: barriers to collaboration were identified. All participants identified the potential or experienced benefits of a collaborative approach to depression management and were able to discuss ways in which collaboration can be facilitated. CONCLUSION: Primary care professionals in this study valued the potential for collaboration, but GPs’ understanding of CC and organisational barriers hindered opportunities for communication. Further work is needed to address these organisational barriers in order to facilitate collaboration around individual patients with depression, including shared IT systems, facilitating opportunities for informal discussion and building in formal collaboration into the CC framework. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN32829227 30/9/2008. BioMed Central 2014-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4030004/ /pubmed/24885746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-78 Text en Copyright © 2014 Coupe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Coupe, Nia
Anderson, Emma
Gask, Linda
Sykes, Paul
Richards, David A
Chew-Graham, Carolyn
Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory
title Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory
title_full Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory
title_fullStr Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory
title_full_unstemmed Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory
title_short Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory
title_sort facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in uk primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4030004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-78
work_keys_str_mv AT coupenia facilitatingprofessionalliaisonincollaborativecarefordepressioninukprimarycareaqualitativestudyutilisingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT andersonemma facilitatingprofessionalliaisonincollaborativecarefordepressioninukprimarycareaqualitativestudyutilisingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT gasklinda facilitatingprofessionalliaisonincollaborativecarefordepressioninukprimarycareaqualitativestudyutilisingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT sykespaul facilitatingprofessionalliaisonincollaborativecarefordepressioninukprimarycareaqualitativestudyutilisingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT richardsdavida facilitatingprofessionalliaisonincollaborativecarefordepressioninukprimarycareaqualitativestudyutilisingnormalisationprocesstheory
AT chewgrahamcarolyn facilitatingprofessionalliaisonincollaborativecarefordepressioninukprimarycareaqualitativestudyutilisingnormalisationprocesstheory