Cargando…
Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory
BACKGROUND: Collaborative care (CC) is an organisational framework which facilitates the delivery of a mental health intervention to patients by case managers in collaboration with more senior health professionals (supervisors and GPs), and is effective for the management of depression in primary ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4030004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-78 |
_version_ | 1782317313679163392 |
---|---|
author | Coupe, Nia Anderson, Emma Gask, Linda Sykes, Paul Richards, David A Chew-Graham, Carolyn |
author_facet | Coupe, Nia Anderson, Emma Gask, Linda Sykes, Paul Richards, David A Chew-Graham, Carolyn |
author_sort | Coupe, Nia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Collaborative care (CC) is an organisational framework which facilitates the delivery of a mental health intervention to patients by case managers in collaboration with more senior health professionals (supervisors and GPs), and is effective for the management of depression in primary care. However, there remains limited evidence on how to successfully implement this collaborative approach in UK primary care. This study aimed to explore to what extent CC impacts on professional working relationships, and if CC for depression could be implemented as routine in the primary care setting. METHODS: This qualitative study explored perspectives of the 6 case managers (CMs), 5 supervisors (trial research team members) and 15 general practitioners (GPs) from practices participating in a randomised controlled trial of CC for depression. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and data was analysed using a two-step approach using an initial thematic analysis, and a secondary analysis using the Normalisation Process Theory concepts of coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring with respect to the implementation of CC in primary care. RESULTS: Supervisors and CMs demonstrated coherence in their understanding of CC, and consequently reported good levels of cognitive participation and collective action regarding delivering and supervising the intervention. GPs interviewed showed limited understanding of the CC framework, and reported limited collaboration with CMs: barriers to collaboration were identified. All participants identified the potential or experienced benefits of a collaborative approach to depression management and were able to discuss ways in which collaboration can be facilitated. CONCLUSION: Primary care professionals in this study valued the potential for collaboration, but GPs’ understanding of CC and organisational barriers hindered opportunities for communication. Further work is needed to address these organisational barriers in order to facilitate collaboration around individual patients with depression, including shared IT systems, facilitating opportunities for informal discussion and building in formal collaboration into the CC framework. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN32829227 30/9/2008. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4030004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40300042014-05-23 Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory Coupe, Nia Anderson, Emma Gask, Linda Sykes, Paul Richards, David A Chew-Graham, Carolyn BMC Fam Pract Commentary BACKGROUND: Collaborative care (CC) is an organisational framework which facilitates the delivery of a mental health intervention to patients by case managers in collaboration with more senior health professionals (supervisors and GPs), and is effective for the management of depression in primary care. However, there remains limited evidence on how to successfully implement this collaborative approach in UK primary care. This study aimed to explore to what extent CC impacts on professional working relationships, and if CC for depression could be implemented as routine in the primary care setting. METHODS: This qualitative study explored perspectives of the 6 case managers (CMs), 5 supervisors (trial research team members) and 15 general practitioners (GPs) from practices participating in a randomised controlled trial of CC for depression. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and data was analysed using a two-step approach using an initial thematic analysis, and a secondary analysis using the Normalisation Process Theory concepts of coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring with respect to the implementation of CC in primary care. RESULTS: Supervisors and CMs demonstrated coherence in their understanding of CC, and consequently reported good levels of cognitive participation and collective action regarding delivering and supervising the intervention. GPs interviewed showed limited understanding of the CC framework, and reported limited collaboration with CMs: barriers to collaboration were identified. All participants identified the potential or experienced benefits of a collaborative approach to depression management and were able to discuss ways in which collaboration can be facilitated. CONCLUSION: Primary care professionals in this study valued the potential for collaboration, but GPs’ understanding of CC and organisational barriers hindered opportunities for communication. Further work is needed to address these organisational barriers in order to facilitate collaboration around individual patients with depression, including shared IT systems, facilitating opportunities for informal discussion and building in formal collaboration into the CC framework. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN32829227 30/9/2008. BioMed Central 2014-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4030004/ /pubmed/24885746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-78 Text en Copyright © 2014 Coupe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Coupe, Nia Anderson, Emma Gask, Linda Sykes, Paul Richards, David A Chew-Graham, Carolyn Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory |
title | Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory |
title_full | Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory |
title_fullStr | Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory |
title_full_unstemmed | Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory |
title_short | Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory |
title_sort | facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in uk primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4030004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-78 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coupenia facilitatingprofessionalliaisonincollaborativecarefordepressioninukprimarycareaqualitativestudyutilisingnormalisationprocesstheory AT andersonemma facilitatingprofessionalliaisonincollaborativecarefordepressioninukprimarycareaqualitativestudyutilisingnormalisationprocesstheory AT gasklinda facilitatingprofessionalliaisonincollaborativecarefordepressioninukprimarycareaqualitativestudyutilisingnormalisationprocesstheory AT sykespaul facilitatingprofessionalliaisonincollaborativecarefordepressioninukprimarycareaqualitativestudyutilisingnormalisationprocesstheory AT richardsdavida facilitatingprofessionalliaisonincollaborativecarefordepressioninukprimarycareaqualitativestudyutilisingnormalisationprocesstheory AT chewgrahamcarolyn facilitatingprofessionalliaisonincollaborativecarefordepressioninukprimarycareaqualitativestudyutilisingnormalisationprocesstheory |