Cargando…

Incidence and severity of myofiber branching with regeneration and aging

BACKGROUND: Myofibers with an abnormal branching cytoarchitecture are commonly found in muscular dystrophy and in regenerated or aged nondystrophic muscles. Such branched myofibers from dystrophic mice are more susceptible to damage than unbranched myofibers in vitro, suggesting that muscles contain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pichavant, Christophe, Pavlath, Grace K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4030050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24855558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2044-5040-4-9
_version_ 1782317323827281920
author Pichavant, Christophe
Pavlath, Grace K
author_facet Pichavant, Christophe
Pavlath, Grace K
author_sort Pichavant, Christophe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Myofibers with an abnormal branching cytoarchitecture are commonly found in muscular dystrophy and in regenerated or aged nondystrophic muscles. Such branched myofibers from dystrophic mice are more susceptible to damage than unbranched myofibers in vitro, suggesting that muscles containing a high percentage of these myofibers are more prone to injury. Little is known about the regulation of myofiber branching. METHODS: To gain insights into the formation and fate of branched myofibers, we performed in-depth analyses of single myofibers isolated from dystrophic and nondystrophic (myotoxin-injured or aged) mouse muscles. The proportion of branched myofibers, the number of branches per myofiber and the morphology of the branches were assessed. RESULTS: Aged dystrophic mice exhibited the most severe myofiber branching as defined by the incidence of branched myofibers and the number of branches per myofiber, followed by myotoxin-injured, wild-type muscles and then aged wild-type muscles. In addition, the morphology of the branched myofibers differed among the various models. In response to either induced or ongoing muscle degeneration, branching was restricted to regenerated myofibers containing central nuclei. In myotoxin-injured muscles, the amount of branched myofibers remained stable over time. CONCLUSION: We suggest that myofiber branching is a consequence of myofiber remodeling during muscle regeneration. Our present study lays valuable groundwork for identifying the molecular pathways leading to myofiber branching in dystrophy, trauma and aging. Decreasing myofiber branching in dystrophic patients may improve muscle resistance to mechanical stress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4030050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40300502014-05-23 Incidence and severity of myofiber branching with regeneration and aging Pichavant, Christophe Pavlath, Grace K Skelet Muscle Research BACKGROUND: Myofibers with an abnormal branching cytoarchitecture are commonly found in muscular dystrophy and in regenerated or aged nondystrophic muscles. Such branched myofibers from dystrophic mice are more susceptible to damage than unbranched myofibers in vitro, suggesting that muscles containing a high percentage of these myofibers are more prone to injury. Little is known about the regulation of myofiber branching. METHODS: To gain insights into the formation and fate of branched myofibers, we performed in-depth analyses of single myofibers isolated from dystrophic and nondystrophic (myotoxin-injured or aged) mouse muscles. The proportion of branched myofibers, the number of branches per myofiber and the morphology of the branches were assessed. RESULTS: Aged dystrophic mice exhibited the most severe myofiber branching as defined by the incidence of branched myofibers and the number of branches per myofiber, followed by myotoxin-injured, wild-type muscles and then aged wild-type muscles. In addition, the morphology of the branched myofibers differed among the various models. In response to either induced or ongoing muscle degeneration, branching was restricted to regenerated myofibers containing central nuclei. In myotoxin-injured muscles, the amount of branched myofibers remained stable over time. CONCLUSION: We suggest that myofiber branching is a consequence of myofiber remodeling during muscle regeneration. Our present study lays valuable groundwork for identifying the molecular pathways leading to myofiber branching in dystrophy, trauma and aging. Decreasing myofiber branching in dystrophic patients may improve muscle resistance to mechanical stress. BioMed Central 2014-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4030050/ /pubmed/24855558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2044-5040-4-9 Text en Copyright © 2014 Pichavant and Pavlath; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Pichavant, Christophe
Pavlath, Grace K
Incidence and severity of myofiber branching with regeneration and aging
title Incidence and severity of myofiber branching with regeneration and aging
title_full Incidence and severity of myofiber branching with regeneration and aging
title_fullStr Incidence and severity of myofiber branching with regeneration and aging
title_full_unstemmed Incidence and severity of myofiber branching with regeneration and aging
title_short Incidence and severity of myofiber branching with regeneration and aging
title_sort incidence and severity of myofiber branching with regeneration and aging
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4030050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24855558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2044-5040-4-9
work_keys_str_mv AT pichavantchristophe incidenceandseverityofmyofiberbranchingwithregenerationandaging
AT pavlathgracek incidenceandseverityofmyofiberbranchingwithregenerationandaging