Cargando…

Multi-criteria decision analysis of breast cancer control in low- and middle- income countries: development of a rating tool for policy makers

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to develop a rating tool for policy makers to prioritize breast cancer interventions in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs), based on a simple multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach. The definition and identification of criteria play a key...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Venhorst, Kristie, Zelle, Sten G, Tromp, Noor, Lauer, Jeremy A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4031156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24855456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-12-13
_version_ 1782317491278577664
author Venhorst, Kristie
Zelle, Sten G
Tromp, Noor
Lauer, Jeremy A
author_facet Venhorst, Kristie
Zelle, Sten G
Tromp, Noor
Lauer, Jeremy A
author_sort Venhorst, Kristie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to develop a rating tool for policy makers to prioritize breast cancer interventions in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs), based on a simple multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach. The definition and identification of criteria play a key role in MCDA, and our rating tool could be used as part of a broader priority setting exercise in a local setting. This tool may contribute to a more transparent priority-setting process and fairer decision-making in future breast cancer policy development. METHODS: First, an expert panel (n = 5) discussed key considerations for tool development. A literature review followed to inventory all relevant criteria and construct an initial set of criteria. A Delphi study was then performed and questionnaires used to discuss a final list of criteria with clear definitions and potential scoring scales. For this Delphi study, multiple breast cancer policy and priority-setting experts from different LMICs were selected and invited by the World Health Organization. Fifteen international experts participated in all three Delphi rounds to assess and evaluate each criterion. RESULTS: This study resulted in a preliminary rating tool for assessing breast cancer interventions in LMICs. The tool consists of 10 carefully crafted criteria (effectiveness, quality of the evidence, magnitude of individual health impact, acceptability, cost-effectiveness, technical complexity, affordability, safety, geographical coverage, and accessibility), with clear definitions and potential scoring scales. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the development of a rating tool to assess breast cancer interventions in LMICs. Our tool can offer supporting knowledge for the use or development of rating tools as part of a broader (MCDA based) priority setting exercise in local settings. Further steps for improving the tool are proposed and should lead to its useful adoption in LMICs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4031156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40311562014-05-23 Multi-criteria decision analysis of breast cancer control in low- and middle- income countries: development of a rating tool for policy makers Venhorst, Kristie Zelle, Sten G Tromp, Noor Lauer, Jeremy A Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to develop a rating tool for policy makers to prioritize breast cancer interventions in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs), based on a simple multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach. The definition and identification of criteria play a key role in MCDA, and our rating tool could be used as part of a broader priority setting exercise in a local setting. This tool may contribute to a more transparent priority-setting process and fairer decision-making in future breast cancer policy development. METHODS: First, an expert panel (n = 5) discussed key considerations for tool development. A literature review followed to inventory all relevant criteria and construct an initial set of criteria. A Delphi study was then performed and questionnaires used to discuss a final list of criteria with clear definitions and potential scoring scales. For this Delphi study, multiple breast cancer policy and priority-setting experts from different LMICs were selected and invited by the World Health Organization. Fifteen international experts participated in all three Delphi rounds to assess and evaluate each criterion. RESULTS: This study resulted in a preliminary rating tool for assessing breast cancer interventions in LMICs. The tool consists of 10 carefully crafted criteria (effectiveness, quality of the evidence, magnitude of individual health impact, acceptability, cost-effectiveness, technical complexity, affordability, safety, geographical coverage, and accessibility), with clear definitions and potential scoring scales. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the development of a rating tool to assess breast cancer interventions in LMICs. Our tool can offer supporting knowledge for the use or development of rating tools as part of a broader (MCDA based) priority setting exercise in local settings. Further steps for improving the tool are proposed and should lead to its useful adoption in LMICs. BioMed Central 2014-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4031156/ /pubmed/24855456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-12-13 Text en Copyright © 2014 Venhorst et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Venhorst, Kristie
Zelle, Sten G
Tromp, Noor
Lauer, Jeremy A
Multi-criteria decision analysis of breast cancer control in low- and middle- income countries: development of a rating tool for policy makers
title Multi-criteria decision analysis of breast cancer control in low- and middle- income countries: development of a rating tool for policy makers
title_full Multi-criteria decision analysis of breast cancer control in low- and middle- income countries: development of a rating tool for policy makers
title_fullStr Multi-criteria decision analysis of breast cancer control in low- and middle- income countries: development of a rating tool for policy makers
title_full_unstemmed Multi-criteria decision analysis of breast cancer control in low- and middle- income countries: development of a rating tool for policy makers
title_short Multi-criteria decision analysis of breast cancer control in low- and middle- income countries: development of a rating tool for policy makers
title_sort multi-criteria decision analysis of breast cancer control in low- and middle- income countries: development of a rating tool for policy makers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4031156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24855456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-12-13
work_keys_str_mv AT venhorstkristie multicriteriadecisionanalysisofbreastcancercontrolinlowandmiddleincomecountriesdevelopmentofaratingtoolforpolicymakers
AT zellesteng multicriteriadecisionanalysisofbreastcancercontrolinlowandmiddleincomecountriesdevelopmentofaratingtoolforpolicymakers
AT trompnoor multicriteriadecisionanalysisofbreastcancercontrolinlowandmiddleincomecountriesdevelopmentofaratingtoolforpolicymakers
AT lauerjeremya multicriteriadecisionanalysisofbreastcancercontrolinlowandmiddleincomecountriesdevelopmentofaratingtoolforpolicymakers