Cargando…
Multi-criteria decision analysis of breast cancer control in low- and middle- income countries: development of a rating tool for policy makers
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to develop a rating tool for policy makers to prioritize breast cancer interventions in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs), based on a simple multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach. The definition and identification of criteria play a key...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4031156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24855456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-12-13 |
_version_ | 1782317491278577664 |
---|---|
author | Venhorst, Kristie Zelle, Sten G Tromp, Noor Lauer, Jeremy A |
author_facet | Venhorst, Kristie Zelle, Sten G Tromp, Noor Lauer, Jeremy A |
author_sort | Venhorst, Kristie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to develop a rating tool for policy makers to prioritize breast cancer interventions in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs), based on a simple multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach. The definition and identification of criteria play a key role in MCDA, and our rating tool could be used as part of a broader priority setting exercise in a local setting. This tool may contribute to a more transparent priority-setting process and fairer decision-making in future breast cancer policy development. METHODS: First, an expert panel (n = 5) discussed key considerations for tool development. A literature review followed to inventory all relevant criteria and construct an initial set of criteria. A Delphi study was then performed and questionnaires used to discuss a final list of criteria with clear definitions and potential scoring scales. For this Delphi study, multiple breast cancer policy and priority-setting experts from different LMICs were selected and invited by the World Health Organization. Fifteen international experts participated in all three Delphi rounds to assess and evaluate each criterion. RESULTS: This study resulted in a preliminary rating tool for assessing breast cancer interventions in LMICs. The tool consists of 10 carefully crafted criteria (effectiveness, quality of the evidence, magnitude of individual health impact, acceptability, cost-effectiveness, technical complexity, affordability, safety, geographical coverage, and accessibility), with clear definitions and potential scoring scales. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the development of a rating tool to assess breast cancer interventions in LMICs. Our tool can offer supporting knowledge for the use or development of rating tools as part of a broader (MCDA based) priority setting exercise in local settings. Further steps for improving the tool are proposed and should lead to its useful adoption in LMICs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4031156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40311562014-05-23 Multi-criteria decision analysis of breast cancer control in low- and middle- income countries: development of a rating tool for policy makers Venhorst, Kristie Zelle, Sten G Tromp, Noor Lauer, Jeremy A Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to develop a rating tool for policy makers to prioritize breast cancer interventions in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs), based on a simple multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach. The definition and identification of criteria play a key role in MCDA, and our rating tool could be used as part of a broader priority setting exercise in a local setting. This tool may contribute to a more transparent priority-setting process and fairer decision-making in future breast cancer policy development. METHODS: First, an expert panel (n = 5) discussed key considerations for tool development. A literature review followed to inventory all relevant criteria and construct an initial set of criteria. A Delphi study was then performed and questionnaires used to discuss a final list of criteria with clear definitions and potential scoring scales. For this Delphi study, multiple breast cancer policy and priority-setting experts from different LMICs were selected and invited by the World Health Organization. Fifteen international experts participated in all three Delphi rounds to assess and evaluate each criterion. RESULTS: This study resulted in a preliminary rating tool for assessing breast cancer interventions in LMICs. The tool consists of 10 carefully crafted criteria (effectiveness, quality of the evidence, magnitude of individual health impact, acceptability, cost-effectiveness, technical complexity, affordability, safety, geographical coverage, and accessibility), with clear definitions and potential scoring scales. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the development of a rating tool to assess breast cancer interventions in LMICs. Our tool can offer supporting knowledge for the use or development of rating tools as part of a broader (MCDA based) priority setting exercise in local settings. Further steps for improving the tool are proposed and should lead to its useful adoption in LMICs. BioMed Central 2014-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4031156/ /pubmed/24855456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-12-13 Text en Copyright © 2014 Venhorst et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Venhorst, Kristie Zelle, Sten G Tromp, Noor Lauer, Jeremy A Multi-criteria decision analysis of breast cancer control in low- and middle- income countries: development of a rating tool for policy makers |
title | Multi-criteria decision analysis of breast cancer control in low- and middle- income countries: development of a rating tool for policy makers |
title_full | Multi-criteria decision analysis of breast cancer control in low- and middle- income countries: development of a rating tool for policy makers |
title_fullStr | Multi-criteria decision analysis of breast cancer control in low- and middle- income countries: development of a rating tool for policy makers |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi-criteria decision analysis of breast cancer control in low- and middle- income countries: development of a rating tool for policy makers |
title_short | Multi-criteria decision analysis of breast cancer control in low- and middle- income countries: development of a rating tool for policy makers |
title_sort | multi-criteria decision analysis of breast cancer control in low- and middle- income countries: development of a rating tool for policy makers |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4031156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24855456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-12-13 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT venhorstkristie multicriteriadecisionanalysisofbreastcancercontrolinlowandmiddleincomecountriesdevelopmentofaratingtoolforpolicymakers AT zellesteng multicriteriadecisionanalysisofbreastcancercontrolinlowandmiddleincomecountriesdevelopmentofaratingtoolforpolicymakers AT trompnoor multicriteriadecisionanalysisofbreastcancercontrolinlowandmiddleincomecountriesdevelopmentofaratingtoolforpolicymakers AT lauerjeremya multicriteriadecisionanalysisofbreastcancercontrolinlowandmiddleincomecountriesdevelopmentofaratingtoolforpolicymakers |