Cargando…

Saving time and money: a validation of the self ratings on the prospective NIMH life-chart method (NIMH-LCM)

BACKGROUND: Careful observation of the longitudinal course of bipolar disorders is pivotal to finding optimal treatments and improving outcome. A useful tool is the daily prospective Life-Chart Method, developed by the National Institute of Mental Health. However, it remains unclear whether the pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Born, Christoph, Amann, Benedikt L, Grunze, Heinz, Post, Robert M, Schärer, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4031162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24886463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-130
_version_ 1782317492796915712
author Born, Christoph
Amann, Benedikt L
Grunze, Heinz
Post, Robert M
Schärer, Lars
author_facet Born, Christoph
Amann, Benedikt L
Grunze, Heinz
Post, Robert M
Schärer, Lars
author_sort Born, Christoph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Careful observation of the longitudinal course of bipolar disorders is pivotal to finding optimal treatments and improving outcome. A useful tool is the daily prospective Life-Chart Method, developed by the National Institute of Mental Health. However, it remains unclear whether the patient version is as valid as the clinician version. METHODS: We compared the patient-rated version of the Lifechart (LC-self) with the Young-Mania-Rating Scale (YMRS), Inventory of Depressive Symptoms–Clinician version (IDS-C), and Clinical Global Impression–Bipolar version (CGI-BP) in 108 bipolar I and II patients who participated in the Naturalistic Follow-up Study (NFS) of the German centres of the Bipolar Collaborative Network (BCN; formerly Stanley Foundation Bipolar Network). For statistical evaluation, levels of severity of mood states on the Lifechart were transformed numerically and comparison with affective scales was performed using chi-square and t tests. For testing correlations Pearson´s coefficient was calculated. RESULTS: Ratings for depression of LC-self and total scores of IDS-C were found to be highly correlated (Pearson coefficient r = −.718; p < .001), whilst the correlation of ratings for mania with YMRS compared to LC-self were slightly less robust (Pearson coefficient r = .491; p = .001). These results were confirmed by good correlations between the CGI-BP IA (mania), IB (depression) and IC (overall mood state) and the LC-self ratings (Pearson coefficient r = .488, r = .721 and r = .65, respectively; all p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The LC-self shows a significant correlation and good concordance with standard cross sectional affective rating scales, suggesting that the LC-self is a valid and time and money saving alternative to the clinician-rated version which should be incorporated in future clinical research in bipolar disorder. Generalizability of the results is limited by the selection of highly motivated patients in specialized bipolar centres and by the open design of the study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4031162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40311622014-05-23 Saving time and money: a validation of the self ratings on the prospective NIMH life-chart method (NIMH-LCM) Born, Christoph Amann, Benedikt L Grunze, Heinz Post, Robert M Schärer, Lars BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Careful observation of the longitudinal course of bipolar disorders is pivotal to finding optimal treatments and improving outcome. A useful tool is the daily prospective Life-Chart Method, developed by the National Institute of Mental Health. However, it remains unclear whether the patient version is as valid as the clinician version. METHODS: We compared the patient-rated version of the Lifechart (LC-self) with the Young-Mania-Rating Scale (YMRS), Inventory of Depressive Symptoms–Clinician version (IDS-C), and Clinical Global Impression–Bipolar version (CGI-BP) in 108 bipolar I and II patients who participated in the Naturalistic Follow-up Study (NFS) of the German centres of the Bipolar Collaborative Network (BCN; formerly Stanley Foundation Bipolar Network). For statistical evaluation, levels of severity of mood states on the Lifechart were transformed numerically and comparison with affective scales was performed using chi-square and t tests. For testing correlations Pearson´s coefficient was calculated. RESULTS: Ratings for depression of LC-self and total scores of IDS-C were found to be highly correlated (Pearson coefficient r = −.718; p < .001), whilst the correlation of ratings for mania with YMRS compared to LC-self were slightly less robust (Pearson coefficient r = .491; p = .001). These results were confirmed by good correlations between the CGI-BP IA (mania), IB (depression) and IC (overall mood state) and the LC-self ratings (Pearson coefficient r = .488, r = .721 and r = .65, respectively; all p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The LC-self shows a significant correlation and good concordance with standard cross sectional affective rating scales, suggesting that the LC-self is a valid and time and money saving alternative to the clinician-rated version which should be incorporated in future clinical research in bipolar disorder. Generalizability of the results is limited by the selection of highly motivated patients in specialized bipolar centres and by the open design of the study. BioMed Central 2014-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4031162/ /pubmed/24886463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-130 Text en Copyright © 2014 Born et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Born, Christoph
Amann, Benedikt L
Grunze, Heinz
Post, Robert M
Schärer, Lars
Saving time and money: a validation of the self ratings on the prospective NIMH life-chart method (NIMH-LCM)
title Saving time and money: a validation of the self ratings on the prospective NIMH life-chart method (NIMH-LCM)
title_full Saving time and money: a validation of the self ratings on the prospective NIMH life-chart method (NIMH-LCM)
title_fullStr Saving time and money: a validation of the self ratings on the prospective NIMH life-chart method (NIMH-LCM)
title_full_unstemmed Saving time and money: a validation of the self ratings on the prospective NIMH life-chart method (NIMH-LCM)
title_short Saving time and money: a validation of the self ratings on the prospective NIMH life-chart method (NIMH-LCM)
title_sort saving time and money: a validation of the self ratings on the prospective nimh life-chart method (nimh-lcm)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4031162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24886463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-130
work_keys_str_mv AT bornchristoph savingtimeandmoneyavalidationoftheselfratingsontheprospectivenimhlifechartmethodnimhlcm
AT amannbenediktl savingtimeandmoneyavalidationoftheselfratingsontheprospectivenimhlifechartmethodnimhlcm
AT grunzeheinz savingtimeandmoneyavalidationoftheselfratingsontheprospectivenimhlifechartmethodnimhlcm
AT postrobertm savingtimeandmoneyavalidationoftheselfratingsontheprospectivenimhlifechartmethodnimhlcm
AT scharerlars savingtimeandmoneyavalidationoftheselfratingsontheprospectivenimhlifechartmethodnimhlcm