Cargando…
Optimized outcome prediction in breast cancer by combining the 70-gene signature with clinical risk prediction algorithms
Clinical guidelines for breast cancer treatment differ in their selection of patients at a high risk of recurrence who are eligible to receive adjuvant systemic treatment (AST). The 70-gene signature is a molecular tool to better guide AST decisions. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether add...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4031388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24760482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2954-2 |
_version_ | 1782317525827059712 |
---|---|
author | Drukker, C. A. Nijenhuis, M. V. Bueno-de-Mesquita, J. M. Retèl, V. P. van Harten, W. H. van Tinteren, H. Wesseling, J. Schmidt, M. K. van’t Veer, L. J. Sonke, G. S. Rutgers, E. J. T. van de Vijver, M. J. Linn, S. C. |
author_facet | Drukker, C. A. Nijenhuis, M. V. Bueno-de-Mesquita, J. M. Retèl, V. P. van Harten, W. H. van Tinteren, H. Wesseling, J. Schmidt, M. K. van’t Veer, L. J. Sonke, G. S. Rutgers, E. J. T. van de Vijver, M. J. Linn, S. C. |
author_sort | Drukker, C. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical guidelines for breast cancer treatment differ in their selection of patients at a high risk of recurrence who are eligible to receive adjuvant systemic treatment (AST). The 70-gene signature is a molecular tool to better guide AST decisions. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether adding the 70-gene signature to clinical risk prediction algorithms can optimize outcome prediction and consequently treatment decisions in early stage, node-negative breast cancer patients. A 70-gene signature was available for 427 patients participating in the RASTER study (cT1-3N0M0). Median follow-up was 61.6 months. Based on 5-year distant-recurrence free interval (DRFI) probabilities survival areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated and compared for risk estimations based on the six clinical risk prediction algorithms: Adjuvant! Online (AOL), Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI), St. Gallen (2003), the Dutch National guidelines (CBO 2004 and NABON 2012), and PREDICT plus. Also, survival AUC were calculated after adding the 70-gene signature to these clinical risk estimations. Systemically untreated patients with a high clinical risk estimation but a low risk 70-gene signature had an excellent 5-year DRFI varying between 97.1 and 100 %, depending on the clinical risk prediction algorithms used in the comparison. The best risk estimation was obtained in this cohort by adding the 70-gene signature to CBO 2012 (AUC: 0.644) and PREDICT (AUC: 0.662). Clinical risk estimations by all clinical algorithms improved by adding the 70-gene signature. Patients with a low risk 70-gene signature have an excellent survival, independent of their clinical risk estimation. Adding the 70-gene signature to clinical risk prediction algorithms improves risk estimations and therefore might improve the identification of early stage node-negative breast cancer patients for whom AST has limited value. In this cohort, the PREDICT plus tool in combination with the 70-gene signature provided the best risk prediction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10549-014-2954-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4031388 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40313882014-05-23 Optimized outcome prediction in breast cancer by combining the 70-gene signature with clinical risk prediction algorithms Drukker, C. A. Nijenhuis, M. V. Bueno-de-Mesquita, J. M. Retèl, V. P. van Harten, W. H. van Tinteren, H. Wesseling, J. Schmidt, M. K. van’t Veer, L. J. Sonke, G. S. Rutgers, E. J. T. van de Vijver, M. J. Linn, S. C. Breast Cancer Res Treat Clinical Trial Clinical guidelines for breast cancer treatment differ in their selection of patients at a high risk of recurrence who are eligible to receive adjuvant systemic treatment (AST). The 70-gene signature is a molecular tool to better guide AST decisions. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether adding the 70-gene signature to clinical risk prediction algorithms can optimize outcome prediction and consequently treatment decisions in early stage, node-negative breast cancer patients. A 70-gene signature was available for 427 patients participating in the RASTER study (cT1-3N0M0). Median follow-up was 61.6 months. Based on 5-year distant-recurrence free interval (DRFI) probabilities survival areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated and compared for risk estimations based on the six clinical risk prediction algorithms: Adjuvant! Online (AOL), Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI), St. Gallen (2003), the Dutch National guidelines (CBO 2004 and NABON 2012), and PREDICT plus. Also, survival AUC were calculated after adding the 70-gene signature to these clinical risk estimations. Systemically untreated patients with a high clinical risk estimation but a low risk 70-gene signature had an excellent 5-year DRFI varying between 97.1 and 100 %, depending on the clinical risk prediction algorithms used in the comparison. The best risk estimation was obtained in this cohort by adding the 70-gene signature to CBO 2012 (AUC: 0.644) and PREDICT (AUC: 0.662). Clinical risk estimations by all clinical algorithms improved by adding the 70-gene signature. Patients with a low risk 70-gene signature have an excellent survival, independent of their clinical risk estimation. Adding the 70-gene signature to clinical risk prediction algorithms improves risk estimations and therefore might improve the identification of early stage node-negative breast cancer patients for whom AST has limited value. In this cohort, the PREDICT plus tool in combination with the 70-gene signature provided the best risk prediction. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10549-014-2954-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2014-04-24 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4031388/ /pubmed/24760482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2954-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trial Drukker, C. A. Nijenhuis, M. V. Bueno-de-Mesquita, J. M. Retèl, V. P. van Harten, W. H. van Tinteren, H. Wesseling, J. Schmidt, M. K. van’t Veer, L. J. Sonke, G. S. Rutgers, E. J. T. van de Vijver, M. J. Linn, S. C. Optimized outcome prediction in breast cancer by combining the 70-gene signature with clinical risk prediction algorithms |
title | Optimized outcome prediction in breast cancer by combining the 70-gene signature with clinical risk prediction algorithms |
title_full | Optimized outcome prediction in breast cancer by combining the 70-gene signature with clinical risk prediction algorithms |
title_fullStr | Optimized outcome prediction in breast cancer by combining the 70-gene signature with clinical risk prediction algorithms |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimized outcome prediction in breast cancer by combining the 70-gene signature with clinical risk prediction algorithms |
title_short | Optimized outcome prediction in breast cancer by combining the 70-gene signature with clinical risk prediction algorithms |
title_sort | optimized outcome prediction in breast cancer by combining the 70-gene signature with clinical risk prediction algorithms |
topic | Clinical Trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4031388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24760482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2954-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT drukkerca optimizedoutcomepredictioninbreastcancerbycombiningthe70genesignaturewithclinicalriskpredictionalgorithms AT nijenhuismv optimizedoutcomepredictioninbreastcancerbycombiningthe70genesignaturewithclinicalriskpredictionalgorithms AT buenodemesquitajm optimizedoutcomepredictioninbreastcancerbycombiningthe70genesignaturewithclinicalriskpredictionalgorithms AT retelvp optimizedoutcomepredictioninbreastcancerbycombiningthe70genesignaturewithclinicalriskpredictionalgorithms AT vanhartenwh optimizedoutcomepredictioninbreastcancerbycombiningthe70genesignaturewithclinicalriskpredictionalgorithms AT vantinterenh optimizedoutcomepredictioninbreastcancerbycombiningthe70genesignaturewithclinicalriskpredictionalgorithms AT wesselingj optimizedoutcomepredictioninbreastcancerbycombiningthe70genesignaturewithclinicalriskpredictionalgorithms AT schmidtmk optimizedoutcomepredictioninbreastcancerbycombiningthe70genesignaturewithclinicalriskpredictionalgorithms AT vantveerlj optimizedoutcomepredictioninbreastcancerbycombiningthe70genesignaturewithclinicalriskpredictionalgorithms AT sonkegs optimizedoutcomepredictioninbreastcancerbycombiningthe70genesignaturewithclinicalriskpredictionalgorithms AT rutgersejt optimizedoutcomepredictioninbreastcancerbycombiningthe70genesignaturewithclinicalriskpredictionalgorithms AT vandevijvermj optimizedoutcomepredictioninbreastcancerbycombiningthe70genesignaturewithclinicalriskpredictionalgorithms AT linnsc optimizedoutcomepredictioninbreastcancerbycombiningthe70genesignaturewithclinicalriskpredictionalgorithms |