Cargando…

Effectiveness of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Chest pain is the second most common reason patients visit emergency departments (EDs) and often results in very low-risk patients being admitted for prolonged observation and advanced cardiac testing. Shared decision-making, including educating patients regarding their 45-day risk for a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, Ryan T, Montori, Victor M, Shah, Nilay D, Ting, Henry H, Pencille, Laurie J, Demers, Michel, Kline, Jeffrey A, Diercks, Deborah B, Hollander, Judd E, Torres, Carlos A, Schaffer, Jason T, Herrin, Jeph, Branda, Megan, Leblanc, Annie, Hess, Erik P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4031497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-166
_version_ 1782317540639244288
author Anderson, Ryan T
Montori, Victor M
Shah, Nilay D
Ting, Henry H
Pencille, Laurie J
Demers, Michel
Kline, Jeffrey A
Diercks, Deborah B
Hollander, Judd E
Torres, Carlos A
Schaffer, Jason T
Herrin, Jeph
Branda, Megan
Leblanc, Annie
Hess, Erik P
author_facet Anderson, Ryan T
Montori, Victor M
Shah, Nilay D
Ting, Henry H
Pencille, Laurie J
Demers, Michel
Kline, Jeffrey A
Diercks, Deborah B
Hollander, Judd E
Torres, Carlos A
Schaffer, Jason T
Herrin, Jeph
Branda, Megan
Leblanc, Annie
Hess, Erik P
author_sort Anderson, Ryan T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chest pain is the second most common reason patients visit emergency departments (EDs) and often results in very low-risk patients being admitted for prolonged observation and advanced cardiac testing. Shared decision-making, including educating patients regarding their 45-day risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and management options, might safely decrease healthcare utilization. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a protocol for a multicenter practical patient-level randomized trial to compare an intervention group receiving a decision aid, Chest Pain Choice (CPC), to a control group receiving usual care. Adults presenting to five geographically and ethnically diverse EDs who are being considered for admission for observation and advanced cardiac testing will be eligible for enrollment. We will measure the effect of CPC on (1) patient knowledge regarding their 45-day risk for ACS and the available management options (primary outcome); (2) patient engagement in the decision-making process; (3) the degree of conflict patients experience related to feeling uninformed (decisional conflict); (4) patient and clinician satisfaction with the decision made; (5) the rate of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days; (6) the proportion of patients admitted for advanced cardiac testing; and (7) healthcare utilization. To assess these outcomes, we will administer patient and clinician surveys immediately after each clinical encounter, obtain video recordings of the patient-clinician discussion, administer a patient healthcare utilization diary, analyze hospital billing records, review the electronic medical record, and conduct telephone follow-up. DISCUSSION: This multicenter trial will robustly assess the effectiveness of a decision aid on patient-centered outcomes, safety, and healthcare utilization in low-risk chest pain patients from a variety of geographically and ethnically diverse EDs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01969240.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4031497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40314972014-05-24 Effectiveness of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial Anderson, Ryan T Montori, Victor M Shah, Nilay D Ting, Henry H Pencille, Laurie J Demers, Michel Kline, Jeffrey A Diercks, Deborah B Hollander, Judd E Torres, Carlos A Schaffer, Jason T Herrin, Jeph Branda, Megan Leblanc, Annie Hess, Erik P Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Chest pain is the second most common reason patients visit emergency departments (EDs) and often results in very low-risk patients being admitted for prolonged observation and advanced cardiac testing. Shared decision-making, including educating patients regarding their 45-day risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and management options, might safely decrease healthcare utilization. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a protocol for a multicenter practical patient-level randomized trial to compare an intervention group receiving a decision aid, Chest Pain Choice (CPC), to a control group receiving usual care. Adults presenting to five geographically and ethnically diverse EDs who are being considered for admission for observation and advanced cardiac testing will be eligible for enrollment. We will measure the effect of CPC on (1) patient knowledge regarding their 45-day risk for ACS and the available management options (primary outcome); (2) patient engagement in the decision-making process; (3) the degree of conflict patients experience related to feeling uninformed (decisional conflict); (4) patient and clinician satisfaction with the decision made; (5) the rate of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days; (6) the proportion of patients admitted for advanced cardiac testing; and (7) healthcare utilization. To assess these outcomes, we will administer patient and clinician surveys immediately after each clinical encounter, obtain video recordings of the patient-clinician discussion, administer a patient healthcare utilization diary, analyze hospital billing records, review the electronic medical record, and conduct telephone follow-up. DISCUSSION: This multicenter trial will robustly assess the effectiveness of a decision aid on patient-centered outcomes, safety, and healthcare utilization in low-risk chest pain patients from a variety of geographically and ethnically diverse EDs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01969240. BioMed Central 2014-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4031497/ /pubmed/24884807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-166 Text en Copyright © 2014 Anderson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Anderson, Ryan T
Montori, Victor M
Shah, Nilay D
Ting, Henry H
Pencille, Laurie J
Demers, Michel
Kline, Jeffrey A
Diercks, Deborah B
Hollander, Judd E
Torres, Carlos A
Schaffer, Jason T
Herrin, Jeph
Branda, Megan
Leblanc, Annie
Hess, Erik P
Effectiveness of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial
title Effectiveness of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial
title_full Effectiveness of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial
title_short Effectiveness of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial
title_sort effectiveness of the chest pain choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4031497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-166
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonryant effectivenessofthechestpainchoicedecisionaidinemergencydepartmentpatientswithlowriskchestpainstudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT montorivictorm effectivenessofthechestpainchoicedecisionaidinemergencydepartmentpatientswithlowriskchestpainstudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT shahnilayd effectivenessofthechestpainchoicedecisionaidinemergencydepartmentpatientswithlowriskchestpainstudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT tinghenryh effectivenessofthechestpainchoicedecisionaidinemergencydepartmentpatientswithlowriskchestpainstudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT pencillelauriej effectivenessofthechestpainchoicedecisionaidinemergencydepartmentpatientswithlowriskchestpainstudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT demersmichel effectivenessofthechestpainchoicedecisionaidinemergencydepartmentpatientswithlowriskchestpainstudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT klinejeffreya effectivenessofthechestpainchoicedecisionaidinemergencydepartmentpatientswithlowriskchestpainstudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT diercksdeborahb effectivenessofthechestpainchoicedecisionaidinemergencydepartmentpatientswithlowriskchestpainstudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT hollanderjudde effectivenessofthechestpainchoicedecisionaidinemergencydepartmentpatientswithlowriskchestpainstudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT torrescarlosa effectivenessofthechestpainchoicedecisionaidinemergencydepartmentpatientswithlowriskchestpainstudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT schafferjasont effectivenessofthechestpainchoicedecisionaidinemergencydepartmentpatientswithlowriskchestpainstudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT herrinjeph effectivenessofthechestpainchoicedecisionaidinemergencydepartmentpatientswithlowriskchestpainstudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT brandamegan effectivenessofthechestpainchoicedecisionaidinemergencydepartmentpatientswithlowriskchestpainstudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT leblancannie effectivenessofthechestpainchoicedecisionaidinemergencydepartmentpatientswithlowriskchestpainstudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedtrial
AT hesserikp effectivenessofthechestpainchoicedecisionaidinemergencydepartmentpatientswithlowriskchestpainstudyprotocolforamulticenterrandomizedtrial