Cargando…

Impact of tongue biofilm removal on mechanically ventilated patients

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a tongue cleaner in the removal of tongue biofilm in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: Tongue biofilm and tracheal secretion samples were collected from a total of 50 patients: 27 in the study group (SG) who were intubated or tracheostomized under...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santos, Paulo Sérgio da Silva, Mariano, Marcelo, Kallas, Monira Samaan, Vilela, Maria Carolina Nunes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Brasileira de Medicina intensiva 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4031859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23887759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-507X2013000100009
_version_ 1782317574536560640
author Santos, Paulo Sérgio da Silva
Mariano, Marcelo
Kallas, Monira Samaan
Vilela, Maria Carolina Nunes
author_facet Santos, Paulo Sérgio da Silva
Mariano, Marcelo
Kallas, Monira Samaan
Vilela, Maria Carolina Nunes
author_sort Santos, Paulo Sérgio da Silva
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a tongue cleaner in the removal of tongue biofilm in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: Tongue biofilm and tracheal secretion samples were collected from a total of 50 patients: 27 in the study group (SG) who were intubated or tracheostomized under assisted ventilation and treated with the tongue cleaner and 23 in the control group (CG) who did not undergo tongue cleaning. Oral and tracheal secretion cultures of the SG (initially and after 5 days) and the CG (at a single time-point) were performed to evaluate the changes in bacterial flora. RESULTS: The median age of the SG patients was 77 years (45-99 years), and that of the CG patients was 79 years (21-94 years). The length of hospital stay ranged from 17-1,370 days for the SG with a median stay of 425 days and from 4-240 days for the CG with a median stay of 120 days. No significant differences were found when the dental plaque indexes were compared between the SG and the CG. There was no correlation between the index and the length of hospital stay. The same bacterial flora was found in the dental plaque of 9 of the 27 SG patients before and after the tongue scraper was used for 5 days compared with the CG (p=0.683). Overall, 7 of the 27 SG patients had positive bacterial cultures for the same strains in both tongue biofilm and tracheal secretions compared with the CG (p=0.003). Significant similarities in strain resistance and susceptibility of the assessed microorganisms were observed between oral and tracheal microflora in 6/23 cases in the CG (p=0.006). CONCLUSION: The use of a tongue cleaner is effective at reducing tongue biofilm in patients on mechanical ventilation and facilitates oral hygiene interventions performed by caregivers. Clinical Trials Registry NCT01294943
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4031859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Associação Brasileira de Medicina intensiva
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40318592014-06-02 Impact of tongue biofilm removal on mechanically ventilated patients Santos, Paulo Sérgio da Silva Mariano, Marcelo Kallas, Monira Samaan Vilela, Maria Carolina Nunes Rev Bras Ter Intensiva Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a tongue cleaner in the removal of tongue biofilm in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: Tongue biofilm and tracheal secretion samples were collected from a total of 50 patients: 27 in the study group (SG) who were intubated or tracheostomized under assisted ventilation and treated with the tongue cleaner and 23 in the control group (CG) who did not undergo tongue cleaning. Oral and tracheal secretion cultures of the SG (initially and after 5 days) and the CG (at a single time-point) were performed to evaluate the changes in bacterial flora. RESULTS: The median age of the SG patients was 77 years (45-99 years), and that of the CG patients was 79 years (21-94 years). The length of hospital stay ranged from 17-1,370 days for the SG with a median stay of 425 days and from 4-240 days for the CG with a median stay of 120 days. No significant differences were found when the dental plaque indexes were compared between the SG and the CG. There was no correlation between the index and the length of hospital stay. The same bacterial flora was found in the dental plaque of 9 of the 27 SG patients before and after the tongue scraper was used for 5 days compared with the CG (p=0.683). Overall, 7 of the 27 SG patients had positive bacterial cultures for the same strains in both tongue biofilm and tracheal secretions compared with the CG (p=0.003). Significant similarities in strain resistance and susceptibility of the assessed microorganisms were observed between oral and tracheal microflora in 6/23 cases in the CG (p=0.006). CONCLUSION: The use of a tongue cleaner is effective at reducing tongue biofilm in patients on mechanical ventilation and facilitates oral hygiene interventions performed by caregivers. Clinical Trials Registry NCT01294943 Associação Brasileira de Medicina intensiva 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC4031859/ /pubmed/23887759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-507X2013000100009 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Santos, Paulo Sérgio da Silva
Mariano, Marcelo
Kallas, Monira Samaan
Vilela, Maria Carolina Nunes
Impact of tongue biofilm removal on mechanically ventilated patients
title Impact of tongue biofilm removal on mechanically ventilated patients
title_full Impact of tongue biofilm removal on mechanically ventilated patients
title_fullStr Impact of tongue biofilm removal on mechanically ventilated patients
title_full_unstemmed Impact of tongue biofilm removal on mechanically ventilated patients
title_short Impact of tongue biofilm removal on mechanically ventilated patients
title_sort impact of tongue biofilm removal on mechanically ventilated patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4031859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23887759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-507X2013000100009
work_keys_str_mv AT santospaulosergiodasilva impactoftonguebiofilmremovalonmechanicallyventilatedpatients
AT marianomarcelo impactoftonguebiofilmremovalonmechanicallyventilatedpatients
AT kallasmonirasamaan impactoftonguebiofilmremovalonmechanicallyventilatedpatients
AT vilelamariacarolinanunes impactoftonguebiofilmremovalonmechanicallyventilatedpatients