Cargando…

Comparing Farmers’ Market Revenue Trends Before and After the Implementation of a Monetary Incentive for Recipients of Food Assistance

INTRODUCTION: We examined the influence of an intervention to increase fruit and vegetable purchases at farmers’ markets for recipients of food assistance, Shop N Save (SNS), on revenue trends at a farmers’ market located at a federally qualified health center (FQHC) in rural South Carolina. We comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freedman, Darcy A., Mattison-Faye, Amy, Alia, Kassandra, Guest, M. Aaron, Hébert, James R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4032058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24854238
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130347
_version_ 1782317593243156480
author Freedman, Darcy A.
Mattison-Faye, Amy
Alia, Kassandra
Guest, M. Aaron
Hébert, James R.
author_facet Freedman, Darcy A.
Mattison-Faye, Amy
Alia, Kassandra
Guest, M. Aaron
Hébert, James R.
author_sort Freedman, Darcy A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We examined the influence of an intervention to increase fruit and vegetable purchases at farmers’ markets for recipients of food assistance, Shop N Save (SNS), on revenue trends at a farmers’ market located at a federally qualified health center (FQHC) in rural South Carolina. We compared revenue trends for 20 weeks before the intervention (2011) and 20 weeks after (2012). METHODS: SNS provided one $5 monetary incentive per week to customers spending $5 or more in food assistance at the farmers’ market. SNS was available to any farmers’ market customer using Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), and/or Senior or WIC Farmers’ Market Nutrition Program (FMNP) vouchers. Sales receipts were recorded for each transaction at the farmers’ market to document payment type and the cost of the purchase. All SNS participants completed a one-time enrollment survey. RESULTS: A total of 336 customers self-enrolled in SNS from June through October 2012. Most SNS participants were female, African American, and patients at the FQHC. In total, the use of all forms of food assistance (SNAP, WIC, and FMNP) at the farmers’ market increased significantly after the intervention (from 10% before, to 25% after, P = .003). Senior FMNP vouchers and SNAP usage increased the most. CONCLUSION: Interventions that provide incentives to recipients of food assistance programs at farmers’ markets are a viable strategy for increasing food assistance usage and revenue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4032058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40320582014-05-29 Comparing Farmers’ Market Revenue Trends Before and After the Implementation of a Monetary Incentive for Recipients of Food Assistance Freedman, Darcy A. Mattison-Faye, Amy Alia, Kassandra Guest, M. Aaron Hébert, James R. Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: We examined the influence of an intervention to increase fruit and vegetable purchases at farmers’ markets for recipients of food assistance, Shop N Save (SNS), on revenue trends at a farmers’ market located at a federally qualified health center (FQHC) in rural South Carolina. We compared revenue trends for 20 weeks before the intervention (2011) and 20 weeks after (2012). METHODS: SNS provided one $5 monetary incentive per week to customers spending $5 or more in food assistance at the farmers’ market. SNS was available to any farmers’ market customer using Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), and/or Senior or WIC Farmers’ Market Nutrition Program (FMNP) vouchers. Sales receipts were recorded for each transaction at the farmers’ market to document payment type and the cost of the purchase. All SNS participants completed a one-time enrollment survey. RESULTS: A total of 336 customers self-enrolled in SNS from June through October 2012. Most SNS participants were female, African American, and patients at the FQHC. In total, the use of all forms of food assistance (SNAP, WIC, and FMNP) at the farmers’ market increased significantly after the intervention (from 10% before, to 25% after, P = .003). Senior FMNP vouchers and SNAP usage increased the most. CONCLUSION: Interventions that provide incentives to recipients of food assistance programs at farmers’ markets are a viable strategy for increasing food assistance usage and revenue. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2014-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4032058/ /pubmed/24854238 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130347 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Freedman, Darcy A.
Mattison-Faye, Amy
Alia, Kassandra
Guest, M. Aaron
Hébert, James R.
Comparing Farmers’ Market Revenue Trends Before and After the Implementation of a Monetary Incentive for Recipients of Food Assistance
title Comparing Farmers’ Market Revenue Trends Before and After the Implementation of a Monetary Incentive for Recipients of Food Assistance
title_full Comparing Farmers’ Market Revenue Trends Before and After the Implementation of a Monetary Incentive for Recipients of Food Assistance
title_fullStr Comparing Farmers’ Market Revenue Trends Before and After the Implementation of a Monetary Incentive for Recipients of Food Assistance
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Farmers’ Market Revenue Trends Before and After the Implementation of a Monetary Incentive for Recipients of Food Assistance
title_short Comparing Farmers’ Market Revenue Trends Before and After the Implementation of a Monetary Incentive for Recipients of Food Assistance
title_sort comparing farmers’ market revenue trends before and after the implementation of a monetary incentive for recipients of food assistance
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4032058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24854238
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130347
work_keys_str_mv AT freedmandarcya comparingfarmersmarketrevenuetrendsbeforeandaftertheimplementationofamonetaryincentiveforrecipientsoffoodassistance
AT mattisonfayeamy comparingfarmersmarketrevenuetrendsbeforeandaftertheimplementationofamonetaryincentiveforrecipientsoffoodassistance
AT aliakassandra comparingfarmersmarketrevenuetrendsbeforeandaftertheimplementationofamonetaryincentiveforrecipientsoffoodassistance
AT guestmaaron comparingfarmersmarketrevenuetrendsbeforeandaftertheimplementationofamonetaryincentiveforrecipientsoffoodassistance
AT hebertjamesr comparingfarmersmarketrevenuetrendsbeforeandaftertheimplementationofamonetaryincentiveforrecipientsoffoodassistance