Cargando…

Density of the midpalatal suture after RME treatment – a retrospective comparative low-dose CT-study

INTRODUCTION: Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is a common technique to improve the dental and skeletal transverse width in cases of constricted maxillary arches. Although retention after RME has been widely examined, there is still no clear statement about the minimal retention time in postpubertal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schauseil, Michael, Ludwig, Björn, Zorkun, Berna, Hellak, Andreas, Korbmacher-Steiner, Heike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4032485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-18
_version_ 1782317650854019072
author Schauseil, Michael
Ludwig, Björn
Zorkun, Berna
Hellak, Andreas
Korbmacher-Steiner, Heike
author_facet Schauseil, Michael
Ludwig, Björn
Zorkun, Berna
Hellak, Andreas
Korbmacher-Steiner, Heike
author_sort Schauseil, Michael
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is a common technique to improve the dental and skeletal transverse width in cases of constricted maxillary arches. Although retention after RME has been widely examined, there is still no clear statement about the minimal retention time in postpubertal patients and many practitioners have retention concepts varying between three and six months. METHODS: This retrospective study consisted of 14 patients who were either treated with a Haas-type RME (6 patients) or a Hybrid-RME (8 patients). The average age was 15.8 years (min. 13.5 years, max. 23.0 years). Low-dose CT scans were taken initially before placement of the RME (T0), directly after maximal activation (T1) and (in six cases) also in retention after 6 months (T2). Using a 3D-software (“OnDemand3D”/Cybermed Inc.) in analogy to the method published by Franchi et al. (AJODO Volume 137/ Number 4) all values were measured twice at an interval of 1 month to assess the method error and the intraoperator reliability. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 21 for Mac. Possible influences of the RME-type were assessed using the univariate ANOVA. Changes in the sutural density between the different points of time were examined using paired t-tests. RESULTS: The density of the suture decreased significantly after expansion (T0-T1) with both types of RME (p = 0.000). In the retention period there was a significant increase of the sutural density (p = 0.007) although it did not achieve the initial level (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: 1. The midpalatal suture was opened in all analysed patients. 2. In postpubertal patients a retention time of six months does not allow sufficient reorganization of the suture. 3. Therefore, a retention period longer than six months seems to be beneficial to prevent relapses in postpubertal patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4032485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40324852014-05-25 Density of the midpalatal suture after RME treatment – a retrospective comparative low-dose CT-study Schauseil, Michael Ludwig, Björn Zorkun, Berna Hellak, Andreas Korbmacher-Steiner, Heike Head Face Med Research INTRODUCTION: Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is a common technique to improve the dental and skeletal transverse width in cases of constricted maxillary arches. Although retention after RME has been widely examined, there is still no clear statement about the minimal retention time in postpubertal patients and many practitioners have retention concepts varying between three and six months. METHODS: This retrospective study consisted of 14 patients who were either treated with a Haas-type RME (6 patients) or a Hybrid-RME (8 patients). The average age was 15.8 years (min. 13.5 years, max. 23.0 years). Low-dose CT scans were taken initially before placement of the RME (T0), directly after maximal activation (T1) and (in six cases) also in retention after 6 months (T2). Using a 3D-software (“OnDemand3D”/Cybermed Inc.) in analogy to the method published by Franchi et al. (AJODO Volume 137/ Number 4) all values were measured twice at an interval of 1 month to assess the method error and the intraoperator reliability. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 21 for Mac. Possible influences of the RME-type were assessed using the univariate ANOVA. Changes in the sutural density between the different points of time were examined using paired t-tests. RESULTS: The density of the suture decreased significantly after expansion (T0-T1) with both types of RME (p = 0.000). In the retention period there was a significant increase of the sutural density (p = 0.007) although it did not achieve the initial level (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: 1. The midpalatal suture was opened in all analysed patients. 2. In postpubertal patients a retention time of six months does not allow sufficient reorganization of the suture. 3. Therefore, a retention period longer than six months seems to be beneficial to prevent relapses in postpubertal patients. BioMed Central 2014-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4032485/ /pubmed/24884771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-18 Text en Copyright © 2014 Schauseil et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Schauseil, Michael
Ludwig, Björn
Zorkun, Berna
Hellak, Andreas
Korbmacher-Steiner, Heike
Density of the midpalatal suture after RME treatment – a retrospective comparative low-dose CT-study
title Density of the midpalatal suture after RME treatment – a retrospective comparative low-dose CT-study
title_full Density of the midpalatal suture after RME treatment – a retrospective comparative low-dose CT-study
title_fullStr Density of the midpalatal suture after RME treatment – a retrospective comparative low-dose CT-study
title_full_unstemmed Density of the midpalatal suture after RME treatment – a retrospective comparative low-dose CT-study
title_short Density of the midpalatal suture after RME treatment – a retrospective comparative low-dose CT-study
title_sort density of the midpalatal suture after rme treatment – a retrospective comparative low-dose ct-study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4032485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24884771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-18
work_keys_str_mv AT schauseilmichael densityofthemidpalatalsutureafterrmetreatmentaretrospectivecomparativelowdosectstudy
AT ludwigbjorn densityofthemidpalatalsutureafterrmetreatmentaretrospectivecomparativelowdosectstudy
AT zorkunberna densityofthemidpalatalsutureafterrmetreatmentaretrospectivecomparativelowdosectstudy
AT hellakandreas densityofthemidpalatalsutureafterrmetreatmentaretrospectivecomparativelowdosectstudy
AT korbmachersteinerheike densityofthemidpalatalsutureafterrmetreatmentaretrospectivecomparativelowdosectstudy