Cargando…

Differing response properties of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials evoked by air-conducted stimulation

OBJECTIVE: To determine the amplitude changes of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) recorded simultaneously from the neck (cVEMPs) and eyes (oVEMPs) in response to 500 Hz, 2 ms air-conducted sound pips over a 30 dB range. METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers (mean age 29, range 18–57 years...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dennis, Danielle L., Govender, Sendhil, Chen, Peggy, Todd, Neil P. McAngus, Colebatch, James G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4032573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24290850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.11.001
_version_ 1782317660635136000
author Dennis, Danielle L.
Govender, Sendhil
Chen, Peggy
Todd, Neil P. McAngus
Colebatch, James G.
author_facet Dennis, Danielle L.
Govender, Sendhil
Chen, Peggy
Todd, Neil P. McAngus
Colebatch, James G.
author_sort Dennis, Danielle L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the amplitude changes of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) recorded simultaneously from the neck (cVEMPs) and eyes (oVEMPs) in response to 500 Hz, 2 ms air-conducted sound pips over a 30 dB range. METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers (mean age 29, range 18–57 years old) and one patient with unilateral superior canal dehiscence (SCD) were studied. The stimulus was reduced in increments to 105 dB pSPL for the normals (81 dB pSPL for the SCD patient). A statistical criterion was used to detect responses. RESULTS: Ipsilateral (i-p13/n23) and contralateral (c-n12/p24/n30) peaks for the cVEMP montage and contralateral (c-n10/p16/n21) and ipsilateral (i-n13) peaks for the oVEMP montage were present for the baseline intensity. For the lowest intensity, 6/15 subjects had responses for the i-p13 cVEMP potential and 4/15 had c-n10 oVEMP responses. The SCD patient showed larger responses for nearly all intensities. The cVEMP potentials were generally well fitted by a power law relationship, but the oVEMP c-n10, p16 and n21 potentials showed a significant increase in gradient for the higher intensities. CONCLUSION: Most oVEMP and cVEMP responses follow a power law relationship but crossed oVEMP responses showed a change in gradient above a threshold. SIGNIFICANCE: The pattern of response to AC stimulation may be a property of the pathways underlying the potentials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4032573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40325732014-06-01 Differing response properties of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials evoked by air-conducted stimulation Dennis, Danielle L. Govender, Sendhil Chen, Peggy Todd, Neil P. McAngus Colebatch, James G. Clin Neurophysiol Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the amplitude changes of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) recorded simultaneously from the neck (cVEMPs) and eyes (oVEMPs) in response to 500 Hz, 2 ms air-conducted sound pips over a 30 dB range. METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers (mean age 29, range 18–57 years old) and one patient with unilateral superior canal dehiscence (SCD) were studied. The stimulus was reduced in increments to 105 dB pSPL for the normals (81 dB pSPL for the SCD patient). A statistical criterion was used to detect responses. RESULTS: Ipsilateral (i-p13/n23) and contralateral (c-n12/p24/n30) peaks for the cVEMP montage and contralateral (c-n10/p16/n21) and ipsilateral (i-n13) peaks for the oVEMP montage were present for the baseline intensity. For the lowest intensity, 6/15 subjects had responses for the i-p13 cVEMP potential and 4/15 had c-n10 oVEMP responses. The SCD patient showed larger responses for nearly all intensities. The cVEMP potentials were generally well fitted by a power law relationship, but the oVEMP c-n10, p16 and n21 potentials showed a significant increase in gradient for the higher intensities. CONCLUSION: Most oVEMP and cVEMP responses follow a power law relationship but crossed oVEMP responses showed a change in gradient above a threshold. SIGNIFICANCE: The pattern of response to AC stimulation may be a property of the pathways underlying the potentials. Elsevier 2014-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4032573/ /pubmed/24290850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.11.001 Text en © 2013 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Article
Dennis, Danielle L.
Govender, Sendhil
Chen, Peggy
Todd, Neil P. McAngus
Colebatch, James G.
Differing response properties of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials evoked by air-conducted stimulation
title Differing response properties of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials evoked by air-conducted stimulation
title_full Differing response properties of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials evoked by air-conducted stimulation
title_fullStr Differing response properties of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials evoked by air-conducted stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Differing response properties of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials evoked by air-conducted stimulation
title_short Differing response properties of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials evoked by air-conducted stimulation
title_sort differing response properties of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials evoked by air-conducted stimulation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4032573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24290850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.11.001
work_keys_str_mv AT dennisdaniellel differingresponsepropertiesofcervicalandocularvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialsevokedbyairconductedstimulation
AT govendersendhil differingresponsepropertiesofcervicalandocularvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialsevokedbyairconductedstimulation
AT chenpeggy differingresponsepropertiesofcervicalandocularvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialsevokedbyairconductedstimulation
AT toddneilpmcangus differingresponsepropertiesofcervicalandocularvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialsevokedbyairconductedstimulation
AT colebatchjamesg differingresponsepropertiesofcervicalandocularvestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialsevokedbyairconductedstimulation