Cargando…

Impact of changed management policies on operating room efficiency

BACKGROUND: To increase operating room (OR) efficiency, a new resource allocation strategy, a new policy for patient urgency classification, and a new system for OR booking was implemented at a tertiary referral hospital. We investigated the impact of these interventions. METHODS: We carried out a b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandbaek, Birgithe E, Helgheim, Berit I, Larsen, Odd I, Fasting, Sigurd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4032582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-224
_version_ 1782317662555078656
author Sandbaek, Birgithe E
Helgheim, Berit I
Larsen, Odd I
Fasting, Sigurd
author_facet Sandbaek, Birgithe E
Helgheim, Berit I
Larsen, Odd I
Fasting, Sigurd
author_sort Sandbaek, Birgithe E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To increase operating room (OR) efficiency, a new resource allocation strategy, a new policy for patient urgency classification, and a new system for OR booking was implemented at a tertiary referral hospital. We investigated the impact of these interventions. METHODS: We carried out a before-and-after study using OR data. A total of 23 515 elective (planned) and non-elective (unplanned) orthopaedic and general surgeries were conducted during calendar year 2007 (period 1) and July 2008 to July 2009 (period 2). The Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test was used to calculate statistical significance. RESULTS: An increased amount of case time (7.1%, p < 0.05) was conducted without any increase in out-of-hours case time. Despite having three fewer ORs for electives, slightly more elective case time was handled with 26% less use of overtime (p < 0.05). Mean OR utilization was 56% for the 17 mixed ORs, 60% for the 14 elective ORs, and 62% for the 3 dedicated ORs. A 20% growth (p < 0.05) of non-elective case time was primarily absorbed through enhanced daytime surgery, which increased over 48% (p < 0.05). As a result, the proportions of case time on evenings and nights decreased. Specifically, case time at night decreased by 26% (p < 0.05), and the number of nights without surgery increased from 55 to 112 (out of 315 and 316, respectively). Median waiting time for the middle urgencies increased with 1.2 hours, but over 90% received treatment within maximum acceptable waiting time (MAWT) in both periods. Median waiting time for the lowest urgencies was reduced with 12 hours, and the proportion of cases treated within MAWT increased from 70% to 89%. The proportion of high urgency patients (as a proportion of the total) was reduced from 20% to 12%. Consequently, almost 90% of the operations could be planned at least 24 hours in advance. CONCLUSIONS: The redesign facilitated effective daytime surgery and a more selective use of the ORs for high urgency patients out of hours. The synergistic effect probably exceeded the sum of the individual effects of the changes, because the effects of each intervention facilitated the successful implementation of others.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4032582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40325822014-05-25 Impact of changed management policies on operating room efficiency Sandbaek, Birgithe E Helgheim, Berit I Larsen, Odd I Fasting, Sigurd BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: To increase operating room (OR) efficiency, a new resource allocation strategy, a new policy for patient urgency classification, and a new system for OR booking was implemented at a tertiary referral hospital. We investigated the impact of these interventions. METHODS: We carried out a before-and-after study using OR data. A total of 23 515 elective (planned) and non-elective (unplanned) orthopaedic and general surgeries were conducted during calendar year 2007 (period 1) and July 2008 to July 2009 (period 2). The Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test was used to calculate statistical significance. RESULTS: An increased amount of case time (7.1%, p < 0.05) was conducted without any increase in out-of-hours case time. Despite having three fewer ORs for electives, slightly more elective case time was handled with 26% less use of overtime (p < 0.05). Mean OR utilization was 56% for the 17 mixed ORs, 60% for the 14 elective ORs, and 62% for the 3 dedicated ORs. A 20% growth (p < 0.05) of non-elective case time was primarily absorbed through enhanced daytime surgery, which increased over 48% (p < 0.05). As a result, the proportions of case time on evenings and nights decreased. Specifically, case time at night decreased by 26% (p < 0.05), and the number of nights without surgery increased from 55 to 112 (out of 315 and 316, respectively). Median waiting time for the middle urgencies increased with 1.2 hours, but over 90% received treatment within maximum acceptable waiting time (MAWT) in both periods. Median waiting time for the lowest urgencies was reduced with 12 hours, and the proportion of cases treated within MAWT increased from 70% to 89%. The proportion of high urgency patients (as a proportion of the total) was reduced from 20% to 12%. Consequently, almost 90% of the operations could be planned at least 24 hours in advance. CONCLUSIONS: The redesign facilitated effective daytime surgery and a more selective use of the ORs for high urgency patients out of hours. The synergistic effect probably exceeded the sum of the individual effects of the changes, because the effects of each intervention facilitated the successful implementation of others. BioMed Central 2014-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4032582/ /pubmed/24885869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-224 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sandbaek et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sandbaek, Birgithe E
Helgheim, Berit I
Larsen, Odd I
Fasting, Sigurd
Impact of changed management policies on operating room efficiency
title Impact of changed management policies on operating room efficiency
title_full Impact of changed management policies on operating room efficiency
title_fullStr Impact of changed management policies on operating room efficiency
title_full_unstemmed Impact of changed management policies on operating room efficiency
title_short Impact of changed management policies on operating room efficiency
title_sort impact of changed management policies on operating room efficiency
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4032582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24885869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-224
work_keys_str_mv AT sandbaekbirgithee impactofchangedmanagementpoliciesonoperatingroomefficiency
AT helgheimberiti impactofchangedmanagementpoliciesonoperatingroomefficiency
AT larsenoddi impactofchangedmanagementpoliciesonoperatingroomefficiency
AT fastingsigurd impactofchangedmanagementpoliciesonoperatingroomefficiency