Cargando…

How is the McGurk effect modulated by Cued Speech in deaf and hearing adults?

Speech perception for both hearing and deaf people involves an integrative process between auditory and lip-reading information. In order to disambiguate information from lips, manual cues from Cued Speech may be added. Cued Speech (CS) is a system of manual aids developed to help deaf people to cle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bayard, Clémence, Colin, Cécile, Leybaert, Jacqueline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4032946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904451
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00416
_version_ 1782317729337835520
author Bayard, Clémence
Colin, Cécile
Leybaert, Jacqueline
author_facet Bayard, Clémence
Colin, Cécile
Leybaert, Jacqueline
author_sort Bayard, Clémence
collection PubMed
description Speech perception for both hearing and deaf people involves an integrative process between auditory and lip-reading information. In order to disambiguate information from lips, manual cues from Cued Speech may be added. Cued Speech (CS) is a system of manual aids developed to help deaf people to clearly and completely understand speech visually (Cornett, 1967). Within this system, both labial and manual information, as lone input sources, remain ambiguous. Perceivers, therefore, have to combine both types of information in order to get one coherent percept. In this study, we examined how audio-visual (AV) integration is affected by the presence of manual cues and on which form of information (auditory, labial or manual) the CS receptors primarily rely. To address this issue, we designed a unique experiment that implemented the use of AV McGurk stimuli (audio /pa/ and lip-reading /ka/) which were produced with or without manual cues. The manual cue was congruent with either auditory information, lip information or the expected fusion. Participants were asked to repeat the perceived syllable aloud. Their responses were then classified into four categories: audio (when the response was /pa/), lip-reading (when the response was /ka/), fusion (when the response was /ta/) and other (when the response was something other than /pa/, /ka/ or /ta/). Data were collected from hearing impaired individuals who were experts in CS (all of which had either cochlear implants or binaural hearing aids; N = 8), hearing-individuals who were experts in CS (N = 14) and hearing-individuals who were completely naïve of CS (N = 15). Results confirmed that, like hearing-people, deaf people can merge auditory and lip-reading information into a single unified percept. Without manual cues, McGurk stimuli induced the same percentage of fusion responses in both groups. Results also suggest that manual cues can modify the AV integration and that their impact differs between hearing and deaf people.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4032946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40329462014-06-05 How is the McGurk effect modulated by Cued Speech in deaf and hearing adults? Bayard, Clémence Colin, Cécile Leybaert, Jacqueline Front Psychol Psychology Speech perception for both hearing and deaf people involves an integrative process between auditory and lip-reading information. In order to disambiguate information from lips, manual cues from Cued Speech may be added. Cued Speech (CS) is a system of manual aids developed to help deaf people to clearly and completely understand speech visually (Cornett, 1967). Within this system, both labial and manual information, as lone input sources, remain ambiguous. Perceivers, therefore, have to combine both types of information in order to get one coherent percept. In this study, we examined how audio-visual (AV) integration is affected by the presence of manual cues and on which form of information (auditory, labial or manual) the CS receptors primarily rely. To address this issue, we designed a unique experiment that implemented the use of AV McGurk stimuli (audio /pa/ and lip-reading /ka/) which were produced with or without manual cues. The manual cue was congruent with either auditory information, lip information or the expected fusion. Participants were asked to repeat the perceived syllable aloud. Their responses were then classified into four categories: audio (when the response was /pa/), lip-reading (when the response was /ka/), fusion (when the response was /ta/) and other (when the response was something other than /pa/, /ka/ or /ta/). Data were collected from hearing impaired individuals who were experts in CS (all of which had either cochlear implants or binaural hearing aids; N = 8), hearing-individuals who were experts in CS (N = 14) and hearing-individuals who were completely naïve of CS (N = 15). Results confirmed that, like hearing-people, deaf people can merge auditory and lip-reading information into a single unified percept. Without manual cues, McGurk stimuli induced the same percentage of fusion responses in both groups. Results also suggest that manual cues can modify the AV integration and that their impact differs between hearing and deaf people. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4032946/ /pubmed/24904451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00416 Text en Copyright © 2014 Bayard, Colin and Leybaert. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Bayard, Clémence
Colin, Cécile
Leybaert, Jacqueline
How is the McGurk effect modulated by Cued Speech in deaf and hearing adults?
title How is the McGurk effect modulated by Cued Speech in deaf and hearing adults?
title_full How is the McGurk effect modulated by Cued Speech in deaf and hearing adults?
title_fullStr How is the McGurk effect modulated by Cued Speech in deaf and hearing adults?
title_full_unstemmed How is the McGurk effect modulated by Cued Speech in deaf and hearing adults?
title_short How is the McGurk effect modulated by Cued Speech in deaf and hearing adults?
title_sort how is the mcgurk effect modulated by cued speech in deaf and hearing adults?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4032946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904451
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00416
work_keys_str_mv AT bayardclemence howisthemcgurkeffectmodulatedbycuedspeechindeafandhearingadults
AT colincecile howisthemcgurkeffectmodulatedbycuedspeechindeafandhearingadults
AT leybaertjacqueline howisthemcgurkeffectmodulatedbycuedspeechindeafandhearingadults