Cargando…

Motor modules of human locomotion: influence of EMG averaging, concatenation, and number of step cycles

Locomotion can be investigated by factorization of electromyographic (EMG) signals, e.g., with non-negative matrix factorization (NMF). This approach is a convenient concise representation of muscle activities as distributed in motor modules, activated in specific gait phases. For applying NMF, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliveira, Anderson S., Gizzi, Leonardo, Farina, Dario, Kersting, Uwe G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904375
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00335
_version_ 1782317753914359808
author Oliveira, Anderson S.
Gizzi, Leonardo
Farina, Dario
Kersting, Uwe G.
author_facet Oliveira, Anderson S.
Gizzi, Leonardo
Farina, Dario
Kersting, Uwe G.
author_sort Oliveira, Anderson S.
collection PubMed
description Locomotion can be investigated by factorization of electromyographic (EMG) signals, e.g., with non-negative matrix factorization (NMF). This approach is a convenient concise representation of muscle activities as distributed in motor modules, activated in specific gait phases. For applying NMF, the EMG signals are analyzed either as single trials, or as averaged EMG, or as concatenated EMG (data structure). The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of the data structure on the extracted motor modules. Twelve healthy men walked at their preferred speed on a treadmill while surface EMG signals were recorded for 60s from 10 lower limb muscles. Motor modules representing relative weightings of synergistic muscle activations were extracted by NMF from 40 step cycles separately (EMG(SNG)), from averaging 2, 3, 5, 10, 20, and 40 consecutive cycles (EMG(AVR)), and from the concatenation of the same sets of consecutive cycles (EMG(CNC)). Five motor modules were sufficient to reconstruct the original EMG datasets (reconstruction quality >90%), regardless of the type of data structure used. However, EMG(CNC) was associated with a slightly reduced reconstruction quality with respect to EMG(AVR). Most motor modules were similar when extracted from different data structures (similarity >0.85). However, the quality of the reconstructed 40-step EMG(CNC) datasets when using the muscle weightings from EMG(AVR) was low (reconstruction quality ~40%). On the other hand, the use of weightings from EMG(CNC) for reconstructing this long period of locomotion provided higher quality, especially using 20 concatenated steps (reconstruction quality ~80%). Although EMG(SNG) and EMG(AVR) showed a higher reconstruction quality for short signal intervals, these data structures did not account for step-to-step variability. The results of this study provide practical guidelines on the methodological aspects of synergistic muscle activation extraction from EMG during locomotion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4033063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40330632014-06-05 Motor modules of human locomotion: influence of EMG averaging, concatenation, and number of step cycles Oliveira, Anderson S. Gizzi, Leonardo Farina, Dario Kersting, Uwe G. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Locomotion can be investigated by factorization of electromyographic (EMG) signals, e.g., with non-negative matrix factorization (NMF). This approach is a convenient concise representation of muscle activities as distributed in motor modules, activated in specific gait phases. For applying NMF, the EMG signals are analyzed either as single trials, or as averaged EMG, or as concatenated EMG (data structure). The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of the data structure on the extracted motor modules. Twelve healthy men walked at their preferred speed on a treadmill while surface EMG signals were recorded for 60s from 10 lower limb muscles. Motor modules representing relative weightings of synergistic muscle activations were extracted by NMF from 40 step cycles separately (EMG(SNG)), from averaging 2, 3, 5, 10, 20, and 40 consecutive cycles (EMG(AVR)), and from the concatenation of the same sets of consecutive cycles (EMG(CNC)). Five motor modules were sufficient to reconstruct the original EMG datasets (reconstruction quality >90%), regardless of the type of data structure used. However, EMG(CNC) was associated with a slightly reduced reconstruction quality with respect to EMG(AVR). Most motor modules were similar when extracted from different data structures (similarity >0.85). However, the quality of the reconstructed 40-step EMG(CNC) datasets when using the muscle weightings from EMG(AVR) was low (reconstruction quality ~40%). On the other hand, the use of weightings from EMG(CNC) for reconstructing this long period of locomotion provided higher quality, especially using 20 concatenated steps (reconstruction quality ~80%). Although EMG(SNG) and EMG(AVR) showed a higher reconstruction quality for short signal intervals, these data structures did not account for step-to-step variability. The results of this study provide practical guidelines on the methodological aspects of synergistic muscle activation extraction from EMG during locomotion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4033063/ /pubmed/24904375 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00335 Text en Copyright © 2014 Oliveira, Gizzi, Farina and Kersting. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Oliveira, Anderson S.
Gizzi, Leonardo
Farina, Dario
Kersting, Uwe G.
Motor modules of human locomotion: influence of EMG averaging, concatenation, and number of step cycles
title Motor modules of human locomotion: influence of EMG averaging, concatenation, and number of step cycles
title_full Motor modules of human locomotion: influence of EMG averaging, concatenation, and number of step cycles
title_fullStr Motor modules of human locomotion: influence of EMG averaging, concatenation, and number of step cycles
title_full_unstemmed Motor modules of human locomotion: influence of EMG averaging, concatenation, and number of step cycles
title_short Motor modules of human locomotion: influence of EMG averaging, concatenation, and number of step cycles
title_sort motor modules of human locomotion: influence of emg averaging, concatenation, and number of step cycles
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904375
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00335
work_keys_str_mv AT oliveiraandersons motormodulesofhumanlocomotioninfluenceofemgaveragingconcatenationandnumberofstepcycles
AT gizzileonardo motormodulesofhumanlocomotioninfluenceofemgaveragingconcatenationandnumberofstepcycles
AT farinadario motormodulesofhumanlocomotioninfluenceofemgaveragingconcatenationandnumberofstepcycles
AT kerstinguweg motormodulesofhumanlocomotioninfluenceofemgaveragingconcatenationandnumberofstepcycles