Cargando…

Exposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocol

Soccer referees enforce the laws of the game and the decisions they make can directly affect match results. Fixtures within European competitions take place in climatic conditions that are often challenging (e.g., Moscow ~ −5°C, Madrid ~30°C). Effects of these temperatures on player performance are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor, Lee, Fitch, Natalie, Castle, Paul, Watkins, Samuel, Aldous, Jeffrey, Sculthorpe, Nicholas, Midgely, Adrian, Brewer, John, Mauger, Alexis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904425
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00185
_version_ 1782317763111419904
author Taylor, Lee
Fitch, Natalie
Castle, Paul
Watkins, Samuel
Aldous, Jeffrey
Sculthorpe, Nicholas
Midgely, Adrian
Brewer, John
Mauger, Alexis
author_facet Taylor, Lee
Fitch, Natalie
Castle, Paul
Watkins, Samuel
Aldous, Jeffrey
Sculthorpe, Nicholas
Midgely, Adrian
Brewer, John
Mauger, Alexis
author_sort Taylor, Lee
collection PubMed
description Soccer referees enforce the laws of the game and the decisions they make can directly affect match results. Fixtures within European competitions take place in climatic conditions that are often challenging (e.g., Moscow ~ −5°C, Madrid ~30°C). Effects of these temperatures on player performance are well-documented; however, little is known how this environmental stress may impair cognitive performance of soccer referees and if so, whether exercise exasperates this. The present study aims to investigate the effect of cold [COLD; −5°C, 40% relative humidity (RH)], hot (HOT; 30°C, 40% RH) and temperate (CONT; 18°C, 40% RH) conditions on decision making during soccer specific exercise. On separate occasions within each condition, 13 physically active males; either semi-professional referees or semi-professional soccer players completed three 90 min intermittent treadmill protocols that simulated match play, interspersed with 4 computer delivered cognitive tests to measure vigilance and dual task capacity. Core and skin temperature, heart rate, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and thermal sensation (TS) were recorded throughout the protocol. There was no significant difference between conditions for decision making in either the dual task (interaction effects: FALSE p = 0.46; MISSED p = 0.72; TRACKING p = 0.22) or vigilance assessments (interaction effects: FALSE p = 0.31; HIT p = 0.15; MISSED p = 0.17) despite significant differences in measured physiological variables (skin temperature: HOT vs. CONT 95% CI = 2.6 to 3.9, p < 0.001; HOT vs. COLD 95% CI = 6.6 to 9.0, p < 0.001; CONT vs. COLD 95% CI = 3.4 to 5.7, p < 0.01). It is hypothesized that the lack of difference observed in decision making ability between conditions was due to the exercise protocol used, as it may not have elicited an appropriate and valid soccer specific internal load to alter cognitive functioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4033104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40331042014-06-05 Exposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocol Taylor, Lee Fitch, Natalie Castle, Paul Watkins, Samuel Aldous, Jeffrey Sculthorpe, Nicholas Midgely, Adrian Brewer, John Mauger, Alexis Front Physiol Physiology Soccer referees enforce the laws of the game and the decisions they make can directly affect match results. Fixtures within European competitions take place in climatic conditions that are often challenging (e.g., Moscow ~ −5°C, Madrid ~30°C). Effects of these temperatures on player performance are well-documented; however, little is known how this environmental stress may impair cognitive performance of soccer referees and if so, whether exercise exasperates this. The present study aims to investigate the effect of cold [COLD; −5°C, 40% relative humidity (RH)], hot (HOT; 30°C, 40% RH) and temperate (CONT; 18°C, 40% RH) conditions on decision making during soccer specific exercise. On separate occasions within each condition, 13 physically active males; either semi-professional referees or semi-professional soccer players completed three 90 min intermittent treadmill protocols that simulated match play, interspersed with 4 computer delivered cognitive tests to measure vigilance and dual task capacity. Core and skin temperature, heart rate, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and thermal sensation (TS) were recorded throughout the protocol. There was no significant difference between conditions for decision making in either the dual task (interaction effects: FALSE p = 0.46; MISSED p = 0.72; TRACKING p = 0.22) or vigilance assessments (interaction effects: FALSE p = 0.31; HIT p = 0.15; MISSED p = 0.17) despite significant differences in measured physiological variables (skin temperature: HOT vs. CONT 95% CI = 2.6 to 3.9, p < 0.001; HOT vs. COLD 95% CI = 6.6 to 9.0, p < 0.001; CONT vs. COLD 95% CI = 3.4 to 5.7, p < 0.01). It is hypothesized that the lack of difference observed in decision making ability between conditions was due to the exercise protocol used, as it may not have elicited an appropriate and valid soccer specific internal load to alter cognitive functioning. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4033104/ /pubmed/24904425 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00185 Text en Copyright © 2014 Taylor, Fitch, Castle, Watkins, Aldous, Sculthorpe, Midgely, Brewer and Mauger. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Taylor, Lee
Fitch, Natalie
Castle, Paul
Watkins, Samuel
Aldous, Jeffrey
Sculthorpe, Nicholas
Midgely, Adrian
Brewer, John
Mauger, Alexis
Exposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocol
title Exposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocol
title_full Exposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocol
title_fullStr Exposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocol
title_full_unstemmed Exposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocol
title_short Exposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocol
title_sort exposure to hot and cold environmental conditions does not affect the decision making ability of soccer referees following an intermittent sprint protocol
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904425
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00185
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorlee exposuretohotandcoldenvironmentalconditionsdoesnotaffectthedecisionmakingabilityofsoccerrefereesfollowinganintermittentsprintprotocol
AT fitchnatalie exposuretohotandcoldenvironmentalconditionsdoesnotaffectthedecisionmakingabilityofsoccerrefereesfollowinganintermittentsprintprotocol
AT castlepaul exposuretohotandcoldenvironmentalconditionsdoesnotaffectthedecisionmakingabilityofsoccerrefereesfollowinganintermittentsprintprotocol
AT watkinssamuel exposuretohotandcoldenvironmentalconditionsdoesnotaffectthedecisionmakingabilityofsoccerrefereesfollowinganintermittentsprintprotocol
AT aldousjeffrey exposuretohotandcoldenvironmentalconditionsdoesnotaffectthedecisionmakingabilityofsoccerrefereesfollowinganintermittentsprintprotocol
AT sculthorpenicholas exposuretohotandcoldenvironmentalconditionsdoesnotaffectthedecisionmakingabilityofsoccerrefereesfollowinganintermittentsprintprotocol
AT midgelyadrian exposuretohotandcoldenvironmentalconditionsdoesnotaffectthedecisionmakingabilityofsoccerrefereesfollowinganintermittentsprintprotocol
AT brewerjohn exposuretohotandcoldenvironmentalconditionsdoesnotaffectthedecisionmakingabilityofsoccerrefereesfollowinganintermittentsprintprotocol
AT maugeralexis exposuretohotandcoldenvironmentalconditionsdoesnotaffectthedecisionmakingabilityofsoccerrefereesfollowinganintermittentsprintprotocol