Cargando…

The sexual health of female sex workers compared with other women in England: analysis of cross-sectional data from genitourinary medicine clinics

BACKGROUND: While female sex workers (FSWs) are assumed to be at increased risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), there are limited comparative data with other population groups available. Using routine STI surveillance data, we investigated differences in sexual health between FSWs and oth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mc Grath-Lone, Louise, Marsh, Kimberly, Hughes, Gwenda, Ward, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24493858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2013-051381
_version_ 1782317765707694080
author Mc Grath-Lone, Louise
Marsh, Kimberly
Hughes, Gwenda
Ward, Helen
author_facet Mc Grath-Lone, Louise
Marsh, Kimberly
Hughes, Gwenda
Ward, Helen
author_sort Mc Grath-Lone, Louise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While female sex workers (FSWs) are assumed to be at increased risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), there are limited comparative data with other population groups available. Using routine STI surveillance data, we investigated differences in sexual health between FSWs and other female attendees at genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics in England. METHODS: Demographic characteristics, STI prevalence and service usage among FSWs and other attendees in 2011 were compared using logistic regression. RESULTS: In 2011, 2704 FSWs made 8411 recorded visits to 131/208 GUM clinics, (primarily large, FSW-specialist centres in London). FSWs used a variety of services, however, 10% did not have an STI/HIV test at presentation. By comparison with other female attendees, FSWs travelled further for their care and had increased risk of certain STIs (eg, gonorrhoea OR(adj): 2.76, 95% CI 2.16 to 3.54, p<0.001). Migrant FSWs had better sexual health outcomes than UK-born FSWs (eg, period prevalence of chlamydia among those tested: 8.5% vs 13.5%, p<0.001) but were more likely to experience non-STI outcomes (eg, pelvic inflammatory disease OR(adj): 2.92, 95% CI 1.57 to 5.41, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FSWs in England have access to high-quality care through the GUM clinic network, but there is evidence of geographical inequality in access to these services. A minority do not appear to access STI/HIV testing through clinics, and some STIs are more prevalent among FSWs than other female attendees. Targeted interventions aimed at improving uptake of testing in FSWs should be developed, and need to be culturally sensitive to the needs of this predominantly migrant population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4033115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40331152014-06-05 The sexual health of female sex workers compared with other women in England: analysis of cross-sectional data from genitourinary medicine clinics Mc Grath-Lone, Louise Marsh, Kimberly Hughes, Gwenda Ward, Helen Sex Transm Infect Epidemiology BACKGROUND: While female sex workers (FSWs) are assumed to be at increased risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), there are limited comparative data with other population groups available. Using routine STI surveillance data, we investigated differences in sexual health between FSWs and other female attendees at genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics in England. METHODS: Demographic characteristics, STI prevalence and service usage among FSWs and other attendees in 2011 were compared using logistic regression. RESULTS: In 2011, 2704 FSWs made 8411 recorded visits to 131/208 GUM clinics, (primarily large, FSW-specialist centres in London). FSWs used a variety of services, however, 10% did not have an STI/HIV test at presentation. By comparison with other female attendees, FSWs travelled further for their care and had increased risk of certain STIs (eg, gonorrhoea OR(adj): 2.76, 95% CI 2.16 to 3.54, p<0.001). Migrant FSWs had better sexual health outcomes than UK-born FSWs (eg, period prevalence of chlamydia among those tested: 8.5% vs 13.5%, p<0.001) but were more likely to experience non-STI outcomes (eg, pelvic inflammatory disease OR(adj): 2.92, 95% CI 1.57 to 5.41, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FSWs in England have access to high-quality care through the GUM clinic network, but there is evidence of geographical inequality in access to these services. A minority do not appear to access STI/HIV testing through clinics, and some STIs are more prevalent among FSWs than other female attendees. Targeted interventions aimed at improving uptake of testing in FSWs should be developed, and need to be culturally sensitive to the needs of this predominantly migrant population. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-06 2014-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4033115/ /pubmed/24493858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2013-051381 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Mc Grath-Lone, Louise
Marsh, Kimberly
Hughes, Gwenda
Ward, Helen
The sexual health of female sex workers compared with other women in England: analysis of cross-sectional data from genitourinary medicine clinics
title The sexual health of female sex workers compared with other women in England: analysis of cross-sectional data from genitourinary medicine clinics
title_full The sexual health of female sex workers compared with other women in England: analysis of cross-sectional data from genitourinary medicine clinics
title_fullStr The sexual health of female sex workers compared with other women in England: analysis of cross-sectional data from genitourinary medicine clinics
title_full_unstemmed The sexual health of female sex workers compared with other women in England: analysis of cross-sectional data from genitourinary medicine clinics
title_short The sexual health of female sex workers compared with other women in England: analysis of cross-sectional data from genitourinary medicine clinics
title_sort sexual health of female sex workers compared with other women in england: analysis of cross-sectional data from genitourinary medicine clinics
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24493858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2013-051381
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgrathlonelouise thesexualhealthoffemalesexworkerscomparedwithotherwomeninenglandanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafromgenitourinarymedicineclinics
AT marshkimberly thesexualhealthoffemalesexworkerscomparedwithotherwomeninenglandanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafromgenitourinarymedicineclinics
AT hughesgwenda thesexualhealthoffemalesexworkerscomparedwithotherwomeninenglandanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafromgenitourinarymedicineclinics
AT wardhelen thesexualhealthoffemalesexworkerscomparedwithotherwomeninenglandanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafromgenitourinarymedicineclinics
AT mcgrathlonelouise sexualhealthoffemalesexworkerscomparedwithotherwomeninenglandanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafromgenitourinarymedicineclinics
AT marshkimberly sexualhealthoffemalesexworkerscomparedwithotherwomeninenglandanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafromgenitourinarymedicineclinics
AT hughesgwenda sexualhealthoffemalesexworkerscomparedwithotherwomeninenglandanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafromgenitourinarymedicineclinics
AT wardhelen sexualhealthoffemalesexworkerscomparedwithotherwomeninenglandanalysisofcrosssectionaldatafromgenitourinarymedicineclinics