Cargando…

Genome-wide profiling is a clinically relevant and affordable prognostic test in posterior uveal melanoma

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the capacity of genetic analysis of uveal melanoma samples to identify high-risk patients and discusses its clinical implications. METHODS: Patients with posterior uveal melanoma were prospectively enrolled. Tumour samples were derived from enucleated globe, fine-n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cassoux, Nathalie, Rodrigues, Manuel Jorge, Plancher, Corine, Asselain, Bernard, Levy-Gabriel, Christine, Lumbroso-Le Rouic, Livia, Piperno-Neumann, Sophie, Dendale, Rémi, Sastre, Xavier, Desjardins, Laurence, Couturier, Jérôme
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24169649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303867
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the capacity of genetic analysis of uveal melanoma samples to identify high-risk patients and discusses its clinical implications. METHODS: Patients with posterior uveal melanoma were prospectively enrolled. Tumour samples were derived from enucleated globe, fine-needle aspirates or endoresection. Chromosome 3 and 8 status was determined by array comparative genomic hybridisation (array-CGH). Patients were followed after treatment to detect metastasis. RESULTS: Four groups were classified by array-CGH. Patients were divided into disomy 3 and normal chromosome 8 (D3/8nl), disomy 3 and 8q gain (D3/8g), monosomy 3 and normal chromosome 8 (M3/8nl) and monosomy 3 and 8 or 8q gain (M3/8g). Median follow-up was 28 months (range: 1–147 months). At the end of the study, 128 patients (33.7%) had developed metastasis and 96 patients had died. Univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that factors associated with metastasis included basal tumour diameter p=0.0007, tumour thickness p=0.01, mixed/epithelioid cell type p=0.0009 and genomic data p<0.0001. High-risk profile was more strongly associated with metastasis than the other prognostic factors p<0.001. Multivariate Cox modelling analysis showed that the status of chromosomes 3 and 8 were the only two variables that independently contributed to prognosis: monosomy 3 alone p=0.001 and monosomy 3 and 8q gain p<0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: Array-CGH allowed identification of three prognostic groups with low, intermediate and high risk of developing metastasis. Array-CGH is a reliable and inexpensive method for uveal melanoma prognosis. This method is now currently used in France.