Cargando…
Robot-assisted vs. sensory integration training in treating gait and balance dysfunctions in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial
Background: Extensive research on both healthy subjects and patients with central nervous damage has elucidated a crucial role of postural adjustment reactions and central sensory integration processes in generating and “shaping” locomotor function, respectively. Whether robotic-assisted gait device...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00318 |
_version_ | 1782317791709233152 |
---|---|
author | Gandolfi, Marialuisa Geroin, Christian Picelli, Alessandro Munari, Daniele Waldner, Andreas Tamburin, Stefano Marchioretto, Fabio Smania, Nicola |
author_facet | Gandolfi, Marialuisa Geroin, Christian Picelli, Alessandro Munari, Daniele Waldner, Andreas Tamburin, Stefano Marchioretto, Fabio Smania, Nicola |
author_sort | Gandolfi, Marialuisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Extensive research on both healthy subjects and patients with central nervous damage has elucidated a crucial role of postural adjustment reactions and central sensory integration processes in generating and “shaping” locomotor function, respectively. Whether robotic-assisted gait devices might improve these functions in Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients is not fully investigated in literature. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of end-effector robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) and sensory integration balance training (SIBT) in improving walking and balance performance in patients with MS. Methods: Twenty-two patients with MS (EDSS: 1.5–6.5) were randomly assigned to two groups. The RAGT group (n = 12) underwent end-effector system training. The SIBT group (n = 10) underwent specific balance exercises. Each patient received twelve 50-min treatment sessions (2 days/week). A blinded rater evaluated patients before and after treatment as well as 1 month post treatment. Primary outcomes were walking speed and Berg Balance Scale. Secondary outcomes were the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Sensory Organization Balance Test, Stabilometric Assessment, Fatigue Severity Scale, cadence, step length, single and double support time, Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54. Results: Between groups comparisons showed no significant differences on primary and secondary outcome measures over time. Within group comparisons showed significant improvements in both groups on the Berg Balance Scale (P = 0.001). Changes approaching significance were found on gait speed (P = 0.07) only in the RAGT group. Significant changes in balance task-related domains during standing and walking conditions were found in the SIBT group. Conclusion: Balance disorders in patients with MS may be ameliorated by RAGT and by SIBT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4033226 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40332262014-06-05 Robot-assisted vs. sensory integration training in treating gait and balance dysfunctions in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial Gandolfi, Marialuisa Geroin, Christian Picelli, Alessandro Munari, Daniele Waldner, Andreas Tamburin, Stefano Marchioretto, Fabio Smania, Nicola Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Background: Extensive research on both healthy subjects and patients with central nervous damage has elucidated a crucial role of postural adjustment reactions and central sensory integration processes in generating and “shaping” locomotor function, respectively. Whether robotic-assisted gait devices might improve these functions in Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients is not fully investigated in literature. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of end-effector robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) and sensory integration balance training (SIBT) in improving walking and balance performance in patients with MS. Methods: Twenty-two patients with MS (EDSS: 1.5–6.5) were randomly assigned to two groups. The RAGT group (n = 12) underwent end-effector system training. The SIBT group (n = 10) underwent specific balance exercises. Each patient received twelve 50-min treatment sessions (2 days/week). A blinded rater evaluated patients before and after treatment as well as 1 month post treatment. Primary outcomes were walking speed and Berg Balance Scale. Secondary outcomes were the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Sensory Organization Balance Test, Stabilometric Assessment, Fatigue Severity Scale, cadence, step length, single and double support time, Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54. Results: Between groups comparisons showed no significant differences on primary and secondary outcome measures over time. Within group comparisons showed significant improvements in both groups on the Berg Balance Scale (P = 0.001). Changes approaching significance were found on gait speed (P = 0.07) only in the RAGT group. Significant changes in balance task-related domains during standing and walking conditions were found in the SIBT group. Conclusion: Balance disorders in patients with MS may be ameliorated by RAGT and by SIBT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4033226/ /pubmed/24904361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00318 Text en Copyright © 2014 Gandolfi, Geroin, Picelli, Munari, Waldner, Tamburin, Marchioretto and Smania. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Gandolfi, Marialuisa Geroin, Christian Picelli, Alessandro Munari, Daniele Waldner, Andreas Tamburin, Stefano Marchioretto, Fabio Smania, Nicola Robot-assisted vs. sensory integration training in treating gait and balance dysfunctions in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Robot-assisted vs. sensory integration training in treating gait and balance dysfunctions in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Robot-assisted vs. sensory integration training in treating gait and balance dysfunctions in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Robot-assisted vs. sensory integration training in treating gait and balance dysfunctions in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Robot-assisted vs. sensory integration training in treating gait and balance dysfunctions in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Robot-assisted vs. sensory integration training in treating gait and balance dysfunctions in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | robot-assisted vs. sensory integration training in treating gait and balance dysfunctions in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00318 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gandolfimarialuisa robotassistedvssensoryintegrationtrainingintreatinggaitandbalancedysfunctionsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT geroinchristian robotassistedvssensoryintegrationtrainingintreatinggaitandbalancedysfunctionsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT picellialessandro robotassistedvssensoryintegrationtrainingintreatinggaitandbalancedysfunctionsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT munaridaniele robotassistedvssensoryintegrationtrainingintreatinggaitandbalancedysfunctionsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT waldnerandreas robotassistedvssensoryintegrationtrainingintreatinggaitandbalancedysfunctionsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tamburinstefano robotassistedvssensoryintegrationtrainingintreatinggaitandbalancedysfunctionsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT marchiorettofabio robotassistedvssensoryintegrationtrainingintreatinggaitandbalancedysfunctionsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT smanianicola robotassistedvssensoryintegrationtrainingintreatinggaitandbalancedysfunctionsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial |