Cargando…

The specificity of action knowledge in sensory and motor systems

Neuroimaging studies have found that sensorimotor systems are engaged when participants observe actions or comprehend action language. However, most of these studies have asked the binary question of whether action concepts are embodied or not, rather than whether sensory and motor areas of the brai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watson, Christine E., Cardillo, Eileen R., Bromberger, Bianca, Chatterjee, Anjan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00494
_version_ 1782317800804581376
author Watson, Christine E.
Cardillo, Eileen R.
Bromberger, Bianca
Chatterjee, Anjan
author_facet Watson, Christine E.
Cardillo, Eileen R.
Bromberger, Bianca
Chatterjee, Anjan
author_sort Watson, Christine E.
collection PubMed
description Neuroimaging studies have found that sensorimotor systems are engaged when participants observe actions or comprehend action language. However, most of these studies have asked the binary question of whether action concepts are embodied or not, rather than whether sensory and motor areas of the brain contain graded amounts of information during putative action simulations. To address this question, we used repetition suppression (RS) functional magnetic resonance imaging to determine if functionally-localized motor movement and visual motion regions-of-interest (ROI) and two anatomical ROIs (inferior frontal gyrus, IFG; left posterior middle temporal gyrus, pMTG) were sensitive to changes in the exemplar (e.g., two different people “kicking”) or representational format (e.g., photograph or schematic drawing of someone “kicking”) within pairs of action images. We also investigated whether concrete versus more symbolic depictions of actions (i.e., photographs or schematic drawings) yielded different patterns of activation throughout the brain. We found that during a conceptual task, sensory and motor systems represent actions at different levels of specificity. While the visual motion ROI did not exhibit RS to different exemplars of the same action or to the same action depicted by different formats, the motor movement ROI did. These effects are consistent with “person-specific” action simulations: if the motor system is recruited for action understanding, it does so by activating one's own motor program for an action. We also observed significant repetition enhancement within the IFG ROI to different exemplars or formats of the same action, a result that may indicate additional cognitive processing on these trials. Finally, we found that the recruitment of posterior brain regions by action concepts depends on the format of the input: left lateral occipital cortex and right supramarginal gyrus responded more strongly to symbolic depictions of actions than concrete ones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4033265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40332652014-06-05 The specificity of action knowledge in sensory and motor systems Watson, Christine E. Cardillo, Eileen R. Bromberger, Bianca Chatterjee, Anjan Front Psychol Psychology Neuroimaging studies have found that sensorimotor systems are engaged when participants observe actions or comprehend action language. However, most of these studies have asked the binary question of whether action concepts are embodied or not, rather than whether sensory and motor areas of the brain contain graded amounts of information during putative action simulations. To address this question, we used repetition suppression (RS) functional magnetic resonance imaging to determine if functionally-localized motor movement and visual motion regions-of-interest (ROI) and two anatomical ROIs (inferior frontal gyrus, IFG; left posterior middle temporal gyrus, pMTG) were sensitive to changes in the exemplar (e.g., two different people “kicking”) or representational format (e.g., photograph or schematic drawing of someone “kicking”) within pairs of action images. We also investigated whether concrete versus more symbolic depictions of actions (i.e., photographs or schematic drawings) yielded different patterns of activation throughout the brain. We found that during a conceptual task, sensory and motor systems represent actions at different levels of specificity. While the visual motion ROI did not exhibit RS to different exemplars of the same action or to the same action depicted by different formats, the motor movement ROI did. These effects are consistent with “person-specific” action simulations: if the motor system is recruited for action understanding, it does so by activating one's own motor program for an action. We also observed significant repetition enhancement within the IFG ROI to different exemplars or formats of the same action, a result that may indicate additional cognitive processing on these trials. Finally, we found that the recruitment of posterior brain regions by action concepts depends on the format of the input: left lateral occipital cortex and right supramarginal gyrus responded more strongly to symbolic depictions of actions than concrete ones. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4033265/ /pubmed/24904506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00494 Text en Copyright © 2014 Watson, Cardillo, Bromberger and Chatterjee. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Watson, Christine E.
Cardillo, Eileen R.
Bromberger, Bianca
Chatterjee, Anjan
The specificity of action knowledge in sensory and motor systems
title The specificity of action knowledge in sensory and motor systems
title_full The specificity of action knowledge in sensory and motor systems
title_fullStr The specificity of action knowledge in sensory and motor systems
title_full_unstemmed The specificity of action knowledge in sensory and motor systems
title_short The specificity of action knowledge in sensory and motor systems
title_sort specificity of action knowledge in sensory and motor systems
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00494
work_keys_str_mv AT watsonchristinee thespecificityofactionknowledgeinsensoryandmotorsystems
AT cardilloeileenr thespecificityofactionknowledgeinsensoryandmotorsystems
AT brombergerbianca thespecificityofactionknowledgeinsensoryandmotorsystems
AT chatterjeeanjan thespecificityofactionknowledgeinsensoryandmotorsystems
AT watsonchristinee specificityofactionknowledgeinsensoryandmotorsystems
AT cardilloeileenr specificityofactionknowledgeinsensoryandmotorsystems
AT brombergerbianca specificityofactionknowledgeinsensoryandmotorsystems
AT chatterjeeanjan specificityofactionknowledgeinsensoryandmotorsystems