Cargando…
The specificity of action knowledge in sensory and motor systems
Neuroimaging studies have found that sensorimotor systems are engaged when participants observe actions or comprehend action language. However, most of these studies have asked the binary question of whether action concepts are embodied or not, rather than whether sensory and motor areas of the brai...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00494 |
_version_ | 1782317800804581376 |
---|---|
author | Watson, Christine E. Cardillo, Eileen R. Bromberger, Bianca Chatterjee, Anjan |
author_facet | Watson, Christine E. Cardillo, Eileen R. Bromberger, Bianca Chatterjee, Anjan |
author_sort | Watson, Christine E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neuroimaging studies have found that sensorimotor systems are engaged when participants observe actions or comprehend action language. However, most of these studies have asked the binary question of whether action concepts are embodied or not, rather than whether sensory and motor areas of the brain contain graded amounts of information during putative action simulations. To address this question, we used repetition suppression (RS) functional magnetic resonance imaging to determine if functionally-localized motor movement and visual motion regions-of-interest (ROI) and two anatomical ROIs (inferior frontal gyrus, IFG; left posterior middle temporal gyrus, pMTG) were sensitive to changes in the exemplar (e.g., two different people “kicking”) or representational format (e.g., photograph or schematic drawing of someone “kicking”) within pairs of action images. We also investigated whether concrete versus more symbolic depictions of actions (i.e., photographs or schematic drawings) yielded different patterns of activation throughout the brain. We found that during a conceptual task, sensory and motor systems represent actions at different levels of specificity. While the visual motion ROI did not exhibit RS to different exemplars of the same action or to the same action depicted by different formats, the motor movement ROI did. These effects are consistent with “person-specific” action simulations: if the motor system is recruited for action understanding, it does so by activating one's own motor program for an action. We also observed significant repetition enhancement within the IFG ROI to different exemplars or formats of the same action, a result that may indicate additional cognitive processing on these trials. Finally, we found that the recruitment of posterior brain regions by action concepts depends on the format of the input: left lateral occipital cortex and right supramarginal gyrus responded more strongly to symbolic depictions of actions than concrete ones. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4033265 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40332652014-06-05 The specificity of action knowledge in sensory and motor systems Watson, Christine E. Cardillo, Eileen R. Bromberger, Bianca Chatterjee, Anjan Front Psychol Psychology Neuroimaging studies have found that sensorimotor systems are engaged when participants observe actions or comprehend action language. However, most of these studies have asked the binary question of whether action concepts are embodied or not, rather than whether sensory and motor areas of the brain contain graded amounts of information during putative action simulations. To address this question, we used repetition suppression (RS) functional magnetic resonance imaging to determine if functionally-localized motor movement and visual motion regions-of-interest (ROI) and two anatomical ROIs (inferior frontal gyrus, IFG; left posterior middle temporal gyrus, pMTG) were sensitive to changes in the exemplar (e.g., two different people “kicking”) or representational format (e.g., photograph or schematic drawing of someone “kicking”) within pairs of action images. We also investigated whether concrete versus more symbolic depictions of actions (i.e., photographs or schematic drawings) yielded different patterns of activation throughout the brain. We found that during a conceptual task, sensory and motor systems represent actions at different levels of specificity. While the visual motion ROI did not exhibit RS to different exemplars of the same action or to the same action depicted by different formats, the motor movement ROI did. These effects are consistent with “person-specific” action simulations: if the motor system is recruited for action understanding, it does so by activating one's own motor program for an action. We also observed significant repetition enhancement within the IFG ROI to different exemplars or formats of the same action, a result that may indicate additional cognitive processing on these trials. Finally, we found that the recruitment of posterior brain regions by action concepts depends on the format of the input: left lateral occipital cortex and right supramarginal gyrus responded more strongly to symbolic depictions of actions than concrete ones. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4033265/ /pubmed/24904506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00494 Text en Copyright © 2014 Watson, Cardillo, Bromberger and Chatterjee. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Watson, Christine E. Cardillo, Eileen R. Bromberger, Bianca Chatterjee, Anjan The specificity of action knowledge in sensory and motor systems |
title | The specificity of action knowledge in sensory and motor systems |
title_full | The specificity of action knowledge in sensory and motor systems |
title_fullStr | The specificity of action knowledge in sensory and motor systems |
title_full_unstemmed | The specificity of action knowledge in sensory and motor systems |
title_short | The specificity of action knowledge in sensory and motor systems |
title_sort | specificity of action knowledge in sensory and motor systems |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00494 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT watsonchristinee thespecificityofactionknowledgeinsensoryandmotorsystems AT cardilloeileenr thespecificityofactionknowledgeinsensoryandmotorsystems AT brombergerbianca thespecificityofactionknowledgeinsensoryandmotorsystems AT chatterjeeanjan thespecificityofactionknowledgeinsensoryandmotorsystems AT watsonchristinee specificityofactionknowledgeinsensoryandmotorsystems AT cardilloeileenr specificityofactionknowledgeinsensoryandmotorsystems AT brombergerbianca specificityofactionknowledgeinsensoryandmotorsystems AT chatterjeeanjan specificityofactionknowledgeinsensoryandmotorsystems |