Cargando…

Bond Strengths of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites to Various Underlying Materials

Objective. To evaluate shear bond strength (SBS) values of a methacrylate (FZ 250) and a silorane-based (FS) resin composite to various underlying materials. Materials and Methods. A total of 80 samples were prepared with four different underlying materials; a flowable (FLC) and a bulk-fill flowable...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozer, Sezin, Sen Tunc, Emine, Gonulol, Nihan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24895608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/782090
_version_ 1782317827196190720
author Ozer, Sezin
Sen Tunc, Emine
Gonulol, Nihan
author_facet Ozer, Sezin
Sen Tunc, Emine
Gonulol, Nihan
author_sort Ozer, Sezin
collection PubMed
description Objective. To evaluate shear bond strength (SBS) values of a methacrylate (FZ 250) and a silorane-based (FS) resin composite to various underlying materials. Materials and Methods. A total of 80 samples were prepared with four different underlying materials; a flowable (FLC) and a bulk-fill flowable composite (BFC), and a conventional (CGIC) and resin modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC). These underlying materials were laminated plus to methacrylate or silorane-based resin composites (n = 10). To evaluate the specimens SBS values were evaluated with a universal testing machine (cross-head speed; 1.0 mm/min). Statistical comparisons were carried out using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test with a significance level of P < 0.05. Results. SBS values for FZ250 were significantly higher than for FS for all of the underlying materials tested (P < 0.05). SBS values of FZ250 to BFC were significantly higher than to all other materials (P < 0.05), whereas SBS values of FS did not vary significantly according to underlying material (P > 0.05). Conclusion. The use of FS in conjunction with any of the tested materials showed lower SBS than the FZ 250. Also, new low elastic modulus liner BFC presented slightly good interfacial adhesion so, the usage of BFC as an underlying material may be preferable for FZ 250.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4033496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40334962014-06-03 Bond Strengths of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites to Various Underlying Materials Ozer, Sezin Sen Tunc, Emine Gonulol, Nihan Biomed Res Int Research Article Objective. To evaluate shear bond strength (SBS) values of a methacrylate (FZ 250) and a silorane-based (FS) resin composite to various underlying materials. Materials and Methods. A total of 80 samples were prepared with four different underlying materials; a flowable (FLC) and a bulk-fill flowable composite (BFC), and a conventional (CGIC) and resin modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC). These underlying materials were laminated plus to methacrylate or silorane-based resin composites (n = 10). To evaluate the specimens SBS values were evaluated with a universal testing machine (cross-head speed; 1.0 mm/min). Statistical comparisons were carried out using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test with a significance level of P < 0.05. Results. SBS values for FZ250 were significantly higher than for FS for all of the underlying materials tested (P < 0.05). SBS values of FZ250 to BFC were significantly higher than to all other materials (P < 0.05), whereas SBS values of FS did not vary significantly according to underlying material (P > 0.05). Conclusion. The use of FS in conjunction with any of the tested materials showed lower SBS than the FZ 250. Also, new low elastic modulus liner BFC presented slightly good interfacial adhesion so, the usage of BFC as an underlying material may be preferable for FZ 250. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4033496/ /pubmed/24895608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/782090 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sezin Ozer et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ozer, Sezin
Sen Tunc, Emine
Gonulol, Nihan
Bond Strengths of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites to Various Underlying Materials
title Bond Strengths of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites to Various Underlying Materials
title_full Bond Strengths of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites to Various Underlying Materials
title_fullStr Bond Strengths of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites to Various Underlying Materials
title_full_unstemmed Bond Strengths of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites to Various Underlying Materials
title_short Bond Strengths of Silorane- and Methacrylate-Based Composites to Various Underlying Materials
title_sort bond strengths of silorane- and methacrylate-based composites to various underlying materials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24895608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/782090
work_keys_str_mv AT ozersezin bondstrengthsofsiloraneandmethacrylatebasedcompositestovariousunderlyingmaterials
AT sentuncemine bondstrengthsofsiloraneandmethacrylatebasedcompositestovariousunderlyingmaterials
AT gonulolnihan bondstrengthsofsiloraneandmethacrylatebasedcompositestovariousunderlyingmaterials