Cargando…
Bladder Injury During Cesarean Delivery
Cesarean section is the most common surgery performed in the United States with over 30% of deliveries occurring via this route. This number is likely to increase given decreasing rates of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) and primary cesarean delivery on maternal request, which carries th...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Science Publishers
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24876830 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157340480902140102151729 |
_version_ | 1782317838651883520 |
---|---|
author | Tarney, Christopher M. |
author_facet | Tarney, Christopher M. |
author_sort | Tarney, Christopher M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cesarean section is the most common surgery performed in the United States with over 30% of deliveries occurring via this route. This number is likely to increase given decreasing rates of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) and primary cesarean delivery on maternal request, which carries the inherent risk for intraoperative complications. Urologic injury is the most common injury at the time of either obstetric or gynecologic surgery, with the bladder being the most frequent organ damaged. Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean section include previous cesarean delivery, adhesions, emergent cesarean delivery, and cesarean section performed at the time of the second stage of labor. Fortunately, most bladder injuries are recognized at the time of surgery, which is important, as quick recognition and repair are associated with a significant reduction in patient mortality. Although cesarean delivery is a cornerstone of obstetrics, there is a paucity of data in the literature either supporting or refuting specific techniques that are performed today. There is evidence to support double-layer closure of the hysterotomy, the routine use of adhesive barriers, and performing a Pfannenstiel skin incision versus a vertical midline subumbilical incision to decrease the risk for bladder injury during cesarean section. There is also no evidence that supports the creation of a bladder flap, although routinely performed during cesarean section, as a method to reduce the risk of bladder injury. Finally, more research is needed to determine if indwelling catheterization, exteriorization of the uterus, and methods to extend hysterotomy incision lead to bladder injury. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4033551 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Bentham Science Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40335512014-05-27 Bladder Injury During Cesarean Delivery Tarney, Christopher M. Curr Womens Health Rev Article Cesarean section is the most common surgery performed in the United States with over 30% of deliveries occurring via this route. This number is likely to increase given decreasing rates of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) and primary cesarean delivery on maternal request, which carries the inherent risk for intraoperative complications. Urologic injury is the most common injury at the time of either obstetric or gynecologic surgery, with the bladder being the most frequent organ damaged. Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean section include previous cesarean delivery, adhesions, emergent cesarean delivery, and cesarean section performed at the time of the second stage of labor. Fortunately, most bladder injuries are recognized at the time of surgery, which is important, as quick recognition and repair are associated with a significant reduction in patient mortality. Although cesarean delivery is a cornerstone of obstetrics, there is a paucity of data in the literature either supporting or refuting specific techniques that are performed today. There is evidence to support double-layer closure of the hysterotomy, the routine use of adhesive barriers, and performing a Pfannenstiel skin incision versus a vertical midline subumbilical incision to decrease the risk for bladder injury during cesarean section. There is also no evidence that supports the creation of a bladder flap, although routinely performed during cesarean section, as a method to reduce the risk of bladder injury. Finally, more research is needed to determine if indwelling catheterization, exteriorization of the uterus, and methods to extend hysterotomy incision lead to bladder injury. Bentham Science Publishers 2013-05 2013-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4033551/ /pubmed/24876830 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157340480902140102151729 Text en © 2012 Bentham Science Publishers http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/), which permits unrestrictive use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Tarney, Christopher M. Bladder Injury During Cesarean Delivery |
title | Bladder Injury During Cesarean Delivery |
title_full | Bladder Injury During Cesarean Delivery |
title_fullStr | Bladder Injury During Cesarean Delivery |
title_full_unstemmed | Bladder Injury During Cesarean Delivery |
title_short | Bladder Injury During Cesarean Delivery |
title_sort | bladder injury during cesarean delivery |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4033551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24876830 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157340480902140102151729 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tarneychristopherm bladderinjuryduringcesareandelivery |