Cargando…
Can Colonoscopy Aspirates be a Substitute for Fecal Samples in Analyses of the Intestinal Microbiota?
There is a growing interest in the study of the human gut microbiota, as correlations between changes in bacterial profiles and diseases are increasingly discovered. Studies in this field generally use fecal samples, but it is often easier to obtain colon content aspirates during colonoscopy. This s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4034279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24936352 http://dx.doi.org/10.12938/bmfh.31.71 |
_version_ | 1782317940395212800 |
---|---|
author | KEREN, Nirit NAFTALI, Timna KOVACS, Amir KONIKOFF, Fred M. GOPHNA, Uri |
author_facet | KEREN, Nirit NAFTALI, Timna KOVACS, Amir KONIKOFF, Fred M. GOPHNA, Uri |
author_sort | KEREN, Nirit |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a growing interest in the study of the human gut microbiota, as correlations between changes in bacterial profiles and diseases are increasingly discovered. Studies in this field generally use fecal samples, but it is often easier to obtain colon content aspirates during colonoscopy. This study used automated ribosomal internal spacer analysis (ARISA) to examine the extent to which the microbiota of colon aspirate samples obtained after bowel cleansing can reflect interindividual differences and serve as a proxy for fecal samples. Pre-bowel preparation fecal samples as well as colonoscopy aspirate samples from the cecum and rectum were obtained from 19 subjects. DNA was extracted from all samples, and comparative analysis was performed, including analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) and nonmetric multidimensional scaling. ANOSIM confirmed that samples from the same individual were well separated from samples from different individuals. Significantly larger differences were found between samples from different individuals than between samples of the same individual (R = 0.7605, p < 0.0001). These findings show that post-bowel preparation aspirates maintain a strong individual signature. Colonoscopy aspirates can therefore serve as a substitute for fecal samples in studies comparing the microbiota of different clinical study groups, especially when fecal samples are unavailable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4034279 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40342792014-06-16 Can Colonoscopy Aspirates be a Substitute for Fecal Samples in Analyses of the Intestinal Microbiota? KEREN, Nirit NAFTALI, Timna KOVACS, Amir KONIKOFF, Fred M. GOPHNA, Uri Biosci Microbiota Food Health Note There is a growing interest in the study of the human gut microbiota, as correlations between changes in bacterial profiles and diseases are increasingly discovered. Studies in this field generally use fecal samples, but it is often easier to obtain colon content aspirates during colonoscopy. This study used automated ribosomal internal spacer analysis (ARISA) to examine the extent to which the microbiota of colon aspirate samples obtained after bowel cleansing can reflect interindividual differences and serve as a proxy for fecal samples. Pre-bowel preparation fecal samples as well as colonoscopy aspirate samples from the cecum and rectum were obtained from 19 subjects. DNA was extracted from all samples, and comparative analysis was performed, including analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) and nonmetric multidimensional scaling. ANOSIM confirmed that samples from the same individual were well separated from samples from different individuals. Significantly larger differences were found between samples from different individuals than between samples of the same individual (R = 0.7605, p < 0.0001). These findings show that post-bowel preparation aspirates maintain a strong individual signature. Colonoscopy aspirates can therefore serve as a substitute for fecal samples in studies comparing the microbiota of different clinical study groups, especially when fecal samples are unavailable. Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health 2012-07-26 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC4034279/ /pubmed/24936352 http://dx.doi.org/10.12938/bmfh.31.71 Text en Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. |
spellingShingle | Note KEREN, Nirit NAFTALI, Timna KOVACS, Amir KONIKOFF, Fred M. GOPHNA, Uri Can Colonoscopy Aspirates be a Substitute for Fecal Samples in Analyses of the Intestinal Microbiota? |
title | Can Colonoscopy Aspirates be a Substitute for Fecal Samples in Analyses of
the Intestinal Microbiota? |
title_full | Can Colonoscopy Aspirates be a Substitute for Fecal Samples in Analyses of
the Intestinal Microbiota? |
title_fullStr | Can Colonoscopy Aspirates be a Substitute for Fecal Samples in Analyses of
the Intestinal Microbiota? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can Colonoscopy Aspirates be a Substitute for Fecal Samples in Analyses of
the Intestinal Microbiota? |
title_short | Can Colonoscopy Aspirates be a Substitute for Fecal Samples in Analyses of
the Intestinal Microbiota? |
title_sort | can colonoscopy aspirates be a substitute for fecal samples in analyses of
the intestinal microbiota? |
topic | Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4034279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24936352 http://dx.doi.org/10.12938/bmfh.31.71 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kerennirit cancolonoscopyaspiratesbeasubstituteforfecalsamplesinanalysesoftheintestinalmicrobiota AT naftalitimna cancolonoscopyaspiratesbeasubstituteforfecalsamplesinanalysesoftheintestinalmicrobiota AT kovacsamir cancolonoscopyaspiratesbeasubstituteforfecalsamplesinanalysesoftheintestinalmicrobiota AT konikofffredm cancolonoscopyaspiratesbeasubstituteforfecalsamplesinanalysesoftheintestinalmicrobiota AT gophnauri cancolonoscopyaspiratesbeasubstituteforfecalsamplesinanalysesoftheintestinalmicrobiota |