Cargando…

Localization of MEG human brain responses to retinotopic visual stimuli with contrasting source reconstruction approaches

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) allows the physiological recording of human brain activity at high temporal resolution. However, spatial localization of the source of the MEG signal is an ill-posed problem as the signal alone cannot constrain a unique solution and additional prior assumptions must be e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cicmil, Nela, Bridge, Holly, Parker, Andrew J., Woolrich, Mark W., Krug, Kristine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4034416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904268
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00127
_version_ 1782317962291576832
author Cicmil, Nela
Bridge, Holly
Parker, Andrew J.
Woolrich, Mark W.
Krug, Kristine
author_facet Cicmil, Nela
Bridge, Holly
Parker, Andrew J.
Woolrich, Mark W.
Krug, Kristine
author_sort Cicmil, Nela
collection PubMed
description Magnetoencephalography (MEG) allows the physiological recording of human brain activity at high temporal resolution. However, spatial localization of the source of the MEG signal is an ill-posed problem as the signal alone cannot constrain a unique solution and additional prior assumptions must be enforced. An adequate source reconstruction method for investigating the human visual system should place the sources of early visual activity in known locations in the occipital cortex. We localized sources of retinotopic MEG signals from the human brain with contrasting reconstruction approaches (minimum norm, multiple sparse priors, and beamformer) and compared these to the visual retinotopic map obtained with fMRI in the same individuals. When reconstructing brain responses to visual stimuli that differed by angular position, we found reliable localization to the appropriate retinotopic visual field quadrant by a minimum norm approach and by beamforming. Retinotopic map eccentricity in accordance with the fMRI map could not consistently be localized using an annular stimulus with any reconstruction method, but confining eccentricity stimuli to one visual field quadrant resulted in significant improvement with the minimum norm. These results inform the application of source analysis approaches for future MEG studies of the visual system, and indicate some current limits on localization accuracy of MEG signals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4034416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40344162014-06-05 Localization of MEG human brain responses to retinotopic visual stimuli with contrasting source reconstruction approaches Cicmil, Nela Bridge, Holly Parker, Andrew J. Woolrich, Mark W. Krug, Kristine Front Neurosci Neuroscience Magnetoencephalography (MEG) allows the physiological recording of human brain activity at high temporal resolution. However, spatial localization of the source of the MEG signal is an ill-posed problem as the signal alone cannot constrain a unique solution and additional prior assumptions must be enforced. An adequate source reconstruction method for investigating the human visual system should place the sources of early visual activity in known locations in the occipital cortex. We localized sources of retinotopic MEG signals from the human brain with contrasting reconstruction approaches (minimum norm, multiple sparse priors, and beamformer) and compared these to the visual retinotopic map obtained with fMRI in the same individuals. When reconstructing brain responses to visual stimuli that differed by angular position, we found reliable localization to the appropriate retinotopic visual field quadrant by a minimum norm approach and by beamforming. Retinotopic map eccentricity in accordance with the fMRI map could not consistently be localized using an annular stimulus with any reconstruction method, but confining eccentricity stimuli to one visual field quadrant resulted in significant improvement with the minimum norm. These results inform the application of source analysis approaches for future MEG studies of the visual system, and indicate some current limits on localization accuracy of MEG signals. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4034416/ /pubmed/24904268 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00127 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cicmil, Bridge, Parker, Woolrich and Krug. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Cicmil, Nela
Bridge, Holly
Parker, Andrew J.
Woolrich, Mark W.
Krug, Kristine
Localization of MEG human brain responses to retinotopic visual stimuli with contrasting source reconstruction approaches
title Localization of MEG human brain responses to retinotopic visual stimuli with contrasting source reconstruction approaches
title_full Localization of MEG human brain responses to retinotopic visual stimuli with contrasting source reconstruction approaches
title_fullStr Localization of MEG human brain responses to retinotopic visual stimuli with contrasting source reconstruction approaches
title_full_unstemmed Localization of MEG human brain responses to retinotopic visual stimuli with contrasting source reconstruction approaches
title_short Localization of MEG human brain responses to retinotopic visual stimuli with contrasting source reconstruction approaches
title_sort localization of meg human brain responses to retinotopic visual stimuli with contrasting source reconstruction approaches
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4034416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904268
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00127
work_keys_str_mv AT cicmilnela localizationofmeghumanbrainresponsestoretinotopicvisualstimuliwithcontrastingsourcereconstructionapproaches
AT bridgeholly localizationofmeghumanbrainresponsestoretinotopicvisualstimuliwithcontrastingsourcereconstructionapproaches
AT parkerandrewj localizationofmeghumanbrainresponsestoretinotopicvisualstimuliwithcontrastingsourcereconstructionapproaches
AT woolrichmarkw localizationofmeghumanbrainresponsestoretinotopicvisualstimuliwithcontrastingsourcereconstructionapproaches
AT krugkristine localizationofmeghumanbrainresponsestoretinotopicvisualstimuliwithcontrastingsourcereconstructionapproaches