Cargando…

Does Repeated Ticking Maintain Tic Behavior? An Experimental Study of Eye Blinking in Healthy Individuals

Tics in Tourette syndrome (TS) are often preceded by “premonitory urges”: annoying feelings or bodily sensations. We hypothesized that, by reducing annoyance of premonitory urges, tic behaviour may be reinforced. In a 2 × 2 experimental design in healthy participants, we studied the effects of premo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beetsma, Daniel J. V., van den Hout, Marcel A., Engelhard, Iris M., Rijkeboer, Marleen M., Cath, Danielle C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4034442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24899785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/753020
_version_ 1782317966141947904
author Beetsma, Daniel J. V.
van den Hout, Marcel A.
Engelhard, Iris M.
Rijkeboer, Marleen M.
Cath, Danielle C.
author_facet Beetsma, Daniel J. V.
van den Hout, Marcel A.
Engelhard, Iris M.
Rijkeboer, Marleen M.
Cath, Danielle C.
author_sort Beetsma, Daniel J. V.
collection PubMed
description Tics in Tourette syndrome (TS) are often preceded by “premonitory urges”: annoying feelings or bodily sensations. We hypothesized that, by reducing annoyance of premonitory urges, tic behaviour may be reinforced. In a 2 × 2 experimental design in healthy participants, we studied the effects of premonitory urges (operationalized as air puffs on the eye) and tic behaviour (deliberate eye blinking after a puff or a sound) on changes in subjective evaluation of air puffs and EMG responses on the m. orbicularis oculi. The experimental group with air puffs + blinking experienced a decrease in subjective annoyance of the air puff, but habituation of the EMG response was blocked and length of EMG response increased. In the control groups (air puffs without instruction to blink, no air puffs), these effects were absent. When extrapolating to the situation in TS patients, these findings suggest that performance of tics is reinforced by reducing the subjective annoyance of premonitory urges, while simultaneously preventing habituation or even inducing sensitisation of the physiological motor response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4034442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40344422014-06-04 Does Repeated Ticking Maintain Tic Behavior? An Experimental Study of Eye Blinking in Healthy Individuals Beetsma, Daniel J. V. van den Hout, Marcel A. Engelhard, Iris M. Rijkeboer, Marleen M. Cath, Danielle C. Behav Neurol Clinical Study Tics in Tourette syndrome (TS) are often preceded by “premonitory urges”: annoying feelings or bodily sensations. We hypothesized that, by reducing annoyance of premonitory urges, tic behaviour may be reinforced. In a 2 × 2 experimental design in healthy participants, we studied the effects of premonitory urges (operationalized as air puffs on the eye) and tic behaviour (deliberate eye blinking after a puff or a sound) on changes in subjective evaluation of air puffs and EMG responses on the m. orbicularis oculi. The experimental group with air puffs + blinking experienced a decrease in subjective annoyance of the air puff, but habituation of the EMG response was blocked and length of EMG response increased. In the control groups (air puffs without instruction to blink, no air puffs), these effects were absent. When extrapolating to the situation in TS patients, these findings suggest that performance of tics is reinforced by reducing the subjective annoyance of premonitory urges, while simultaneously preventing habituation or even inducing sensitisation of the physiological motor response. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4034442/ /pubmed/24899785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/753020 Text en Copyright © 2014 Daniel J. V. Beetsma et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Beetsma, Daniel J. V.
van den Hout, Marcel A.
Engelhard, Iris M.
Rijkeboer, Marleen M.
Cath, Danielle C.
Does Repeated Ticking Maintain Tic Behavior? An Experimental Study of Eye Blinking in Healthy Individuals
title Does Repeated Ticking Maintain Tic Behavior? An Experimental Study of Eye Blinking in Healthy Individuals
title_full Does Repeated Ticking Maintain Tic Behavior? An Experimental Study of Eye Blinking in Healthy Individuals
title_fullStr Does Repeated Ticking Maintain Tic Behavior? An Experimental Study of Eye Blinking in Healthy Individuals
title_full_unstemmed Does Repeated Ticking Maintain Tic Behavior? An Experimental Study of Eye Blinking in Healthy Individuals
title_short Does Repeated Ticking Maintain Tic Behavior? An Experimental Study of Eye Blinking in Healthy Individuals
title_sort does repeated ticking maintain tic behavior? an experimental study of eye blinking in healthy individuals
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4034442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24899785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/753020
work_keys_str_mv AT beetsmadanieljv doesrepeatedtickingmaintainticbehavioranexperimentalstudyofeyeblinkinginhealthyindividuals
AT vandenhoutmarcela doesrepeatedtickingmaintainticbehavioranexperimentalstudyofeyeblinkinginhealthyindividuals
AT engelhardirism doesrepeatedtickingmaintainticbehavioranexperimentalstudyofeyeblinkinginhealthyindividuals
AT rijkeboermarleenm doesrepeatedtickingmaintainticbehavioranexperimentalstudyofeyeblinkinginhealthyindividuals
AT cathdaniellec doesrepeatedtickingmaintainticbehavioranexperimentalstudyofeyeblinkinginhealthyindividuals