Cargando…

Figure of Image Quality and Information Capacity in Digital Mammography

Objectives. In this work, a simple technique to assess the image quality characteristics of the postprocessed image is developed and an easy to use figure of image quality (FIQ) is introduced. This FIQ characterizes images in terms of resolution and noise. In addition information capacity, defined w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michail, Christos M., Kalyvas, Nektarios E., Valais, Ioannis G., Fudos, Ioannis P., Fountos, George P., Dimitropoulos, Nikos, Koulouras, Grigorios, Kandris, Dionisis, Samarakou, Maria, Kandarakis, Ioannis S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4034480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24895593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/634856
_version_ 1782317968447766528
author Michail, Christos M.
Kalyvas, Nektarios E.
Valais, Ioannis G.
Fudos, Ioannis P.
Fountos, George P.
Dimitropoulos, Nikos
Koulouras, Grigorios
Kandris, Dionisis
Samarakou, Maria
Kandarakis, Ioannis S.
author_facet Michail, Christos M.
Kalyvas, Nektarios E.
Valais, Ioannis G.
Fudos, Ioannis P.
Fountos, George P.
Dimitropoulos, Nikos
Koulouras, Grigorios
Kandris, Dionisis
Samarakou, Maria
Kandarakis, Ioannis S.
author_sort Michail, Christos M.
collection PubMed
description Objectives. In this work, a simple technique to assess the image quality characteristics of the postprocessed image is developed and an easy to use figure of image quality (FIQ) is introduced. This FIQ characterizes images in terms of resolution and noise. In addition information capacity, defined within the context of Shannon's information theory, was used as an overall image quality index. Materials and Methods. A digital mammographic image was postprocessed with three digital filters. Resolution and noise were calculated via the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), the coefficient of variation, and the figure of image quality. In addition, frequency dependent parameters such as the noise power spectrum (NPS) and noise equivalent quanta (NEQ) were estimated and used to assess information capacity. Results. FIQs for the “raw image” data and the image processed with the “sharpen edges” filter were found 907.3 and 1906.1, correspondingly. The information capacity values were 60.86 × 10(3) and 78.96 × 10(3) bits/mm(2). Conclusion. It was found that, after the application of the postprocessing techniques (even commercial nondedicated software) on the raw digital mammograms, MTF, NPS, and NEQ are improved for medium to high spatial frequencies leading to resolving smaller structures in the final image.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4034480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40344802014-06-03 Figure of Image Quality and Information Capacity in Digital Mammography Michail, Christos M. Kalyvas, Nektarios E. Valais, Ioannis G. Fudos, Ioannis P. Fountos, George P. Dimitropoulos, Nikos Koulouras, Grigorios Kandris, Dionisis Samarakou, Maria Kandarakis, Ioannis S. Biomed Res Int Research Article Objectives. In this work, a simple technique to assess the image quality characteristics of the postprocessed image is developed and an easy to use figure of image quality (FIQ) is introduced. This FIQ characterizes images in terms of resolution and noise. In addition information capacity, defined within the context of Shannon's information theory, was used as an overall image quality index. Materials and Methods. A digital mammographic image was postprocessed with three digital filters. Resolution and noise were calculated via the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), the coefficient of variation, and the figure of image quality. In addition, frequency dependent parameters such as the noise power spectrum (NPS) and noise equivalent quanta (NEQ) were estimated and used to assess information capacity. Results. FIQs for the “raw image” data and the image processed with the “sharpen edges” filter were found 907.3 and 1906.1, correspondingly. The information capacity values were 60.86 × 10(3) and 78.96 × 10(3) bits/mm(2). Conclusion. It was found that, after the application of the postprocessing techniques (even commercial nondedicated software) on the raw digital mammograms, MTF, NPS, and NEQ are improved for medium to high spatial frequencies leading to resolving smaller structures in the final image. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4034480/ /pubmed/24895593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/634856 Text en Copyright © 2014 Christos M. Michail et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Michail, Christos M.
Kalyvas, Nektarios E.
Valais, Ioannis G.
Fudos, Ioannis P.
Fountos, George P.
Dimitropoulos, Nikos
Koulouras, Grigorios
Kandris, Dionisis
Samarakou, Maria
Kandarakis, Ioannis S.
Figure of Image Quality and Information Capacity in Digital Mammography
title Figure of Image Quality and Information Capacity in Digital Mammography
title_full Figure of Image Quality and Information Capacity in Digital Mammography
title_fullStr Figure of Image Quality and Information Capacity in Digital Mammography
title_full_unstemmed Figure of Image Quality and Information Capacity in Digital Mammography
title_short Figure of Image Quality and Information Capacity in Digital Mammography
title_sort figure of image quality and information capacity in digital mammography
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4034480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24895593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/634856
work_keys_str_mv AT michailchristosm figureofimagequalityandinformationcapacityindigitalmammography
AT kalyvasnektariose figureofimagequalityandinformationcapacityindigitalmammography
AT valaisioannisg figureofimagequalityandinformationcapacityindigitalmammography
AT fudosioannisp figureofimagequalityandinformationcapacityindigitalmammography
AT fountosgeorgep figureofimagequalityandinformationcapacityindigitalmammography
AT dimitropoulosnikos figureofimagequalityandinformationcapacityindigitalmammography
AT koulourasgrigorios figureofimagequalityandinformationcapacityindigitalmammography
AT kandrisdionisis figureofimagequalityandinformationcapacityindigitalmammography
AT samarakoumaria figureofimagequalityandinformationcapacityindigitalmammography
AT kandarakisioanniss figureofimagequalityandinformationcapacityindigitalmammography