Cargando…

Balanced neural architecture and the idling brain

A signature feature of cortical spike trains is their trial-to-trial variability. This variability is large in the spontaneous state and is reduced when cortex is driven by a stimulus or task. Models of recurrent cortical networks with unstructured, yet balanced, excitation and inhibition generate v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doiron, Brent, Litwin-Kumar, Ashok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4034496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904394
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2014.00056
_version_ 1782317971919601664
author Doiron, Brent
Litwin-Kumar, Ashok
author_facet Doiron, Brent
Litwin-Kumar, Ashok
author_sort Doiron, Brent
collection PubMed
description A signature feature of cortical spike trains is their trial-to-trial variability. This variability is large in the spontaneous state and is reduced when cortex is driven by a stimulus or task. Models of recurrent cortical networks with unstructured, yet balanced, excitation and inhibition generate variability consistent with evoked conditions. However, these models produce spike trains which lack the long timescale fluctuations and large variability exhibited during spontaneous cortical dynamics. We propose that global network architectures which support a large number of stable states (attractor networks) allow balanced networks to capture key features of neural variability in both spontaneous and evoked conditions. We illustrate this using balanced spiking networks with clustered assembly, feedforward chain, and ring structures. By assuming that global network structure is related to stimulus preference, we show that signal correlations are related to the magnitude of correlations in the spontaneous state. Finally, we contrast the impact of stimulation on the trial-to-trial variability in attractor networks with that of strongly coupled spiking networks with chaotic firing rate instabilities, recently investigated by Ostojic (2014). We find that only attractor networks replicate an experimentally observed stimulus-induced quenching of trial-to-trial variability. In total, the comparison of the trial-variable dynamics of single neurons or neuron pairs during spontaneous and evoked activity can be a window into the global structure of balanced cortical networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4034496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40344962014-06-05 Balanced neural architecture and the idling brain Doiron, Brent Litwin-Kumar, Ashok Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience A signature feature of cortical spike trains is their trial-to-trial variability. This variability is large in the spontaneous state and is reduced when cortex is driven by a stimulus or task. Models of recurrent cortical networks with unstructured, yet balanced, excitation and inhibition generate variability consistent with evoked conditions. However, these models produce spike trains which lack the long timescale fluctuations and large variability exhibited during spontaneous cortical dynamics. We propose that global network architectures which support a large number of stable states (attractor networks) allow balanced networks to capture key features of neural variability in both spontaneous and evoked conditions. We illustrate this using balanced spiking networks with clustered assembly, feedforward chain, and ring structures. By assuming that global network structure is related to stimulus preference, we show that signal correlations are related to the magnitude of correlations in the spontaneous state. Finally, we contrast the impact of stimulation on the trial-to-trial variability in attractor networks with that of strongly coupled spiking networks with chaotic firing rate instabilities, recently investigated by Ostojic (2014). We find that only attractor networks replicate an experimentally observed stimulus-induced quenching of trial-to-trial variability. In total, the comparison of the trial-variable dynamics of single neurons or neuron pairs during spontaneous and evoked activity can be a window into the global structure of balanced cortical networks. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4034496/ /pubmed/24904394 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2014.00056 Text en Copyright © 2014 Doiron and Litwin-Kumar. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Doiron, Brent
Litwin-Kumar, Ashok
Balanced neural architecture and the idling brain
title Balanced neural architecture and the idling brain
title_full Balanced neural architecture and the idling brain
title_fullStr Balanced neural architecture and the idling brain
title_full_unstemmed Balanced neural architecture and the idling brain
title_short Balanced neural architecture and the idling brain
title_sort balanced neural architecture and the idling brain
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4034496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904394
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2014.00056
work_keys_str_mv AT doironbrent balancedneuralarchitectureandtheidlingbrain
AT litwinkumarashok balancedneuralarchitectureandtheidlingbrain