Cargando…
Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study
Aim: Recent advances including the incorporation of antibacterial substances, such as chlorhexidine, into restorative materials such as glass ionoer cement (GIC), might alter the physical properties of the material, which might affect the marginal seal of the restorations. Hence, the objective of th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4034633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25206179 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1177 |
_version_ | 1782317993157459968 |
---|---|
author | Mathew, Sherryl Mary Thomas, Abi Mathew Koshy, George Dua, Kapil |
author_facet | Mathew, Sherryl Mary Thomas, Abi Mathew Koshy, George Dua, Kapil |
author_sort | Mathew, Sherryl Mary |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim: Recent advances including the incorporation of antibacterial substances, such as chlorhexidine, into restorative materials such as glass ionoer cement (GIC), might alter the physical properties of the material, which might affect the marginal seal of the restorations. Hence, the objective of this study was to compare the marginal sealing ability of GC Fuji IX modified with 1% chlorhexidine diacetate and conventional GC Fuji IX. Materials and methods: Sixty healthy molars were selected from the oral cavities of 30 children. The teeth were divided into two groups: Group I, teeth restored with 1% chlorhexidine diacetate modified GC Fuji IX and group II, teeth restored with GC Fuji IX. The restored teeth were extracted following 4 weeks and immersed in 2% basic fuchsin solution for 24 hours. They were then sectioned and scored under a light microscope of 10 × 10 magnification for dye penetration. Results: On statistical analysis difference between Chlorhexidine-Modified GIC group and GIC group with regard to grade of microleakage was found to be statistically nonsignificant (p = 0.543). Conclusion: Since, addition of 1% chlorhexidine diacetate to GC Fuji IX showed comparable results with regard to microleakage, it can be considered a valuable alternative especially in atraumatic restorative treatment and for general clinical utility in restorative dentistry. How to cite this article: Mathew SM, Thomas AM, Koshy G, Dua K. Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013;6(1):7-11. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4034633 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40346332014-09-09 Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study Mathew, Sherryl Mary Thomas, Abi Mathew Koshy, George Dua, Kapil Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Research Article Aim: Recent advances including the incorporation of antibacterial substances, such as chlorhexidine, into restorative materials such as glass ionoer cement (GIC), might alter the physical properties of the material, which might affect the marginal seal of the restorations. Hence, the objective of this study was to compare the marginal sealing ability of GC Fuji IX modified with 1% chlorhexidine diacetate and conventional GC Fuji IX. Materials and methods: Sixty healthy molars were selected from the oral cavities of 30 children. The teeth were divided into two groups: Group I, teeth restored with 1% chlorhexidine diacetate modified GC Fuji IX and group II, teeth restored with GC Fuji IX. The restored teeth were extracted following 4 weeks and immersed in 2% basic fuchsin solution for 24 hours. They were then sectioned and scored under a light microscope of 10 × 10 magnification for dye penetration. Results: On statistical analysis difference between Chlorhexidine-Modified GIC group and GIC group with regard to grade of microleakage was found to be statistically nonsignificant (p = 0.543). Conclusion: Since, addition of 1% chlorhexidine diacetate to GC Fuji IX showed comparable results with regard to microleakage, it can be considered a valuable alternative especially in atraumatic restorative treatment and for general clinical utility in restorative dentistry. How to cite this article: Mathew SM, Thomas AM, Koshy G, Dua K. Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013;6(1):7-11. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2013 2013-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4034633/ /pubmed/25206179 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1177 Text en Copyright © 2013; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mathew, Sherryl Mary Thomas, Abi Mathew Koshy, George Dua, Kapil Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study |
title | Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study |
title_full | Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study |
title_short | Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study |
title_sort | evaluation of the microleakage of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: an in vivo study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4034633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25206179 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1177 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mathewsherrylmary evaluationofthemicroleakageofchlorhexidinemodifiedglassionomercementaninvivostudy AT thomasabimathew evaluationofthemicroleakageofchlorhexidinemodifiedglassionomercementaninvivostudy AT koshygeorge evaluationofthemicroleakageofchlorhexidinemodifiedglassionomercementaninvivostudy AT duakapil evaluationofthemicroleakageofchlorhexidinemodifiedglassionomercementaninvivostudy |