Cargando…

Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study

Aim: Recent advances including the incorporation of antibacterial substances, such as chlorhexidine, into restorative materials such as glass ionoer cement (GIC), might alter the physical properties of the material, which might affect the marginal seal of the restorations. Hence, the objective of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mathew, Sherryl Mary, Thomas, Abi Mathew, Koshy, George, Dua, Kapil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4034633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25206179
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1177
_version_ 1782317993157459968
author Mathew, Sherryl Mary
Thomas, Abi Mathew
Koshy, George
Dua, Kapil
author_facet Mathew, Sherryl Mary
Thomas, Abi Mathew
Koshy, George
Dua, Kapil
author_sort Mathew, Sherryl Mary
collection PubMed
description Aim: Recent advances including the incorporation of antibacterial substances, such as chlorhexidine, into restorative materials such as glass ionoer cement (GIC), might alter the physical properties of the material, which might affect the marginal seal of the restorations. Hence, the objective of this study was to compare the marginal sealing ability of GC Fuji IX modified with 1% chlorhexidine diacetate and conventional GC Fuji IX. Materials and methods: Sixty healthy molars were selected from the oral cavities of 30 children. The teeth were divided into two groups: Group I, teeth restored with 1% chlorhexidine diacetate modified GC Fuji IX and group II, teeth restored with GC Fuji IX. The restored teeth were extracted following 4 weeks and immersed in 2% basic fuchsin solution for 24 hours. They were then sectioned and scored under a light microscope of 10 × 10 magnification for dye penetration. Results: On statistical analysis difference between Chlorhexidine-Modified GIC group and GIC group with regard to grade of microleakage was found to be statistically nonsignificant (p = 0.543). Conclusion: Since, addition of 1% chlorhexidine diacetate to GC Fuji IX showed comparable results with regard to microleakage, it can be considered a valuable alternative especially in atraumatic restorative treatment and for general clinical utility in restorative dentistry. How to cite this article: Mathew SM, Thomas AM, Koshy G, Dua K. Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013;6(1):7-11.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4034633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40346332014-09-09 Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study Mathew, Sherryl Mary Thomas, Abi Mathew Koshy, George Dua, Kapil Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Research Article Aim: Recent advances including the incorporation of antibacterial substances, such as chlorhexidine, into restorative materials such as glass ionoer cement (GIC), might alter the physical properties of the material, which might affect the marginal seal of the restorations. Hence, the objective of this study was to compare the marginal sealing ability of GC Fuji IX modified with 1% chlorhexidine diacetate and conventional GC Fuji IX. Materials and methods: Sixty healthy molars were selected from the oral cavities of 30 children. The teeth were divided into two groups: Group I, teeth restored with 1% chlorhexidine diacetate modified GC Fuji IX and group II, teeth restored with GC Fuji IX. The restored teeth were extracted following 4 weeks and immersed in 2% basic fuchsin solution for 24 hours. They were then sectioned and scored under a light microscope of 10 × 10 magnification for dye penetration. Results: On statistical analysis difference between Chlorhexidine-Modified GIC group and GIC group with regard to grade of microleakage was found to be statistically nonsignificant (p = 0.543). Conclusion: Since, addition of 1% chlorhexidine diacetate to GC Fuji IX showed comparable results with regard to microleakage, it can be considered a valuable alternative especially in atraumatic restorative treatment and for general clinical utility in restorative dentistry. How to cite this article: Mathew SM, Thomas AM, Koshy G, Dua K. Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013;6(1):7-11. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2013 2013-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4034633/ /pubmed/25206179 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1177 Text en Copyright © 2013; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Research Article
Mathew, Sherryl Mary
Thomas, Abi Mathew
Koshy, George
Dua, Kapil
Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study
title Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study
title_full Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study
title_short Evaluation of the Microleakage of Chlorhexidine-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An in vivo Study
title_sort evaluation of the microleakage of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: an in vivo study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4034633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25206179
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1177
work_keys_str_mv AT mathewsherrylmary evaluationofthemicroleakageofchlorhexidinemodifiedglassionomercementaninvivostudy
AT thomasabimathew evaluationofthemicroleakageofchlorhexidinemodifiedglassionomercementaninvivostudy
AT koshygeorge evaluationofthemicroleakageofchlorhexidinemodifiedglassionomercementaninvivostudy
AT duakapil evaluationofthemicroleakageofchlorhexidinemodifiedglassionomercementaninvivostudy