Cargando…

Domain-Specific Control of Selective Attention

Previous research has shown that loading information on working memory affects selective attention. However, whether the load effect on selective attention is domain-general or domain-specific remains unresolved. The domain-general effect refers to the findings that load in one content (e.g. phonolo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Szu-Hung, Yeh, Yei-Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4035299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24866977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098260
_version_ 1782318042179436544
author Lin, Szu-Hung
Yeh, Yei-Yu
author_facet Lin, Szu-Hung
Yeh, Yei-Yu
author_sort Lin, Szu-Hung
collection PubMed
description Previous research has shown that loading information on working memory affects selective attention. However, whether the load effect on selective attention is domain-general or domain-specific remains unresolved. The domain-general effect refers to the findings that load in one content (e.g. phonological) domain in working memory influences processing in another content (e.g., visuospatial) domain. Attentional control supervises selection regardless of information domain. The domain-specific effect refers to the constraint of influence only when maintenance and processing operate in the same domain. Selective attention operates in a specific content domain. This study is designed to resolve this controversy. Across three experiments, we manipulated the type of representation maintained in working memory and the type of representation upon which the participants must exert control to resolve conflict and select a target into the focus of attention. In Experiments 1a and 1b, participants maintained digits and nonverbalized objects, respectively, in working memory while selecting a target in a letter array. In Experiment 2, we presented auditory digits with a letter flanker task to exclude the involvement of resource competition within the same input modality. In Experiments 3a and 3b, we replaced the letter flanker task with an object flanker task while manipulating the memory load on object and digit representation, respectively. The results consistently showed that memory load modulated distractibility only when the stimuli of the two tasks were represented in the same domain. The magnitude of distractor interference was larger under high load than under low load, reflecting a lower efficacy of information prioritization. When the stimuli of the two tasks were represented in different domains, memory load did not modulate distractibility. Control of processing priority in selective attention demands domain-specific resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4035299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40352992014-06-02 Domain-Specific Control of Selective Attention Lin, Szu-Hung Yeh, Yei-Yu PLoS One Research Article Previous research has shown that loading information on working memory affects selective attention. However, whether the load effect on selective attention is domain-general or domain-specific remains unresolved. The domain-general effect refers to the findings that load in one content (e.g. phonological) domain in working memory influences processing in another content (e.g., visuospatial) domain. Attentional control supervises selection regardless of information domain. The domain-specific effect refers to the constraint of influence only when maintenance and processing operate in the same domain. Selective attention operates in a specific content domain. This study is designed to resolve this controversy. Across three experiments, we manipulated the type of representation maintained in working memory and the type of representation upon which the participants must exert control to resolve conflict and select a target into the focus of attention. In Experiments 1a and 1b, participants maintained digits and nonverbalized objects, respectively, in working memory while selecting a target in a letter array. In Experiment 2, we presented auditory digits with a letter flanker task to exclude the involvement of resource competition within the same input modality. In Experiments 3a and 3b, we replaced the letter flanker task with an object flanker task while manipulating the memory load on object and digit representation, respectively. The results consistently showed that memory load modulated distractibility only when the stimuli of the two tasks were represented in the same domain. The magnitude of distractor interference was larger under high load than under low load, reflecting a lower efficacy of information prioritization. When the stimuli of the two tasks were represented in different domains, memory load did not modulate distractibility. Control of processing priority in selective attention demands domain-specific resources. Public Library of Science 2014-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4035299/ /pubmed/24866977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098260 Text en © 2014 Lin and Yeh http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lin, Szu-Hung
Yeh, Yei-Yu
Domain-Specific Control of Selective Attention
title Domain-Specific Control of Selective Attention
title_full Domain-Specific Control of Selective Attention
title_fullStr Domain-Specific Control of Selective Attention
title_full_unstemmed Domain-Specific Control of Selective Attention
title_short Domain-Specific Control of Selective Attention
title_sort domain-specific control of selective attention
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4035299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24866977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098260
work_keys_str_mv AT linszuhung domainspecificcontrolofselectiveattention
AT yehyeiyu domainspecificcontrolofselectiveattention