Cargando…
Comparison of Laparoscopic, Hand-Assisted, and Open Surgical Nephroureterectomy
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer. METHODS: Between April 1995 and August 2010, 189 patients un...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4035642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24960495 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13794522666842 |
_version_ | 1782318078505254912 |
---|---|
author | Kitamura, Hiroshi Maeda, Toshihiro Tanaka, Toshiaki Fukuta, Fumimasa Kobayashi, Ko Nishiyama, Naotaka Takahashi, Satoshi Masumori, Naoya |
author_facet | Kitamura, Hiroshi Maeda, Toshihiro Tanaka, Toshiaki Fukuta, Fumimasa Kobayashi, Ko Nishiyama, Naotaka Takahashi, Satoshi Masumori, Naoya |
author_sort | Kitamura, Hiroshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer. METHODS: Between April 1995 and August 2010, 189 patients underwent laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, or open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer. Of these patients, 110 with no previous or concurrent bladder cancer or any metastatic disease were included in this study. Cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival, and intravesical recurrence-free survival rates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. The median follow-up period for the cohort was 70 months (range, 6–192 months). RESULTS: The 3 groups were well matched for tumor stage, grade, and the presence of lymphovascular invasion and concomitant carcinoma in situ. The estimated 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 81.1%, 65.6%, and 65.2% for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy, respectively (P = .4179). The estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 33.8%, 10.0%, and 41.2% for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy, respectively (P = .0245). The estimated 5-year intravesical recurrence-free survival rates were 64.8%, 10.0%, and 76.2% for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy, respectively (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Although there was no significant difference in cancer-specific survival rate among the laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy groups, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy may be inferior to laparoscopic nephroureterectomy or open nephroureterectomy with regard to recurrence-free survival and intravesical recurrence-free survival rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4035642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40356422014-06-04 Comparison of Laparoscopic, Hand-Assisted, and Open Surgical Nephroureterectomy Kitamura, Hiroshi Maeda, Toshihiro Tanaka, Toshiaki Fukuta, Fumimasa Kobayashi, Ko Nishiyama, Naotaka Takahashi, Satoshi Masumori, Naoya JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer. METHODS: Between April 1995 and August 2010, 189 patients underwent laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, or open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer. Of these patients, 110 with no previous or concurrent bladder cancer or any metastatic disease were included in this study. Cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival, and intravesical recurrence-free survival rates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. The median follow-up period for the cohort was 70 months (range, 6–192 months). RESULTS: The 3 groups were well matched for tumor stage, grade, and the presence of lymphovascular invasion and concomitant carcinoma in situ. The estimated 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 81.1%, 65.6%, and 65.2% for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy, respectively (P = .4179). The estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 33.8%, 10.0%, and 41.2% for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy, respectively (P = .0245). The estimated 5-year intravesical recurrence-free survival rates were 64.8%, 10.0%, and 76.2% for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy, respectively (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Although there was no significant difference in cancer-specific survival rate among the laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy groups, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy may be inferior to laparoscopic nephroureterectomy or open nephroureterectomy with regard to recurrence-free survival and intravesical recurrence-free survival rates. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4035642/ /pubmed/24960495 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13794522666842 Text en © 2014 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Papers Kitamura, Hiroshi Maeda, Toshihiro Tanaka, Toshiaki Fukuta, Fumimasa Kobayashi, Ko Nishiyama, Naotaka Takahashi, Satoshi Masumori, Naoya Comparison of Laparoscopic, Hand-Assisted, and Open Surgical Nephroureterectomy |
title | Comparison of Laparoscopic, Hand-Assisted, and Open Surgical Nephroureterectomy |
title_full | Comparison of Laparoscopic, Hand-Assisted, and Open Surgical Nephroureterectomy |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Laparoscopic, Hand-Assisted, and Open Surgical Nephroureterectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Laparoscopic, Hand-Assisted, and Open Surgical Nephroureterectomy |
title_short | Comparison of Laparoscopic, Hand-Assisted, and Open Surgical Nephroureterectomy |
title_sort | comparison of laparoscopic, hand-assisted, and open surgical nephroureterectomy |
topic | Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4035642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24960495 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13794522666842 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kitamurahiroshi comparisonoflaparoscopichandassistedandopensurgicalnephroureterectomy AT maedatoshihiro comparisonoflaparoscopichandassistedandopensurgicalnephroureterectomy AT tanakatoshiaki comparisonoflaparoscopichandassistedandopensurgicalnephroureterectomy AT fukutafumimasa comparisonoflaparoscopichandassistedandopensurgicalnephroureterectomy AT kobayashiko comparisonoflaparoscopichandassistedandopensurgicalnephroureterectomy AT nishiyamanaotaka comparisonoflaparoscopichandassistedandopensurgicalnephroureterectomy AT takahashisatoshi comparisonoflaparoscopichandassistedandopensurgicalnephroureterectomy AT masumorinaoya comparisonoflaparoscopichandassistedandopensurgicalnephroureterectomy |