Cargando…

Comparison of Laparoscopic, Hand-Assisted, and Open Surgical Nephroureterectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer. METHODS: Between April 1995 and August 2010, 189 patients un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitamura, Hiroshi, Maeda, Toshihiro, Tanaka, Toshiaki, Fukuta, Fumimasa, Kobayashi, Ko, Nishiyama, Naotaka, Takahashi, Satoshi, Masumori, Naoya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4035642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24960495
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13794522666842
_version_ 1782318078505254912
author Kitamura, Hiroshi
Maeda, Toshihiro
Tanaka, Toshiaki
Fukuta, Fumimasa
Kobayashi, Ko
Nishiyama, Naotaka
Takahashi, Satoshi
Masumori, Naoya
author_facet Kitamura, Hiroshi
Maeda, Toshihiro
Tanaka, Toshiaki
Fukuta, Fumimasa
Kobayashi, Ko
Nishiyama, Naotaka
Takahashi, Satoshi
Masumori, Naoya
author_sort Kitamura, Hiroshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer. METHODS: Between April 1995 and August 2010, 189 patients underwent laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, or open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer. Of these patients, 110 with no previous or concurrent bladder cancer or any metastatic disease were included in this study. Cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival, and intravesical recurrence-free survival rates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. The median follow-up period for the cohort was 70 months (range, 6–192 months). RESULTS: The 3 groups were well matched for tumor stage, grade, and the presence of lymphovascular invasion and concomitant carcinoma in situ. The estimated 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 81.1%, 65.6%, and 65.2% for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy, respectively (P = .4179). The estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 33.8%, 10.0%, and 41.2% for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy, respectively (P = .0245). The estimated 5-year intravesical recurrence-free survival rates were 64.8%, 10.0%, and 76.2% for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy, respectively (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Although there was no significant difference in cancer-specific survival rate among the laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy groups, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy may be inferior to laparoscopic nephroureterectomy or open nephroureterectomy with regard to recurrence-free survival and intravesical recurrence-free survival rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4035642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40356422014-06-04 Comparison of Laparoscopic, Hand-Assisted, and Open Surgical Nephroureterectomy Kitamura, Hiroshi Maeda, Toshihiro Tanaka, Toshiaki Fukuta, Fumimasa Kobayashi, Ko Nishiyama, Naotaka Takahashi, Satoshi Masumori, Naoya JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer. METHODS: Between April 1995 and August 2010, 189 patients underwent laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, or open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer. Of these patients, 110 with no previous or concurrent bladder cancer or any metastatic disease were included in this study. Cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival, and intravesical recurrence-free survival rates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. The median follow-up period for the cohort was 70 months (range, 6–192 months). RESULTS: The 3 groups were well matched for tumor stage, grade, and the presence of lymphovascular invasion and concomitant carcinoma in situ. The estimated 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 81.1%, 65.6%, and 65.2% for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy, respectively (P = .4179). The estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 33.8%, 10.0%, and 41.2% for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy, respectively (P = .0245). The estimated 5-year intravesical recurrence-free survival rates were 64.8%, 10.0%, and 76.2% for laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy, respectively (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Although there was no significant difference in cancer-specific survival rate among the laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and open nephroureterectomy groups, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy may be inferior to laparoscopic nephroureterectomy or open nephroureterectomy with regard to recurrence-free survival and intravesical recurrence-free survival rates. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4035642/ /pubmed/24960495 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13794522666842 Text en © 2014 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Kitamura, Hiroshi
Maeda, Toshihiro
Tanaka, Toshiaki
Fukuta, Fumimasa
Kobayashi, Ko
Nishiyama, Naotaka
Takahashi, Satoshi
Masumori, Naoya
Comparison of Laparoscopic, Hand-Assisted, and Open Surgical Nephroureterectomy
title Comparison of Laparoscopic, Hand-Assisted, and Open Surgical Nephroureterectomy
title_full Comparison of Laparoscopic, Hand-Assisted, and Open Surgical Nephroureterectomy
title_fullStr Comparison of Laparoscopic, Hand-Assisted, and Open Surgical Nephroureterectomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Laparoscopic, Hand-Assisted, and Open Surgical Nephroureterectomy
title_short Comparison of Laparoscopic, Hand-Assisted, and Open Surgical Nephroureterectomy
title_sort comparison of laparoscopic, hand-assisted, and open surgical nephroureterectomy
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4035642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24960495
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13794522666842
work_keys_str_mv AT kitamurahiroshi comparisonoflaparoscopichandassistedandopensurgicalnephroureterectomy
AT maedatoshihiro comparisonoflaparoscopichandassistedandopensurgicalnephroureterectomy
AT tanakatoshiaki comparisonoflaparoscopichandassistedandopensurgicalnephroureterectomy
AT fukutafumimasa comparisonoflaparoscopichandassistedandopensurgicalnephroureterectomy
AT kobayashiko comparisonoflaparoscopichandassistedandopensurgicalnephroureterectomy
AT nishiyamanaotaka comparisonoflaparoscopichandassistedandopensurgicalnephroureterectomy
AT takahashisatoshi comparisonoflaparoscopichandassistedandopensurgicalnephroureterectomy
AT masumorinaoya comparisonoflaparoscopichandassistedandopensurgicalnephroureterectomy