Cargando…
Genetic risk prediction and neurobiological understanding of alcoholism
We have used a translational Convergent Functional Genomics (CFG) approach to discover genes involved in alcoholism, by gene-level integration of genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from a German alcohol dependence cohort with other genetic and gene expression data, from human and animal model...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4035721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24844177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/tp.2014.29 |
_version_ | 1782318091521228800 |
---|---|
author | Levey, D F Le-Niculescu, H Frank, J Ayalew, M Jain, N Kirlin, B Learman, R Winiger, E Rodd, Z Shekhar, A Schork, N Kiefe, F Wodarz, N Müller-Myhsok, B Dahmen, N Nöthen, M Sherva, R Farrer, L Smith, A H Kranzler, H R Rietschel, M Gelernter, J Niculescu, A B |
author_facet | Levey, D F Le-Niculescu, H Frank, J Ayalew, M Jain, N Kirlin, B Learman, R Winiger, E Rodd, Z Shekhar, A Schork, N Kiefe, F Wodarz, N Müller-Myhsok, B Dahmen, N Nöthen, M Sherva, R Farrer, L Smith, A H Kranzler, H R Rietschel, M Gelernter, J Niculescu, A B |
author_sort | Levey, D F |
collection | PubMed |
description | We have used a translational Convergent Functional Genomics (CFG) approach to discover genes involved in alcoholism, by gene-level integration of genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from a German alcohol dependence cohort with other genetic and gene expression data, from human and animal model studies, similar to our previous work in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. A panel of all the nominally significant P-value SNPs in the top candidate genes discovered by CFG (n=135 genes, 713 SNPs) was used to generate a genetic risk prediction score (GRPS), which showed a trend towards significance (P=0.053) in separating alcohol dependent individuals from controls in an independent German test cohort. We then validated and prioritized our top findings from this discovery work, and subsequently tested them in three independent cohorts, from two continents. In order to validate and prioritize the key genes that drive behavior without some of the pleiotropic environmental confounds present in humans, we used a stress-reactive animal model of alcoholism developed by our group, the D-box binding protein (DBP) knockout mouse, consistent with the surfeit of stress theory of addiction proposed by Koob and colleagues. A much smaller panel (n=11 genes, 66 SNPs) of the top CFG-discovered genes for alcoholism, cross-validated and prioritized by this stress-reactive animal model showed better predictive ability in the independent German test cohort (P=0.041). The top CFG scoring gene for alcoholism from the initial discovery step, synuclein alpha (SNCA) remained the top gene after the stress-reactive animal model cross-validation. We also tested this small panel of genes in two other independent test cohorts from the United States, one with alcohol dependence (P=0.00012) and one with alcohol abuse (a less severe form of alcoholism; P=0.0094). SNCA by itself was able to separate alcoholics from controls in the alcohol-dependent cohort (P=0.000013) and the alcohol abuse cohort (P=0.023). So did eight other genes from the panel of 11 genes taken individually, albeit to a lesser extent and/or less broadly across cohorts. SNCA, GRM3 and MBP survived strict Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Taken together, these results suggest that our stress-reactive DBP animal model helped to validate and prioritize from the CFG-discovered genes some of the key behaviorally relevant genes for alcoholism. These genes fall into a series of biological pathways involved in signal transduction, transmission of nerve impulse (including myelination) and cocaine addiction. Overall, our work provides leads towards a better understanding of illness, diagnostics and therapeutics, including treatment with omega-3 fatty acids. We also examined the overlap between the top candidate genes for alcoholism from this work and the top candidate genes for bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety from previous CFG analyses conducted by us, as well as cross-tested genetic risk predictions. This revealed the significant genetic overlap with other major psychiatric disorder domains, providing a basis for comorbidity and dual diagnosis, and placing alcohol use in the broader context of modulating the mental landscape. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4035721 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40357212014-05-28 Genetic risk prediction and neurobiological understanding of alcoholism Levey, D F Le-Niculescu, H Frank, J Ayalew, M Jain, N Kirlin, B Learman, R Winiger, E Rodd, Z Shekhar, A Schork, N Kiefe, F Wodarz, N Müller-Myhsok, B Dahmen, N Nöthen, M Sherva, R Farrer, L Smith, A H Kranzler, H R Rietschel, M Gelernter, J Niculescu, A B Transl Psychiatry Original Article We have used a translational Convergent Functional Genomics (CFG) approach to discover genes involved in alcoholism, by gene-level integration of genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from a German alcohol dependence cohort with other genetic and gene expression data, from human and animal model studies, similar to our previous work in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. A panel of all the nominally significant P-value SNPs in the top candidate genes discovered by CFG (n=135 genes, 713 SNPs) was used to generate a genetic risk prediction score (GRPS), which showed a trend towards significance (P=0.053) in separating alcohol dependent individuals from controls in an independent German test cohort. We then validated and prioritized our top findings from this discovery work, and subsequently tested them in three independent cohorts, from two continents. In order to validate and prioritize the key genes that drive behavior without some of the pleiotropic environmental confounds present in humans, we used a stress-reactive animal model of alcoholism developed by our group, the D-box binding protein (DBP) knockout mouse, consistent with the surfeit of stress theory of addiction proposed by Koob and colleagues. A much smaller panel (n=11 genes, 66 SNPs) of the top CFG-discovered genes for alcoholism, cross-validated and prioritized by this stress-reactive animal model showed better predictive ability in the independent German test cohort (P=0.041). The top CFG scoring gene for alcoholism from the initial discovery step, synuclein alpha (SNCA) remained the top gene after the stress-reactive animal model cross-validation. We also tested this small panel of genes in two other independent test cohorts from the United States, one with alcohol dependence (P=0.00012) and one with alcohol abuse (a less severe form of alcoholism; P=0.0094). SNCA by itself was able to separate alcoholics from controls in the alcohol-dependent cohort (P=0.000013) and the alcohol abuse cohort (P=0.023). So did eight other genes from the panel of 11 genes taken individually, albeit to a lesser extent and/or less broadly across cohorts. SNCA, GRM3 and MBP survived strict Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Taken together, these results suggest that our stress-reactive DBP animal model helped to validate and prioritize from the CFG-discovered genes some of the key behaviorally relevant genes for alcoholism. These genes fall into a series of biological pathways involved in signal transduction, transmission of nerve impulse (including myelination) and cocaine addiction. Overall, our work provides leads towards a better understanding of illness, diagnostics and therapeutics, including treatment with omega-3 fatty acids. We also examined the overlap between the top candidate genes for alcoholism from this work and the top candidate genes for bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety from previous CFG analyses conducted by us, as well as cross-tested genetic risk predictions. This revealed the significant genetic overlap with other major psychiatric disorder domains, providing a basis for comorbidity and dual diagnosis, and placing alcohol use in the broader context of modulating the mental landscape. Nature Publishing Group 2014-05 2014-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4035721/ /pubmed/24844177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/tp.2014.29 Text en Copyright © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Levey, D F Le-Niculescu, H Frank, J Ayalew, M Jain, N Kirlin, B Learman, R Winiger, E Rodd, Z Shekhar, A Schork, N Kiefe, F Wodarz, N Müller-Myhsok, B Dahmen, N Nöthen, M Sherva, R Farrer, L Smith, A H Kranzler, H R Rietschel, M Gelernter, J Niculescu, A B Genetic risk prediction and neurobiological understanding of alcoholism |
title | Genetic risk prediction and neurobiological understanding of alcoholism |
title_full | Genetic risk prediction and neurobiological understanding of alcoholism |
title_fullStr | Genetic risk prediction and neurobiological understanding of alcoholism |
title_full_unstemmed | Genetic risk prediction and neurobiological understanding of alcoholism |
title_short | Genetic risk prediction and neurobiological understanding of alcoholism |
title_sort | genetic risk prediction and neurobiological understanding of alcoholism |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4035721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24844177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/tp.2014.29 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leveydf geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT leniculescuh geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT frankj geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT ayalewm geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT jainn geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT kirlinb geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT learmanr geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT winigere geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT roddz geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT shekhara geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT schorkn geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT kiefef geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT wodarzn geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT mullermyhsokb geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT dahmenn geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT nothenm geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT shervar geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT farrerl geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT smithah geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT kranzlerhr geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT rietschelm geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT gelernterj geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism AT niculescuab geneticriskpredictionandneurobiologicalunderstandingofalcoholism |