Cargando…

Comparison of Exoelectrogenic Bacteria Detected Using Two Different Methods: U-tube Microbial Fuel Cell and Plating Method

In a microbial fuel cell (MFC), exoelectrogens, which transfer electrons to the electrode, have been regarded as a key factor for electricity generation. In this study, U-tube MFC and plating methods were used to isolate exoelectrogens from the anode of an MFC. Disparate microorganisms were identifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Jaecheul, Cho, Sunja, Kim, Sunah, Cho, Haein, Lee, Taeho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese Society of Microbial Ecology/The Japanese Society of Soil Microbiology 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4036030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22129603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME11205
_version_ 1782318123303567360
author Yu, Jaecheul
Cho, Sunja
Kim, Sunah
Cho, Haein
Lee, Taeho
author_facet Yu, Jaecheul
Cho, Sunja
Kim, Sunah
Cho, Haein
Lee, Taeho
author_sort Yu, Jaecheul
collection PubMed
description In a microbial fuel cell (MFC), exoelectrogens, which transfer electrons to the electrode, have been regarded as a key factor for electricity generation. In this study, U-tube MFC and plating methods were used to isolate exoelectrogens from the anode of an MFC. Disparate microorganisms were identified depending on isolation methods, despite the use of an identical source. Denaturing gel gradient electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis showed that certain microorganisms became dominant in the U-tube MFC. The predominant bacterium was similar to Ochrobactrum sp., belonging to the Alphaproteobacteria, which was shown to be able to function as an exoelectrogen in a previous study. Three isolates, one affiliated with Bacillus sp. and two with Paenibacillus sp., were identified using the plating method, which belonged to the Gram-positive bacteria, the Firmicutes. The U-tube MFCs were inoculated with the three isolates using the plating method, operated in the batch mode and the current was monitored. All of the U-tube MFCs inoculated with each isolate after isolation from plates produced lower current (peak current density: 3.6–16.3 mA/m(2)) than those in U-tube MFCs with mixed culture (48.3–62.6 mA/m(2)). Although the isolates produced low currents, various bacterial groups were found to be involved in current production.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4036030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Japanese Society of Microbial Ecology/The Japanese Society of Soil Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40360302014-07-24 Comparison of Exoelectrogenic Bacteria Detected Using Two Different Methods: U-tube Microbial Fuel Cell and Plating Method Yu, Jaecheul Cho, Sunja Kim, Sunah Cho, Haein Lee, Taeho Microbes Environ Regular Paper In a microbial fuel cell (MFC), exoelectrogens, which transfer electrons to the electrode, have been regarded as a key factor for electricity generation. In this study, U-tube MFC and plating methods were used to isolate exoelectrogens from the anode of an MFC. Disparate microorganisms were identified depending on isolation methods, despite the use of an identical source. Denaturing gel gradient electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis showed that certain microorganisms became dominant in the U-tube MFC. The predominant bacterium was similar to Ochrobactrum sp., belonging to the Alphaproteobacteria, which was shown to be able to function as an exoelectrogen in a previous study. Three isolates, one affiliated with Bacillus sp. and two with Paenibacillus sp., were identified using the plating method, which belonged to the Gram-positive bacteria, the Firmicutes. The U-tube MFCs were inoculated with the three isolates using the plating method, operated in the batch mode and the current was monitored. All of the U-tube MFCs inoculated with each isolate after isolation from plates produced lower current (peak current density: 3.6–16.3 mA/m(2)) than those in U-tube MFCs with mixed culture (48.3–62.6 mA/m(2)). Although the isolates produced low currents, various bacterial groups were found to be involved in current production. Japanese Society of Microbial Ecology/The Japanese Society of Soil Microbiology 2012-03 2011-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4036030/ /pubmed/22129603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME11205 Text en Copyright © 2012 by the Japanese Society of Microbial Ecology / the Japanese Society of Soil Microbiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Regular Paper
Yu, Jaecheul
Cho, Sunja
Kim, Sunah
Cho, Haein
Lee, Taeho
Comparison of Exoelectrogenic Bacteria Detected Using Two Different Methods: U-tube Microbial Fuel Cell and Plating Method
title Comparison of Exoelectrogenic Bacteria Detected Using Two Different Methods: U-tube Microbial Fuel Cell and Plating Method
title_full Comparison of Exoelectrogenic Bacteria Detected Using Two Different Methods: U-tube Microbial Fuel Cell and Plating Method
title_fullStr Comparison of Exoelectrogenic Bacteria Detected Using Two Different Methods: U-tube Microbial Fuel Cell and Plating Method
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Exoelectrogenic Bacteria Detected Using Two Different Methods: U-tube Microbial Fuel Cell and Plating Method
title_short Comparison of Exoelectrogenic Bacteria Detected Using Two Different Methods: U-tube Microbial Fuel Cell and Plating Method
title_sort comparison of exoelectrogenic bacteria detected using two different methods: u-tube microbial fuel cell and plating method
topic Regular Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4036030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22129603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME11205
work_keys_str_mv AT yujaecheul comparisonofexoelectrogenicbacteriadetectedusingtwodifferentmethodsutubemicrobialfuelcellandplatingmethod
AT chosunja comparisonofexoelectrogenicbacteriadetectedusingtwodifferentmethodsutubemicrobialfuelcellandplatingmethod
AT kimsunah comparisonofexoelectrogenicbacteriadetectedusingtwodifferentmethodsutubemicrobialfuelcellandplatingmethod
AT chohaein comparisonofexoelectrogenicbacteriadetectedusingtwodifferentmethodsutubemicrobialfuelcellandplatingmethod
AT leetaeho comparisonofexoelectrogenicbacteriadetectedusingtwodifferentmethodsutubemicrobialfuelcellandplatingmethod