Cargando…

Portion size effects on weight gain in a free living setting

OBJECTIVE: Examine the effect of weekday exposure over six months to different lunch sizes on energy intake and body weight in a free-living sample of working adults. DESIGN AND METHODS: Adults (n=233) were randomly assigned to one of three lunch size groups (400 kcal; 800 kcal; 1600 kcal) or to a n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: French, Simone A, Mitchell, Nathan R, Wolfson, Julian, Harnack, Lisa J, Jeffery, Robert W, Gerlach, Anne F, Blundell, John E, Pentel, Paul R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4037334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24510841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20720
_version_ 1782318240849985536
author French, Simone A
Mitchell, Nathan R
Wolfson, Julian
Harnack, Lisa J
Jeffery, Robert W
Gerlach, Anne F
Blundell, John E
Pentel, Paul R
author_facet French, Simone A
Mitchell, Nathan R
Wolfson, Julian
Harnack, Lisa J
Jeffery, Robert W
Gerlach, Anne F
Blundell, John E
Pentel, Paul R
author_sort French, Simone A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Examine the effect of weekday exposure over six months to different lunch sizes on energy intake and body weight in a free-living sample of working adults. DESIGN AND METHODS: Adults (n=233) were randomly assigned to one of three lunch size groups (400 kcal; 800 kcal; 1600 kcal) or to a no-free lunch control group for six months. Weight and energy intake were measured at baseline, and months 1, 3, and 6. RESULTS: Lunch energy was significantly higher in the 800 and 1600 kcal groups compared to the 400 kcal group (p < 0.0001). Total energy was significantly higher for the 1600 kcal group compared to the 400 and 800 kcal groups (p = 0.02). Body weight change at six months did not significantly differ at the 5% level by experimental group (1600 kcal group: +1.1 kg (sd=0.44); 800 kcal group: −0.1 kg (sd=0.42); 400 kcal group: −0.1 kg (sd=0.43); control group: 1.1 (sd=0.42); p=.07). Weight gain over time was significant in the 1600 kcal box lunch group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Weekday exposure for six months to a 1600 kcal lunch caused significant increases in total energy intake and weight gain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4037334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40373342014-12-01 Portion size effects on weight gain in a free living setting French, Simone A Mitchell, Nathan R Wolfson, Julian Harnack, Lisa J Jeffery, Robert W Gerlach, Anne F Blundell, John E Pentel, Paul R Obesity (Silver Spring) Article OBJECTIVE: Examine the effect of weekday exposure over six months to different lunch sizes on energy intake and body weight in a free-living sample of working adults. DESIGN AND METHODS: Adults (n=233) were randomly assigned to one of three lunch size groups (400 kcal; 800 kcal; 1600 kcal) or to a no-free lunch control group for six months. Weight and energy intake were measured at baseline, and months 1, 3, and 6. RESULTS: Lunch energy was significantly higher in the 800 and 1600 kcal groups compared to the 400 kcal group (p < 0.0001). Total energy was significantly higher for the 1600 kcal group compared to the 400 and 800 kcal groups (p = 0.02). Body weight change at six months did not significantly differ at the 5% level by experimental group (1600 kcal group: +1.1 kg (sd=0.44); 800 kcal group: −0.1 kg (sd=0.42); 400 kcal group: −0.1 kg (sd=0.43); control group: 1.1 (sd=0.42); p=.07). Weight gain over time was significant in the 1600 kcal box lunch group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Weekday exposure for six months to a 1600 kcal lunch caused significant increases in total energy intake and weight gain. 2014-02-19 2014-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4037334/ /pubmed/24510841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20720 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
French, Simone A
Mitchell, Nathan R
Wolfson, Julian
Harnack, Lisa J
Jeffery, Robert W
Gerlach, Anne F
Blundell, John E
Pentel, Paul R
Portion size effects on weight gain in a free living setting
title Portion size effects on weight gain in a free living setting
title_full Portion size effects on weight gain in a free living setting
title_fullStr Portion size effects on weight gain in a free living setting
title_full_unstemmed Portion size effects on weight gain in a free living setting
title_short Portion size effects on weight gain in a free living setting
title_sort portion size effects on weight gain in a free living setting
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4037334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24510841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20720
work_keys_str_mv AT frenchsimonea portionsizeeffectsonweightgaininafreelivingsetting
AT mitchellnathanr portionsizeeffectsonweightgaininafreelivingsetting
AT wolfsonjulian portionsizeeffectsonweightgaininafreelivingsetting
AT harnacklisaj portionsizeeffectsonweightgaininafreelivingsetting
AT jefferyrobertw portionsizeeffectsonweightgaininafreelivingsetting
AT gerlachannef portionsizeeffectsonweightgaininafreelivingsetting
AT blundelljohne portionsizeeffectsonweightgaininafreelivingsetting
AT pentelpaulr portionsizeeffectsonweightgaininafreelivingsetting